Adverbial and Argument-Doubling Clauses in Cree - MSpace
Adverbial and Argument-Doubling Clauses in Cree - MSpace
Adverbial and Argument-Doubling Clauses in Cree - MSpace
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NP cm be understood to be refemng to a featureless nom<strong>in</strong>al mean<strong>in</strong>g sometbg like 'the<br />
fact that.' An example, with the r-l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g relationships spelled out follows <strong>in</strong> (99).<br />
(99) nimiywêyihtên IsT [cp Op ê-sipwêhtêt]].<br />
1 -be.glad.about.it.TI-( 1 -<strong>in</strong>an) cj-leave. Ab3<br />
' 1 am glad that he is gone. ' (P: 126-25)<br />
pro,-Nmiywêyiht ên-pyi [yj pro, [, Op prok-ê-si pwêhtêt]] .<br />
1-be.gi~d abottt. it. TI-('l-<strong>in</strong>a,>) cj-ieuve. Al-3<br />
'1 am glad (about it), (the fact) that he is gone.'<br />
Thus, with a Ti verb, the only r-l<strong>in</strong>kage between the matrix verb <strong>and</strong> the A-<br />
doubl<strong>in</strong>g clause is between the conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g NP <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>animate pro object of the matrix<br />
verb. It can be seen <strong>in</strong> the above example that the subord<strong>in</strong>ate argument prok is not CO-<br />
<strong>in</strong>dexed with anyth<strong>in</strong>g; it has no l<strong>in</strong>k to the matrix clause.<br />
The im~ortant po<strong>in</strong>ts of this section have been as follows. Both adverbial <strong>and</strong><br />
argument-doubl<strong>in</strong>g clauses are <strong>in</strong> non-argument positions. <strong>Argument</strong>-doubl<strong>in</strong>g clauses are<br />
constmed with a pronom<strong>in</strong>al argument <strong>in</strong> the matrix verbal complex, <strong>and</strong> this is formally<br />
represented as referential-l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g. In order to r-l<strong>in</strong>k the A-doubl<strong>in</strong>g clause with a matrix<br />
pro, 1 have proposed that A-doubl<strong>in</strong>g clauses be treated as relative clauses, <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ard treatment of (<strong>in</strong>direct) Wh-questions. This allows the CP to be placed <strong>in</strong>side a<br />
larger conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g NP, which, be<strong>in</strong>g of like categories, can be l<strong>in</strong>ked to the pronom<strong>in</strong>al<br />
argument.