06.10.2013 Views

Dasein - Monoskop

Dasein - Monoskop

Dasein - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

136 PART III<br />

period of Being and Time\ Characteristic of this period, which lasts<br />

from about 1919 to 1930, is the project of an existential analysis of<br />

<strong>Dasein</strong> (Heidegger's term for 'human being'), i.e., an analysis of<br />

<strong>Dasein</strong>'s pre-theoretical and prepredicative understanding of Being<br />

(Setn). Finally, the third phase begins about 1930 and ends with<br />

Heidegger's death in 1976. In this last phase, the project of existential<br />

analysis is "turned" into the "thought of Being". Here Heidegger<br />

exorcises the last Husserlian residues from his own philosophy, and<br />

comes to deny his earlier idea according to which us "mortals" can<br />

work out an adequate understanding of Being. As we shall see, this<br />

"turning" (Kehre) in Heidegger's thought leads to an even more radical<br />

universal medium conception than the one we shall encounter in<br />

Heidegger's middle period.<br />

2. HEIDEGGER AS ADHERER TO THE CONCEPTION<br />

OF LANGUAGE AS CALCULUS IN HIS EARLY WRITINGS<br />

The first phase of Heidegger's thought, which I take to be represented<br />

by his writings from 1912 to 1916, does not pose the same amount<br />

of interpretational problems that we shall meet when turning to his<br />

later views. This is due mainly to the fact that during his earliest<br />

period Heidegger's concerns as well as his ways of expressing himself<br />

are rather close to those of the neo-Kantian Heinrich Rickert, under<br />

whom Heidegger studied in Freiburg from 1911 to 1916, and to those<br />

of Husserl, who succeeded Rickert in 1916.<br />

From the vantage point of this study, the earliest Heidegger<br />

is interesting for several reasons. First, we find Heidegger aligning<br />

himself to a considerable degree with many of those very ingredients<br />

of Husserl's conception of language/logic as calculus that he<br />

will later radically question. Second, we encounter an interesting<br />

deviation from Husserl, in that Heidegger, under the influence of<br />

Rickert, is more opposed to mathematical logic and formalism than<br />

Husserl. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that Heidegger seems to be<br />

far more intrigued by Husserl's Logical Investigations than by the<br />

Ideas. Since the latter book was published in 1913, it could have left<br />

a clearer mark on Heidegger's Habilitationsschrift 3 presented in 1915,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!