here - Australian College of Veterinary Scientists
here - Australian College of Veterinary Scientists
here - Australian College of Veterinary Scientists
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Each injection site is visually examined and gently palpated for changes in size,<br />
erythema and turgidity. Reactions are scaled subjectively as with small animals with a<br />
score <strong>of</strong> 0 (no increase in wheal size, using the negative control as a reference) to 4<br />
(large increase in wheal size, using the positive control as a reference), with 2 and 3<br />
reactions being somew<strong>here</strong> in between. Reactions greater than 2/4 are considered to<br />
be positive (16). Some clinicians elect to also measure the wheal diameter to provide a<br />
more objective assessment <strong>of</strong> reactivity.<br />
Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Results<br />
What are we expecting to occur in an allergic individual? At a cellular level, relevant<br />
allergens will theoretically bind and bridge reaginic IgE antibodies on the surface <strong>of</strong><br />
mast cells and result in mast cell degranulation resulting in wheal and flare reactions<br />
(16).<br />
It has been suggested that positive intradermal reactions be interpreted with caution<br />
in horses (1). Various studies have proposed that irritant reactions may be responsible<br />
for false positive results and allergen concentration in the test kit may need to be<br />
adjusted in horses as compared with small animals. In particular, allergens reported to<br />
evoke strong reactions in horses include Lucerne, grain mill dust, grain smuts,<br />
cottonseed, fireweed, yellowdock, Russian thistle, deer fly, Rhizopus spp., Candida<br />
albicans, black fly, horse fly, and black ant (1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8).<br />
Several studies comparing reactions in normal horses and horses with a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
allergic skin and respiratory diseases have concluded that normal horses will have one<br />
or more positive reactions, but that ‘allergic’ horses will have a significantly greater<br />
number <strong>of</strong> positive reactions; although the significance <strong>of</strong> reactions to individual<br />
allergens has been hard to interpret (1, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14).<br />
Possible causes <strong>of</strong> false positive and false negative results are summarized in a table 2,<br />
extracted from Equine Dermatology by Scott and Miller (1).<br />
ACVSC Proceedings Dermatology Chapter Science Week 2005 27