06.10.2013 Views

Dasein - Monoskop

Dasein - Monoskop

Dasein - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HEIDEGGER'S ONTOLOGY AND LANGUAGE AS THE UNIVERSAL MEDIUM 189 SI<br />

spondence notion by writing that "To say that an assertion 'is true 9<br />

signifies that it uncovers the entity as it is in itself." 213 And indeed,<br />

Ernst Tugendhat, who has written a critical and penetrating exposition<br />

of Heidegger's notion of truth, argues that with this statement<br />

Heidegger does not yet go beyond Husserl. 214 This step is taken,<br />

however, as Heidegger without further argument drops the "as it is<br />

in itself", writing simply that "the being-true (truth) of the assertion<br />

must be understood as being-uncovering," 215 Tugendhat claims that<br />

with this step Heidegger loses the notion of truth as usually understood:<br />

after dropping the qualification "as it is in itself" from his<br />

notion of truth, Heidegger will no longer be able to give a criterion<br />

by which to distinguish the sense in which all assertions—even false<br />

ones—uncover something from the way in which only true assertions<br />

uncover something. 216<br />

Tugendhat's analysis is of course correct in the sense that Heidegger<br />

here indeed gives up the correspondence notion of truth.<br />

What is crucial here, however, is not so much that he does so, but<br />

rather why he is forced to do so. Heidegger's dissatisfaction with Tugendhat's<br />

book turned precisely on this point, (von Herrmann, pers.<br />

comm.) In order to appreciate this dissatisfaction, it is necessary to<br />

follow Heidegger into the heart of his notion of truth, a notion of<br />

truth that is no longer linked to assertions.<br />

Heidegger claims that truth as uncovering is grounded in the<br />

phenomenon that he calls "Being-in-the-world" 217 , alias the phenomenon<br />

that "<strong>Dasein</strong> is 'in the truth* 9 . 21 * On another occasion 219<br />

he writes that if we want to speak of truth as a relation, we should<br />

say that it is the relation "of <strong>Dasein</strong> as <strong>Dasein</strong> to its world". In<br />

Being and Time these notions are explained in four steps.<br />

First of all, Heidegger reminds us that in so far as <strong>Dasein</strong> is<br />

Being-in-the-world, where world is the universal medium of meaning,<br />

the world is disclosed to <strong>Dasein</strong>. ("To <strong>Dasein</strong> 9 s state of Being<br />

disclosedness in general essentially belongs." 220 ) In so far as <strong>Dasein</strong><br />

lives in its world, this world is an already interpreted world, a world<br />

already implicitly identified, a world that <strong>Dasein</strong> is aware of and<br />

aquainted with.<br />

Second, <strong>Dasein</strong> is "thrown into" this world, in the sense that <strong>Dasein</strong><br />

"always already" lives within some already interpreted world.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!