15.08.2013 Views

here - Australian College of Veterinary Scientists

here - Australian College of Veterinary Scientists

here - Australian College of Veterinary Scientists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Wheals vary in size and shape and quite arbitrarily may be divided into:<br />

1. Conventional: 2-3mm up to 3-5mm.<br />

2. Papular: multiple small uniform 3-6mm diameter wheals i.e. insect bites.<br />

3. Giant: either single or coalesced multiple wheals up to 20-30cm diameter.<br />

4. Annular: donut like lesions.<br />

The lesion may present differently depending on the location <strong>of</strong> the oedema i.e.<br />

whether it is in the upper layers <strong>of</strong> the dermis or subcutaneous and may be pruritic or<br />

non pruritic.<br />

1. "Oozing urticaria" - w<strong>here</strong> dermal oedema is severe, oozing <strong>of</strong> serum from<br />

the skin surface may occur. Care should be taken to distinguish this from an<br />

erosive/ulcerative process or a pyoderma. NB lesion must still pit on pressure.<br />

2. Gyrate urticaria - has been referred to as the dermal form <strong>of</strong> erythema<br />

multiforme but it should be stressed that this syndrome is not related to 'true'<br />

erythema multiforme which is primarily an epidermal disease (lesions DO NOT<br />

pit on pressure). Drug reactions appear to be the most common cause <strong>of</strong> this<br />

form <strong>of</strong> urticaria.<br />

3. Angiooedema (Angioneurotic oedema) - a subcutaneous form <strong>of</strong> urticaria<br />

which tends to be more diffuse due to lack <strong>of</strong> restraint to spread in the sub<br />

cutis. Usually involves the head and extremities and is more indicative <strong>of</strong> a<br />

systemic and serious disease than urticaria.<br />

Diagnosis<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the numerous potential causes <strong>of</strong> urticaria a definitive diagnosis may only be<br />

reached after extensive clinical and diagnostic investigation which can be time<br />

consuming, expensive and <strong>of</strong>ten unrewarding. Horse owners usually are reluctant to<br />

undertake the costly task <strong>of</strong> endeavouring to obtain an accurate diagnosis.<br />

Initially, diagnosis is mostly based on clinical signs (mostly cutaneous reaction patterns)<br />

and a careful history <strong>of</strong> the case. (Scott & Miller 2003)<br />

History is important:<br />

- Is it the first attack?<br />

- If not, how many and are they seasonal?<br />

- Site <strong>of</strong> lesions- is it a point <strong>of</strong> contact with gear?<br />

- Use <strong>of</strong> any drugs, frequency and reaction at time <strong>of</strong> use, drenches,<br />

medicated sprays, ointments, shampoos, ultrasound gel. Etc<br />

- Pasture plants<br />

Specific activities-exercise only induced<br />

Being worked, (confirm by 30 min exercise producing urticaria) out<br />

in paddock for pick <strong>of</strong> grass<br />

- Food allergy can only be traced by elimination diets and then<br />

challenge with suspected feed ( very time consuming with NO short<br />

ACVSC Proceedings Dermatology Chapter Science Week 2005 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!