24.12.2013 Views

A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture

A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture

A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

assessed <strong>the</strong> Fox sisters as <strong>the</strong> “Nemeses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pulpit.” 72<br />

Spiritualism was fur<strong>the</strong>r disparaged as<br />

a debasement and literalization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spiritual world, what Emerson referred to as “<strong>the</strong> rat hole<br />

<strong>of</strong> revelation.” 73<br />

The New York Times condemned Spiritualism for its “subversion <strong>of</strong> all respect<br />

and devotion to <strong>the</strong> only true faith,” while Wash<strong>in</strong>gton’s National Intelligencer said <strong>of</strong> it that<br />

However absurd and despicable it may appear to men <strong>of</strong> sound reason and resolute<br />

conviction, it is spread<strong>in</strong>g itself like a pestilence through our borders, carry<strong>in</strong>g with it <strong>the</strong><br />

madness <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fidelity [Spiritualism was <strong>of</strong>ten associated and even equated with Free<br />

Love], <strong>of</strong> sensuous materialism if not actual a<strong>the</strong>ism, and distract<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

nervous, <strong>the</strong> feeble-witted, and <strong>the</strong> timid <strong>in</strong>to actual <strong>in</strong>sanity. 74<br />

Note <strong>the</strong> language <strong>of</strong> dissipation, boundary cross<strong>in</strong>g and madness, all po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g to Spiritualism as<br />

a force <strong>of</strong> dis<strong>in</strong>tegration. We see here aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fundamental tension <strong>of</strong> Spiritualist practice. At<br />

<strong>the</strong> same time as it promises a new <strong>in</strong>tegration—<strong>of</strong> science and religion, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dead and <strong>the</strong><br />

liv<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>of</strong> past and future—it threatens dissipation by that very <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> mutually exclusive<br />

spheres.<br />

In Ghostwrit<strong>in</strong>g Modernity, Helen Sword writes <strong>of</strong> ways “<strong>in</strong> which mediums and<br />

communicat<strong>in</strong>g spirits unsettle seem<strong>in</strong>gly stable ontological—or, as Jacques Derrida would have<br />

it, ‘hauntological’—boundaries between self and o<strong>the</strong>r, absence and presence, materiality and<br />

spirituality, life and death.” 75<br />

Sword’s basic argument is that one can see <strong>the</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong> a<br />

postmodern/poststructural sensibility <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> communication between humans and spirits—what<br />

Basham refers to as “<strong>the</strong>se Victorian psychic puzzles, with <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>tricate clues and endless<br />

mirror<strong>in</strong>gs.” 76<br />

This is ano<strong>the</strong>r way <strong>of</strong> imag<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fundamental tension or dialectic present<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> genealogy drawn by this project. The ascendancy <strong>of</strong> positivism and its efforts to<br />

72 Oliver Wendell Holmes, “The Pr<strong>of</strong>essor at <strong>the</strong> Breakfast Table” Atlantic Monthly 3 (January 1859): 90.<br />

73 Helen Sword, Ghostwrit<strong>in</strong>g Modernism (Ithaca: Cornell University, 2000) 5.<br />

74 Moore, 28.<br />

75 Sword, xi.<br />

76 Diana Basham, The Trial <strong>of</strong> Women: Fem<strong>in</strong>ism and <strong>the</strong> Occult Sciences <strong>in</strong> Victorian Literature and Society (New<br />

York: New York University, 1992) 119.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!