29.12.2013 Views

Analysis and Ranking of the Acoustic Disturbance Potential of ...

Analysis and Ranking of the Acoustic Disturbance Potential of ...

Analysis and Ranking of the Acoustic Disturbance Potential of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Report No. 6945<br />

BBN Systems <strong>and</strong> Technologies Corporation<br />

be used with <strong>the</strong> TL spectra in Fig. 4.1 to estimate received levels near <strong>the</strong><br />

ground. Examples <strong>of</strong> this procedure are presented in Sec. 5.3.<br />

4.2 Underwater Sound Transmission<br />

In unbounded deep water sound transmission characteristics are determined<br />

by geometric spreading loss <strong>and</strong> molecular absorption <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sound energy in<br />

<strong>the</strong> same manner as in atmospheric transmission. Molecular absorption losses<br />

are much smaller underwater, however, <strong>and</strong> are not significant for frequencies<br />

less than 5 kHz <strong>and</strong> ranges less than 5 km. Sound transmission in shallow<br />

water is.influenced by reflection losses from <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>and</strong> surface, refraction<br />

from sound speed gradients, reflection <strong>and</strong> refraction from subbottom<br />

layers, <strong>and</strong> scattering from rough surfaces. All <strong>the</strong>se effects must be<br />

considered along with geometric spreading loss to obtain estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

received level at some distance from a source.<br />

The large variability in temperature <strong>and</strong> salinity characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

Alaskan coastal waters has a significant influence on sound propagation. Two<br />

representative sound speed pr<strong>of</strong>iles are shown in Fig. 4.2. The strong surface<br />

layer condition occurs in many areas during July - September when solar heating<br />

is high. The higher temperature region near <strong>the</strong> surface is associated<br />

with a lower salinity layer produced by run<strong>of</strong>f from rivers which floats on top<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> denser ocean water. While <strong>the</strong> sound speed in fresh water is slower<br />

than that in ocean water, <strong>the</strong> temperature difference near <strong>the</strong> surface more<br />

than compensates for <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower salinity. Since sound travels<br />

faster in warm water than cold, <strong>the</strong> net effect is a downward refraction <strong>of</strong><br />

horizontally traveling sound rays. This produces more bottom reflections per<br />

kilometer <strong>and</strong> higher transmission loss than would be <strong>the</strong> case if <strong>the</strong> high<br />

sound speed surface layer did not exist.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong> November - May when <strong>the</strong> surface is generally colder<br />

than <strong>the</strong> water at depth, <strong>the</strong> sound speed pr<strong>of</strong>ile tends toward <strong>the</strong> neutral<br />

condition shown in Fig. 4.2. Under <strong>the</strong>se conditions sound is not refracted<br />

downward <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bottom on <strong>the</strong> transmission loss is reduced.<br />

In ice-covered areas, <strong>the</strong> colder region near <strong>the</strong> surface produces upward<br />

refraction so that <strong>the</strong> ice layer roughness <strong>of</strong>ten becomes a more significant<br />

influence in sound transmission loss than <strong>the</strong> bottom properties (Milne 1967).<br />

Several analysis techniques <strong>and</strong> computer-based mod-els have been developed<br />

to aid in <strong>the</strong> prediction <strong>of</strong> acoustic transmission loss characteristics (Miles<br />

et al. 1987; Malme, Smith <strong>and</strong> Miles 1986). These procedures use measured<br />

sound speed pr<strong>of</strong>iles, bottom-loss parameters, <strong>and</strong> surface loss parameters in<br />

addition to spreading loss calculations to obtain <strong>the</strong>ir results. Several<br />

models have been developed for Navy applications such as <strong>the</strong> Generic Sonar<br />

Model (Weinberg 1985). Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se are intended primarily for application<br />

to deep water areas. However, a recently developed model which is based on a<br />

procedure for solving <strong>the</strong> parabolic wave equation (Lee <strong>and</strong> Botseas 19821, can<br />

be applied to shallow water transmission. Moreover, it has provision for<br />

range-dependent parameters such a a sloping, non-uniform bottom, <strong>and</strong> rangevarying<br />

sound speed pr<strong>of</strong>iles. This l'Implicit Finite-Difference (IFD) Computer<br />

Modeln developed at <strong>the</strong> Naval Underwater Systems Center was used to compute

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!