Traffic Assessment - Renfrewshire Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Methodology for Residential Development 4.65 The general methodology which has been applied is as follows: • People Trip Generation – Calculated using information from the TRICS database for residential related trips. • Residential Development People Trip Distribution – Distribution will generally follow existing patterns of Bishopton residents and the wider patterns in Renfrewshire. The existing trip distribution was obtained through analysis of 2001 census travel to work data. The patterns arising from above indicate high proportions of residents working within 5km of Bishopton. It is considered appropriate to continue with this pattern because firstly, there will be a significant number of new jobs in Bishopton, which will encourage synergy between the land uses and secondly, the trip generation relates to all trips, not just trips to work and hence a high degree of non work related trips will occur, for example taking children to school. • Residential Development People Trip Distribution – The distribution of trips within distance travelled bands has been undertaken using gravity model principles. For the residential development this process is based on the number of jobs within ward areas (these are taken from Annual Business Inquiry (ABI) 2001 (ABI) Statistics) • Residential Mode Share - The mode share used is that currently occurring in Bishopton again taken from the 2001 census data of Bishopton. The mode share is applied in bands of distance travelled to reflect local walking and at the other end of the scale the high proportion of car trips on longer distances. The impact of the train is also included. However, no adjustment has been made to account for the likely future upgrading of services on the Bishopton line (or on the rail network generally) during the implementation phases of the development which could increase the percentage of travel by train. Key Information Regarding Residential Development People Trip Distribution 4.66 The 2001 Census identified the distance which people from Bishopton currently travel to work and the Scottish Household Survey indicated the Council area of workplace. These are indicated in Table 4.14 and Table 4.15 below. Table 4.14 Distance Travelled to Work by Bishopton Residents Distance Travelled 0-5km 5km-10km 10km-20km 20km+ Percentage 20% 32% 41% 7% Table 4.15 Council Area of Residence and Workplace (1999 - 2002) Area of Workplace Area of Residence Glasgow Argyle/Dunbarton Renfrewshire / Inverclyde Others Total Renfrewshire / Inverclyde 28% 3% 62% 7% 100% 4.67 JMP has combined both of the above data sets to determine an appropriate distribution of travel to work from the proposed development at Bishopton. Table 4.16 indicates the distribution of travel to work by employment location.
Table 4.16 Proposed Residential Development Trip Distribution (2-way) Distance Band Percentage by Band 0-5km 20% Bishopton (area around main settlement) Employment Location AM Trips PM Trips Comments 149 135 Erskine West 237 214 Erskine Central 22 20 5-10km 32% Glasgow Airport 299 271 St James 77 70 Erskine SEast and Inchinnan 76 69 Linwood (East and West) 46 41 Houston/Bridge of Weir/ Brookfield/Craigend/ Langbank 93 84 Dumbartonshire / Argyle 61 55 3% 10-20km 41% Paisley 140 125 Johnstone 26 24 Glasgow 586 530 28% Port Glasgow plus part Inverclyde 46 42 Kilmalcolm 6 6 Renfrew / Braehead 63 57 20km+ 7% Remainder of Inverclyde 143 129 Total 100% 2070 1872 4.68 Table 4.16 requires a correction for student trips to both Paisley and Glasgow. The trip generation was discounted as detailed in paragraphs 4.52 to 4.54 to account for student trips. However to account for the limited number of trips which are made by students in the peak hours 32 trips have been added in the AM peak (i.e. 2070 trips) and 27 trips in the PM peak (i.e. 1872 trips). These have been assigned as 50/50 split between Paisley and Glasgow. These student trips are included in Table 4.18, Table 4.19, Table 4.26 and Table 4.27. 4.69 The mode share which has been applied to the above people trips has been taken from the 2001 Census, where mode of travel by distance travelled to work is provided. For Bishopton, the Census details for mode share by distance are indicated by Table 4.17. Table 4.17 Mode Share by Distance Travelled to Work by Bishopton Residents Percentage Mode Share 0-5km 5km-10km 10km-20km 20km+ Walk 14% 2% 0% 0% Cycle 1% 1% 0% 0% Bus 3% 2% 1% 1% Train 3% 12% 26% 10% Car 66% 75% 65% 86% Other 13% 8% 8% 3% All Modes 100% 100% 100% 100% 4.70 The application of the above mode share to the trip distribution identifies the following total trip movements by mode associated with AM and PM peak hour residential development related trips respectively.
Page 1 and 2:
Dargavel Village Proposed Village C
Page 3 and 4:
Dargavel Village Proposed Village C
Page 5 and 6:
Travel Plan........................
