Traffic Assessment - Renfrewshire Council
Traffic Assessment - Renfrewshire Council
Traffic Assessment - Renfrewshire Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Meeting at <strong>Renfrewshire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> JobNo. SCT3526<br />
31 October 2012<br />
Table 3 of the note indicated the ratio of external and internal trips by mode and included a<br />
comparison of the trips generated, and subsequently discounted, by the 2,500m 2 foodstore.<br />
JE agreed the methodology of calculating the ratio of internal and external trips was<br />
acceptable. JE also confirmed it is appropriate to discount the internally generated trips from<br />
the wider local road network of Bishopton Village.<br />
d) Pass-by / Diverted Trips – SL set out JMPs proposal to discount pass-by / diverted vehicle<br />
trips from the ‘total’ external vehicle trips. It was agreed by all that 30% pass-by / diverted is<br />
acceptable and this would likely be a mix of pass-by trips from the employment opportunities<br />
in Dargavel and from the park and ride and diverted trips from the existing Bishopton Village<br />
(returning from work).<br />
SL proposed that pass-by trips from Dargavel employment opportunities and the park and ride<br />
would already be included in the vehicle trip calculations for the Masterplan. SL also proposed<br />
that any diverted trips to the new store from Bishopton would be locally reassigned<br />
movements on the immediate local road network, therefore having no impact on traffic<br />
volumes. JMP therefore propose to discount 30% pass-by trips from the total vehicle trips,<br />
thereby providing a final net-increase of 191 two-way vehicle trips on the wider local road<br />
network of Bishopton, during the weekday PM peak period. JE confirmed this is acceptable.<br />
e) Distribution & Assignment – The distribution of vehicle trips to / from Bishopton will be based<br />
on a gravity model using population census output areas for Bishopton. JE agreed this is<br />
acceptable.<br />
The assignment of traffic to the local road network will be based on travel times with 100% of<br />
traffic via Station Road. JMcD advised that the northern and southern access points are likely<br />
to be constructed and linked via Dargavel by the time the foodstore is opened. SL highlighted<br />
there is therefore an alternative route for residents from the northern area of Bishopton. JE is<br />
reluctant to discount any further traffic that could go through Station Road and while it is<br />
accepted there may be an alternative route, the TA should still consider 100% via Station<br />
Road in the first instance.<br />
4. Growth Factor<br />
JMP assumes there will have been little or no growth in background traffic since traffic surveys<br />
were previously carried out in 2005. JMcD confirmed traffic surveys have been carried out along<br />
the A8, Station Rd and Rossland Crescent and these will be used to determine the actual level of<br />
growth.<br />
JE confirmed 0% growth would be acceptable if supported by the recent surveys.<br />
Note: It was generally agreed that should the recent traffic surveys demonstrate a reduction in<br />
traffic volumes, the flows used for the 2008 TA would be used to provide a robust analysis as all<br />
transport interventions have been based on the previous analysis.<br />
5. <strong>Assessment</strong> Years<br />
JMcD confirmed the year of completion for the full Dargavel Village is currently estimated to be<br />
around 2027 / 2028. In terms of the opening year of the foodstore, this will be market led but is<br />
likely to be around 2020.<br />
JE agreed that as the local roads infrastructure will be in place before Dargavel is fully built out<br />
and also prior to the opening of the foodstore, it is acceptable to assess a year of completion only<br />
for all of Dargavel i.e. 2027 with traffic growth if required.<br />
6. Committed Developments<br />
SL presented a table indicating all of the committed development that had been considered by the<br />
2008 TA. JE confirmed which developments had been completed and those developments where<br />
consent had lapsed or commencement had been delayed (primarily due to the recession).<br />
While it was acknowledged that the TA currently being prepared for the foodstore does not need<br />
to consider developments where the consent has lapsed, JE requested these are included as they<br />
Page 2of 3<br />
JMP<br />
JMP