12.08.2013 Views

INDUSTRIAL LAND IN A POST-INDUSTRIAL CITY District of ...

INDUSTRIAL LAND IN A POST-INDUSTRIAL CITY District of ...

INDUSTRIAL LAND IN A POST-INDUSTRIAL CITY District of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> Columbia Industrial Areas Study DC Office <strong>of</strong> Planning<br />

Prepared by Phillips Preiss Shapiro Associates, Inc.<br />

4 Recommendations<br />

The recommendations herein build from the previous chapters <strong>of</strong> this report by considering the<br />

need for and importance <strong>of</strong> appropriate industrial land in the <strong>District</strong>, the supply and demand for<br />

industrial land and buildings, and the overall findings resulting from the land use surveys and<br />

sub-area analyses described above. They are intended for two purposes: (1) as a guide to<br />

zoning policy as it relates to industrially-zoned land; and (2) as a guide to strategies the <strong>District</strong><br />

can undertake to maintain and enhance its base <strong>of</strong> PDR employment. Item one speaks directly<br />

to land use; item two has both land use and policy components.<br />

Simply put, this study revealed that the <strong>District</strong>’s existing zoning framework regarding<br />

industrially zoned land requires modernization. As a result, this chapter begins by positing a<br />

new zoning framework for industrial land, which is then referenced in subsequent sections. This<br />

framework is in direct response to deficiencies identified in the existing zoning categories and<br />

regulations, and is designed to address the issues outlined in the previous sections <strong>of</strong> this<br />

report. The recommendations for different industrial sub-districts cannot be adequately<br />

implemented within the existing zoning framework. The new framework keeps the existing zone<br />

districts, with modifications, but recommends two additional zoning districts to be added to the<br />

zoning ordinance and map.<br />

These recommendations were not made arbitrarily or without great consideration—each<br />

recommendation followed a discernible logic. First, based on information compiled from the<br />

user’s survey, technical advisory committee, market analysis, economic analysis, and fieldwork,<br />

PPSA and OP analyzed the <strong>District</strong>’s “heavy” land use needs. Second, using fieldwork, the<br />

opportunities and constraints and scoring matrices (both described Section 3) and PPSA’s<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgment, we analyzed the study areas’ suitability for continued PDR use. Areas<br />

deemed suitable were analyzed to determine whether they were more appropriate for private (or<br />

market driven) or public (municipal) use. Areas unsuitable for continued PDR use (e.g. areas<br />

near Metro stations) were considered for land use changes. Discussed in Section 1.2 and<br />

reproduced here, Figure 4.1 clearly illustrates this logic:<br />

- 78 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!