17.08.2013 Views

School Plan - Blytheville Public Schools

School Plan - Blytheville Public Schools

School Plan - Blytheville Public Schools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ACSIP http://acsip.state.ar.us/cgi-bin/index.cgi?rm=report_acsip<br />

Goal<br />

Benchmark<br />

10.<br />

11.<br />

12.<br />

80% students met DIBELS NWF benchmark<br />

END OF YEAR ASSESSMENTS:<br />

81% students met DIBELS LNF benchmark<br />

90% students met DIBELS PSF benchmark<br />

84% students met DIBELS NWF benchmark<br />

After analyzing the data, it was determined that benchmark assessments given at the end of<br />

September rather than in August as in previous years shows a more accurate assessment of a<br />

student's beginning year knowledge. Overall, scores in all subtests remained consistent with the<br />

previous year's overall percentages. Letter Naming Fluency skills remained the weakest of the three<br />

subtests.<br />

After reviewing the portfolios which include DIBELS, we have found the following:<br />

In first grade, the 2009-2010 literacy assessments indicate that students have made gains in the<br />

area of Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (94% proficient at the beginning compared to 97%<br />

proficient at the end of the year.) Data indicates that the areas of weakness are Nonsense Word<br />

Fluency (91% proficient at the beginning of the year and 85% proficient at the end of the year) and<br />

Oral Reading Fluency (68% proficient at the middle of the year compared to 58% proficient at the<br />

end of the year).<br />

In second grade, the 2009-2010 data indicates second grade students made gains in Nonsense<br />

Word Fluency (78% proficient at the beginning of the year compared to 100% at the end of the<br />

year). Data also indicates that the area of weakness was Oral Reading Fluency (61% proficient at<br />

the beginning of the year compared to 47% proficient at the end of the year).<br />

<strong>Blytheville</strong> Primary <strong>School</strong> participated in a Scholastic Audit in 2010-2011. The data is in the<br />

restructuring section.<br />

<strong>Blytheville</strong> Primary <strong>School</strong> is a feeder school for Central Elementary <strong>School</strong>. Using data from AS-IS<br />

and NORMES, the average daily attendance for Central Elementary <strong>School</strong> was 94.83% in<br />

2009-2010, and 94.83% in 2010-2011, and 95% in 2011-2012.<br />

<strong>Blytheville</strong> Primary is a Needs Improvement <strong>School</strong> as a feeder school for Central Elementary<br />

<strong>School</strong>. Our academic growth will continue to impact the efforts of the students at Central<br />

Elementary <strong>School</strong> to help maintain and exceed the standards for achievement as determined by<br />

the State Department of Education’s measurement tool.<br />

Kindergarten students will demonstrate an improvement in their ability to identify letters with<br />

automaticity, apply letter sound relationships and sucessfully segment/blend words phonetically.<br />

All first and second grade students will demonstrate an improvement in their vocabulary and listening<br />

skills which will contribute to an improvement of their reading strategies. A specific emphasis will be<br />

placed on multiple-choice literary, practical open response, and writing content and style. <strong>Blytheville</strong><br />

Primary <strong>School</strong> is a feeder school for Central Elementary <strong>School</strong>.<br />

By the end of the 2012-13 school year, students will achieve the state mandated AMO of 60.43% in<br />

literacy. Currently, 68.26% of all students are scoring proficient or above.<br />

Intervention: ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE: Implementation of literacy based on Common Core standards in all<br />

classrooms while promoting the use of Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) and Effective Literacy for Grades<br />

2-4 (ELF) strategies, providing technology for enhanced learning, and encouraging parental involvement in literacy<br />

activities.<br />

Scientific Based Research:<br />

Armbruster, B.B, Lehr, F., & Osborn, J.M. (2003). Put Reading First: The Research Building Blocks for Teaching<br />

Children to Read. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy at ED Pubs.<br />

Bear, D.R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (2004). Words Their Way: Word Study for Phonics,<br />

Vocabulary, and Spelling Instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.<br />

Beck, Isabel L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L.(2002). Bringing Words to Life, Robust Vocabulary Instruction. New<br />

York, NY: The Guilford Press<br />

Diller, Debbie. (2007). Practice with purpose. Stenhouse Publisher<br />

Dorn, L.J., French, C., & Jones, T. (1998). Apprenticeship in Literacy: Transitions Across Reading and Writing. York,<br />

MN: Stenhouse Publishers.<br />

Dorn, L.J., & Soffos, C. (2001). Scaffolding Young Writers: A Writer’s Workshop Approach. Portland, MN: Stenhouse<br />

Publishers.<br />

Clay, M.M. (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Auckland, N.Z.:Heinemann.<br />

Clay, M.M. (2005). Literacy Lessons: Part One. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.<br />

5 of 69 10/11/2012 1:45 PM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!