Page 7 and 8:
1.3 The vehicular access strategy f
Page 9 and 10:
2 Existing and Committed Transport
Page 11 and 12:
Public Transport 2.12 Conditions 13
Page 13 and 14:
Table 2.3 Dargavel Masterplan - Bus
Page 15 and 16:
Greenock Road / Kingston Road 2.34
Page 17 and 18:
3.7 Furthermore, with the increase
Page 19 and 20:
Table 3.4 Internal & External Peopl
Page 21 and 22:
3.31 Following the preparation of a
Page 23 and 24:
4.7 As the consented infrastructure
Page 25 and 26:
4.17 With regard to the signalised
Page 27 and 28:
Table 4.5 A8 Greenock Road / Statio
Page 29 and 30:
4.42 For the purposes of this exerc
Page 31 and 32:
• Junction format and is there a
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 5.1 Station Road Underpass F
Page 35 and 36:
Table 5.1 Dargavel Masterplan - Bus
Page 37 and 38:
6 Car Parking Strategy Management 6
Page 39 and 40:
Table 6.2 Town Centre Shared Trips
Page 41 and 42: 7 Conclusions 7.1 JMP Consultants L
Page 43 and 44: Rossland Crescent Access • A furt
Page 45: Consented Masterplan Page Job No Re
Page 49 and 50: Indicative Village Centre Layout Pa
Page 52 and 53: Appendix C Walking and Cycling Info
Page 54 and 55: © Crown copyright. All rights rese
Page 56: Key NCN 75 NCN 7 Existing National
Page 59: Park and Ride Indicative JMP 2011 P
Page 63: Proposed Bus Network Proposals JMP
Page 67 and 68: Traffic Data Figure F1 - Weekday PM
Page 69 and 70: Old Greenock Road Ferry Road Kingst
Page 71 and 72: In 94 Out 98 Old Greenock Road Ferr
Page 73 and 74: Old Greenock Road Ferry Road Kingst
Page 75 and 76: Output Area Population Distribution
Page 77 and 78: Old Greenock Road Ferry Road Kinsto
Page 79 and 80: Weekday Arrivals Departures Totals
Page 81 and 82: 2008 Transport Assessment Chapter 4
Page 83 and 84: 4.10 It has been assumed that all p
Page 85 and 86: 4.26 It should be noted that althou
Page 87 and 88: Employment 4.38 As with the residen
Page 89 and 90: Secondary Education 4.52 The second
Page 91: Table 4.13 Peak Hour Residential an
Page 95 and 96: Methodology for Employment Developm
Page 97 and 98: Table 4.24 Employment Development -
Page 99 and 100: Conclusion 4.80 The residual car tr
Page 102 and 103: Appendix H Proposed Road Infrastruc
Page 104: Rev. Client Project Title Date Draw
Page 108 and 109: TRICS and Trip Generation Calculati
Page 110 and 111: TRICS 2012(b)v6.10.2 171012 B15.27
Page 116 and 117: Bishopton Retail Trip Generation Ca
Page 118 and 119: Bishopton Retail Transport Assessme
Page 120 and 121: Junction Analysis Output Files 1 -
Page 122 and 123: ENUMERATOR : JOB NUMBER : SCT3526 S
Page 124 and 125: -----------------------------------
Page 126 and 127: TIME PERIOD BEGINS 16.00 AND ENDS 1
Page 128 and 129: I D-C 1.51 5.79 0.260 0.00 0.34 4.9
Page 130 and 131: I A-D 3.78 I I AB-C ( 7.23) I I AB-
Page 132 and 133: I 17.00-17.15 I I B-ACD 0.40 6.18 0
Page 134 and 135: ------------------------- TIME NO.
Page 136 and 137: I C-A I 503.8 I 335.8 I I I I I I C
Page 138 and 139: -----------------------------------
Page 140 and 141: . QUEUE AND DELAY INFORMATION FOR E
Page 142 and 143:
I C-A 5.36 I I C-B 0.12 I I CD-A (
Page 144 and 145:
I AB-D ( 3.89) 7.31 0.532 1.09 1.11
Page 146 and 147:
I A-B 0.30 I I A-C 4.79 I I A-D 2.5
Page 148 and 149:
. QUEUE FOR STREAM CD-B -----------
Page 150 and 151:
TRL LIMITED (C) COPYRIGHT 2006 CAPA
Page 152 and 153:
I MAJOR ROAD RIGHT TURN - WIDTH I (
Page 154 and 155:
I ARM C I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 6
Page 156 and 157:
I C-A 1.49 I I A-B 1.02 I I A-C 7.4
Page 158 and 159:
I B-C 4.84 6.15 0.787 24.60 8.50 24
Page 160 and 161:
. 16.30 1.8 ** 16.45 4.5 **** 17.00
Page 162 and 163:
TIME PERIOD BEGINS 16.00 AND ENDS 1
Page 164 and 165:
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDE
Page 166 and 167:
I I .------------------------------
Page 168 and 169:
ENDING IN QUEUE 16.15 0.6 * 16.30 0
Page 170 and 171:
Output Summary Output Summary User
Page 172 and 173:
Output Summary Scenario 2: 'Scenari
Page 174 and 175:
Output Summary Scenario 3: 'Scenari
Page 176 and 177:
Output Summary Lane Input Data Junc
Page 178 and 179:
Output Summary Stage Diagram 1 Min
Page 180 and 181:
Basic Results Summary Basic Results
Page 182 and 183:
Basic Results Summary Scenario 2: '
Page 184 and 185:
Basic Results Summary Scenario 3: '
Page 186 and 187:
Basic Results Summary Lane Input Da
Page 188 and 189:
Basic Results Summary Stage Sequenc
Page 190 and 191:
Basic Results Summary Basic Results
Page 192 and 193:
Basic Results Summary Lane Input Da
Page 194 and 195:
___________________ A R C A D Y 6 _
Page 196 and 197:
E = entry width Vm = minimum approa
Page 198 and 199:
I 16.00-16.15 I I ARM A 7.10 15.65
Page 200 and 201:
-----------------------------------
Page 202 and 203:
.QUEUE AT ARM C -------------- TIME
Page 205 and 206:
Appendix K Renfrewshire Council Con
Page 207 and 208:
Meeting Minutes Date 1 November 201
Page 209 and 210:
Meeting at Renfrewshire Council Job
Page 211 and 212:
This e-mail, and any files transmit
Page 213:
[D] 0141 226 6926 [T] 0141 221 4030
show all

Traffic Assessment - Renfrewshire Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?