24.12.2013 Views

A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture

A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture

A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

exclude <strong>the</strong> Div<strong>in</strong>e from allowable public discourse versus Spiritualism’s attempts to rearticulate<br />

matters <strong>of</strong> spirit <strong>in</strong> material form is <strong>the</strong> version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dialectic sketched <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction and<br />

tracked throughout this chapter. This move to align matters <strong>of</strong> spirit with <strong>the</strong> materialist ethos<br />

speaks to a desire for <strong>in</strong>tegration and clarity. Yet this very alignment <strong>in</strong>jects <strong>in</strong>stability <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />

materialist vision, creat<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>kages between supposedly irreconcilable spheres that disrupt <strong>the</strong><br />

ontological verities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> materialist universe—illustrat<strong>in</strong>g a dynamic tension also <strong>of</strong> central<br />

concern. Comb<strong>in</strong>ed with Sword’s observations on <strong>the</strong> ghostly as <strong>in</strong>cipiently postmodern, <strong>the</strong>se<br />

two approaches to <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> Spiritualism <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century—positivism v. neoenchantment<br />

& <strong>in</strong>tegration v. dis<strong>in</strong>tegration—present a picture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> destabilization <strong>of</strong> History<br />

sought by Foucault’s genealogy. Sword goes so far as to say that “communication with <strong>the</strong> dead<br />

is always, on some level, a repudiation <strong>of</strong> history.” 77<br />

Spiritualism was both a recrudescence and<br />

re-articulation <strong>of</strong> magical thought, both an elaboration and deconstruction <strong>of</strong> an ascendant<br />

positivism—simultaneously exemplary <strong>of</strong> a vestigial mode <strong>of</strong> thought and a modernist ethos,<br />

simultaneously an exemplar <strong>of</strong> modernism and a harb<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>of</strong> its dis<strong>in</strong>tegration.<br />

Lockwood’s articulation <strong>of</strong> Spiritualism clearly positioned it as a force <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration and<br />

clarity, align<strong>in</strong>g him with a positivist ethos. Lockwood placed himself and <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong><br />

Spiritualism <strong>in</strong> combat with superstition and any notions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “supernatural.” Such th<strong>in</strong>gs as<br />

communication with <strong>the</strong> dead and <strong>the</strong> various “higher faculties” associated with mediumship<br />

were to be understood as wholly consistent with natural law and thus expla<strong>in</strong>able, deny<strong>in</strong>g<br />

positivism <strong>of</strong> its o<strong>the</strong>r and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a space for spiritual matters <strong>in</strong> allowable discourse. In his<br />

attempts to expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> phenomena <strong>of</strong> Spiritualism he followed a path well trod by writers before<br />

him – argu<strong>in</strong>g that spiritualist phenomena are merely extensions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples utilized by <strong>the</strong>n<br />

current media: photography, telegraphy, phonography and telephony. Through <strong>the</strong> discussion <strong>of</strong><br />

77 Sword, 47.<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!