04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.2 N = 1, d = 4(Poincaré) supergravity 155<br />

purely algebraic, we are going to find that there is torsion proportional to some expression<br />

quadratic in fermions, making the ˆRµν a,−1 (Â) components of the supercurvature vanish.<br />

Substituting the torsion into the action will give rise to terms that are quartic in fermions.<br />

In what follows we are going to study these actions, their equations of motion, <strong>and</strong> their<br />

symmetries separately. The most efficient way to do it is to treat them in the so-called<br />

1.5-order formalism: we consider that we have solved the equation of motion of the spin<br />

connection <strong>and</strong> we have substituted its solution back into the action, but we do not do it<br />

explicitly, keeping the action in its first-order form. Then, in varying over the two remaining<br />

fundamental fields (the Vierbein <strong>and</strong> gravitino), we use the chain rule, varying over the spin<br />

connection first. That variation is its equation of motion, which has been solved, <strong>and</strong> simply<br />

vanishes. In this way, many calculations are greatly simplified.<br />

We are going to make this study as self-contained as possible <strong>and</strong>, thus, we will repeat<br />

some of the general points explained in this introductory section.<br />

5.2 N = 1, d = 4 (Poincaré) supergravity<br />

The fields of N = 1, d = 4supergravity are the Vierbein <strong>and</strong> the gravitino {ea µ,ψµ}. The<br />

gravitino is a vector of Majorana (real) spinors. The action is written in a first-order form,<br />

in which the spin connection ωµ ab is also considered as an independent field <strong>and</strong> the action<br />

contains only first derivatives. We rewrite the action here for convenience, setting χ = 1:<br />

S[ea µ,ωµ ab <br />

,ψµ] =<br />

d4xe R(e,ω)+ 2e−1ɛ µνρσ <br />

¯ψµγ5γνDρψσ . (5.20)<br />

Here Dµ is the Lorentz-covariant derivative (rather than the completely covariant derivative,<br />

which we denote as usual by ∇µ),<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

Dµψν = ∂µψν − 1<br />

4 ωµ ab γabψν, ∇µψν = Dµψν − Ɣµν ρ ψρ, (5.21)<br />

R(e,ω)= ea µ eb ν Rµν ab (ω), (5.22)<br />

where Rµν ab (ω) is the Lorentz curvature of the Lorentz connection ωµ ab ,Eq. (1.81).<br />

As usual, to obtain the second-order action we solve the spin-connection equation of<br />

motion <strong>and</strong> substitute the solution for ωµ ab in terms of ea µ <strong>and</strong> ψµ back into the first-order<br />

action. The spin-connection equation of motion is<br />

δS<br />

µνρ<br />

= 3!eabc<br />

δωµ<br />

ab<br />

<br />

Dνe c ρ + i<br />

2 ¯ψνγ c ψρ<br />

<br />

= 0. (5.23)<br />

This equation implies that the expression in brackets, antisymmetrized in ν <strong>and</strong> ρ, iszero.<br />

Looking at Eq. (1.86), we see that there is torsion in this theory <strong>and</strong> it is given by 5<br />

5 The bilinear ¯ψµγ a ψν is automatically antisymmetric in µν.<br />

Tµν a = i ¯ψµγ a ψν. (5.24)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!