Dasein - Monoskop

NOTES TO PART 111
1974. On Hilbert's influence, see Picker, "Die Bedeutung der Mathematik
...", pp. 301-11. On Cantor's influence, see ibid., p. 272; and Schmit,
Husserls Philosophie der Mathematik, pp. 43-46.
l05 See page 33 of this study.
106 " Besprechung von M. Palagyi ...", p. 156; "A Reply ..p. 154.
107 See note 8.
l0S *Psychologische Studien zur elementaren Logik" (1894), in Husserliana
XXII, pp. 92-123. English translation by Peter McCormick and
Richard Hudson, "Psychological Studies for Elementary Logic", in Husserl.
Shorter Works, pp. 126-142.
l09 IG, p. 303.
ll0 /6trf., p. 315.
ul Bernhard Rang, "Einleitung des Herausgebers", in Husserliana
XXV, pp. IX-LVI, here p. XXX.
112 /G, p. 317.
113 Ibid., p. 323.
114 IG, p. 323.
n *Ibid.
n *Ibid., p. 322.
lx7 Ibid., p. 329.
ns Ibid.
ll9 E. Husserl, Die ÄViJis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die
transzendentale Phänomenologie, Husserliana VI, edited by Walter Biemel,
Martinus Nühoff, The Hague, 1954, (hereafter Krisis). English translation
by David Carr, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental
Phenomenology, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, 1970, (hereafter
Crisis).
l70 IG, p. 342.
121 Ibid., p. 342.
l77 Ibid., p. 343.
123 This is how I understand Husserl's example at the bottom of page
343. In what follows I try to give an interpretative summary of Husserl's
argument on pp. 345-46 in terms of the mathematical case, even though
Husserl does not proceed in this way. I take it, however, that the mathematical
example provides an especially clear case from which one can
appreciate Husserl's point.
174 IG, p. 344.
125 See the authors and passages cited in DeBoer, The Development
of Husserl's Thought, p. 287. See also Charles Sanders Peirce, Collected
Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul
267