06.11.2013 Views

Baltic Sea

Baltic Sea

Baltic Sea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

190<br />

a<br />

200<br />

Depth (m)<br />

210<br />

220<br />

230<br />

240<br />

6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 7 7.1 7.2 7.3<br />

pot. Temperature ( o C)<br />

17.02.98 18:07<br />

17.02.98 20:49<br />

190<br />

200<br />

18.02.98 7:09<br />

17.2.98 mean prof.<br />

27.03.98 1:20<br />

21.4.98 14:57<br />

b<br />

Depth (m)<br />

210<br />

220<br />

230<br />

240<br />

12.25 12.3 12.35 12.4 12.45 12.5 12.55 12.6 12.65 12.7<br />

Salinity (g/kg)<br />

Figure 3.10: (a) Potential Temperature vs. depth, (b) salinity vs. depth of BMP271 on 17-18 February<br />

1998, 17 February 1998 (mean prole), 27 March 1998 and 21 April 1998. Sampling time given<br />

as dd.mm.yy HH:MM UTC. Diamonds represent the corresponding potential temperature and salinity<br />

averages of the basin's volume between 225-235 m.<br />

The rate term appearing in (3.6) was estimated from nite dierencing the volume average,<br />

〈S〉 V , at three dierent dates starting on 17 February 1998 (see Table 3.3). CTD-proles<br />

taken near the centre of the basin (Fig. 3.7) illustrate that after a strong increase of bottom<br />

temperatures during the warm inow event, all near-bottom temperatures and salinities (compare<br />

Fig. 3.10 b) following 17 February 1998 continuously decreased. This indicates that by<br />

this date bottom-water renewal by advection is no longer the dominating process such that the<br />

necessary conditions for the applicability of (3.6) are satised. Using the regression in equation<br />

4.10 suggested by Hagen and Feistel (2001), the volume-averaged salinities at the dates<br />

shown in Table 3.3 were estimated from salinity proles taken at the central monitoring station<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!