A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture
A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture
A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
constituted modes <strong>of</strong> visuality. To recognize <strong>the</strong> can as such was to filter <strong>the</strong> act <strong>of</strong> vision<br />
through a habituated set <strong>of</strong> perceptual practices and understand<strong>in</strong>gs. Without <strong>the</strong>se understood<br />
practices and understand<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>the</strong> visual field would rema<strong>in</strong> flat; <strong>the</strong> can would rema<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dist<strong>in</strong>guishable from <strong>the</strong> larger visual field <strong>of</strong> which it was part. The o<strong>the</strong>r key realization<br />
experienced by Lacan was that <strong>the</strong> object itself existed outside <strong>the</strong> network <strong>of</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>gs that<br />
Lacan refers to as <strong>the</strong> “Screen.” As Bryson expla<strong>in</strong>s, “Between <strong>the</strong> subject and <strong>the</strong> world is<br />
<strong>in</strong>serted <strong>the</strong> entire sum <strong>of</strong> discourses that make up visuality, that culturally construct and make<br />
visuality different from vision, <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> unmediated visual experience. Between ret<strong>in</strong>a and<br />
world is <strong>in</strong>serted a screen <strong>of</strong> signs, a screen consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> multiple discourses on vision<br />
built <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> social arena.” 313<br />
I would add fur<strong>the</strong>r that it is not only discourses on vision that<br />
form <strong>the</strong> screen, but discourse per se, as a way <strong>of</strong> order<strong>in</strong>g raw perception, that constitutes <strong>the</strong><br />
screen. The notion <strong>of</strong> screen is important both <strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong> manifestation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> e.t. is <strong>in</strong> some<br />
ways a rupture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> screen and also <strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong> screen <strong>in</strong>forms and shapes <strong>the</strong> form <strong>the</strong> alien<br />
takes.<br />
To see, for a moment, that “can” as a th<strong>in</strong>g that exists outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> screen <strong>of</strong> socially<br />
convened and naturalized codes <strong>of</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g, was experienced by Lacan as a moment <strong>of</strong> radical<br />
decenter<strong>in</strong>g. The moment <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> can is perceived as th<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong>-itself is a moment <strong>in</strong> which<br />
<strong>the</strong> know<strong>in</strong>g subject is paralyzed. The can is no longer can, it becomes <strong>in</strong>comprehensible. As it<br />
passes outside <strong>the</strong> realm <strong>of</strong> possible know<strong>in</strong>g, it ceases to be object. As it passes outside <strong>the</strong> field<br />
<strong>of</strong> mastery, <strong>the</strong> object stares back. The moment <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> can ceases to be object is a moment<br />
<strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> screen is ruptured and <strong>the</strong> Real floods through. The experience <strong>of</strong> elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
visual field or <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> visual field as a whole as unanchored by understood systems <strong>of</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />
313 Bryson, 91-92.<br />
214