17.08.2013 Views

School Plan - Blytheville Public Schools

School Plan - Blytheville Public Schools

School Plan - Blytheville Public Schools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ACSIP http://acsip.state.ar.us/cgi-bin/index.cgi?rm=report_acsip<br />

7.<br />

8.<br />

9.<br />

During the spring of 2010, all first and second grade students took the SAT10 exam. This was the<br />

third year for students to participate in this testing. First grade students scored: 30.4% on Reading<br />

Comprehension<br />

According to test results, 28.0% of all first graders scored at or above proficient.<br />

From the subskills or skill clusters reported, the weakest areas in first grade were informational<br />

content and text characteristics.<br />

Second grade students scored:<br />

24.4% on Reading Comprehension According to test results:<br />

17.0% of all second graders scored at or above proficient.<br />

From the content subskills or skill clusters reported, the weakest area in second grade were using<br />

fix-up strategies and literary skills.<br />

DIBELS Assessments for kindergarten for the 2011-2012 school year:<br />

BEGINNING OF YEAR ASSESSMENTS:<br />

66% students met DIBELS LNF benchmark<br />

MIDDLE OF YEAR ASSESSEMENTS:<br />

92% students met DIBELS LNF benchmark<br />

82% students met DIBELS PSF benchmark<br />

92.5% students met DIBELS NWF benchmark<br />

END OF YEAR ASSESSMENTS:<br />

89% students met DIBELS LNF benchmark<br />

93% students met DIBELS PSF benchmark<br />

84% students met DIBELS NWF benchmark<br />

After analyzing the data, it was determined that benchmark assessments given at the end of<br />

September rather than in August as in previous years shows a more accurate assessment of a<br />

student's beginning year knowledge. Overall, scores in all subtests for the whole school year<br />

showed a slight gain from the previous year's subtest percentages. In 2011-2012, 89% of students<br />

met the LNF benchmark score compared to 84% the previous year; 93% of students met the PSF<br />

benchmark score compared to 91% the previous year. The percentage of students meeting the<br />

NWF benchmark score remained at 84% for both years.<br />

After reviewing the portfolios which include DIBELS, we have found the following:<br />

In first grade, the 2011-2012 literacy assessments indicate that students have made gains in the<br />

area of Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (81% proficient at the beginning compared to 97%<br />

proficient at the end of the year). Data indicates that the area of weakness is Oral Reading Fluency<br />

(63% proficient at the middle of the year compared to 60% proficient at the end of the year).<br />

In second grade, the 2011-2012 data indicates that the area of weakness was Oral Reading Fluency<br />

(53% proficient at the beginning of the year compared to 29% proficient at the end of the year).<br />

DIBELS Assessments for kindergarten for the 2010-2011 school year:<br />

BEGINNING OF YEAR ASSESSMENTS:<br />

74% students met DIBELS LNF benchmark<br />

MIDDLE OF YEAR ASSESSEMENTS:<br />

85% students met DIBELS LNF benchmark<br />

78% students met DIBELS PSF benchmark<br />

89% students met DIBELS NWF benchmark<br />

END OF YEAR ASSESSMENTS:<br />

84% students met DIBELS LNF benchmark<br />

91% students met DIBELS PSF benchmark<br />

84% students met DIBELS NWF benchmark<br />

After analyzing the data, it was determined that benchmark assessments given at the end of<br />

September rather than in August as in previous years shows a more accurate assessment of a<br />

student's beginning year knowledge. Overall, scores in all subtests for the whole school year<br />

showed a slight gain from the previous year's subtest percentages. In 2010-2011, 84% of students<br />

met the LNF benchmark score compared to 81% the previous year; 91% of students met the PSF<br />

benchmark score compared to 90% the previous year. The percentage of students meeting the<br />

NWF benchmark score remained at 84% for both years<br />

After reviewing the portfolios which include DIBELS, we have found the following:<br />

In first grade, the 2010-2011 literacy assessments indicate that students have made gains in the<br />

area of Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (89% proficient at the beginning compared to 95%<br />

proficient at the end of the year) and Nonsense Word Fluency (78% proficient at the beginning<br />

compared to 83% at the end of the year.) Data indicates that the area of weakness is Oral Reading<br />

Fluency (59% proficient at the middle of the year compared to 53% proficient at the end of the<br />

year).<br />

In second grade, the 2010-2011 data indicates that the area of weakness was Oral Reading Fluency<br />

(52% proficient at the beginning of the year compared to 51% proficient at the end of the year).<br />

DIBELS Assessments for kindergarten for the 2009-2010 school year:<br />

BEGINNING OF YEAR ASSESSMENTS:<br />

71% students met DIBELS LNF benchmark<br />

MIDDLE OF YEAR ASSESSEMENTS:<br />

82% students met DIBELS LNF benchmark<br />

66% students met DIBELS PSF benchmark<br />

4 of 69 10/11/2012 1:45 PM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!