06.10.2013 Views

Dasein - Monoskop

Dasein - Monoskop

Dasein - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HEIDEGGER'S ONTOLOGY AND LANGUAGE AS THE UNIVERSAL MEDIUM 213 SI<br />

other words, what began with Descartes unfolds itself here in<br />

an uncanny way .. . 312<br />

Heidegger seems to be somewhat divided as to the question<br />

whether these and similar remarks are to be taken as genuine criticisms<br />

or as a description of something that cannot be changed. On<br />

the one hand, he clearly seems to call upon his readers to adopt a<br />

more poetic attitude towards language. On the other hand, according<br />

to the principles concerning language and Being that he himself<br />

advocates, this kind of criticism cannot lead to any changes in the<br />

way Being sends itself to us. The latter view can be read from the<br />

following passage:<br />

Language still denies us its essence ... Instead, language surrenders<br />

itself to our mere willing and trafficking as an instrument<br />

of domination over beings. 313<br />

Finally, we have to turn to the relativistic implications of Heidegger's<br />

views on language and Being:<br />

(L-7) Language is relative with respect to different communities<br />

and determines their essence and history.<br />

(B-7) An understanding of Being is relative to different languages,<br />

and is determinative of a people's essence and history.<br />

In the preceding section, we found an early expression of thesis<br />

¿-7, in "The Origin of the Work of Art". There Heidegger stresses<br />

that language opens up the world for a people, and that, in the speaking<br />

of language, "the concepts of a historical people's essence, i.e., of<br />

its belonging to world history, are preformed for that people". 314 The<br />

cultural and linguistic relativism that raises its head in these lines<br />

comes out more clearly in the following passage which also provides<br />

confirmation for our ascribing thesis B-7 to Heidegger:<br />

Some time ago I called language, clumsily enough, the house<br />

of Being. If man by virtue of his language dwells within the<br />

claim and call of Being, then we Europeans presumably dwell<br />

in an entirely different house then Eastasian man. ... And so,<br />

a dialogue from house to house remains nearly impossible. 315

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!