29.12.2013 Views

Analysis and Ranking of the Acoustic Disturbance Potential of ...

Analysis and Ranking of the Acoustic Disturbance Potential of ...

Analysis and Ranking of the Acoustic Disturbance Potential of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Report No. 6945<br />

BBN Systems <strong>and</strong> Technologies Corporation<br />

Referring to Fig. 5.3, <strong>the</strong> black bars represent <strong>the</strong> SNC rating for <strong>the</strong><br />

dominant b<strong>and</strong>width <strong>of</strong> a specific source. The height <strong>of</strong> a bar is proportional<br />

to <strong>the</strong> acoustic energy density level produced by a source type in <strong>the</strong> Chukchi<br />

Sea Planning Area. The dark gray ba'rs represent <strong>the</strong> Reference SER rating<br />

which is proportional to degree <strong>of</strong> matching between <strong>the</strong> hearing response<br />

(known or assumed) <strong>of</strong> a species <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> acoustic output b<strong>and</strong>width <strong>of</strong> a source.<br />

The Reference SER r ting is based on <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong> species density<br />

in <strong>the</strong> area is l/km 3 . It is necessary to include <strong>the</strong> actual species density<br />

in <strong>the</strong> SER rating since, if <strong>the</strong> density is zero, <strong>the</strong>re is no probability <strong>of</strong><br />

acoustic interaction. Therefore, an area SER rating is also determined which<br />

includes <strong>the</strong> species density value (observed or estimated) for <strong>the</strong> area. This<br />

is shown by <strong>the</strong> light gray bars in Fig. 5.3. If <strong>the</strong> species density is very<br />

low, <strong>the</strong> area SER values will be significantly lower than <strong>the</strong> reference values<br />

showing that, while a species sensitivity for a given source may be high, <strong>the</strong><br />

probability for an acoustic interaction in a given area may be low because <strong>of</strong><br />

a low probability <strong>of</strong> encounter.<br />

In order to obtain SER values for gray whales it was necessary to derive<br />

an estimated hearing sensitivity characteristic since no measured data are<br />

available for any baleen whale (Sec. 2.3). This was done using a scaling<br />

procedure based on knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir vocalization frequency range <strong>and</strong> an<br />

assumption that <strong>the</strong>ir maximum hearing sensitivity is comparable to that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

smaller whales <strong>and</strong> pinnipeds for which data are available. Since <strong>the</strong> vocalization<br />

range <strong>of</strong> gray ihales extends to below 50 Hz, this implies that <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

hearing sensitivity is good in this range also. As a result <strong>the</strong>y may be<br />

potentially more influenced by low frequency industrial noise than are species<br />

which have extended high frequency hearing sensitivity. The estimated hearing<br />

sensitivity characteristic <strong>and</strong> its derivation are discussed in Appendix D.<br />

This estimated gray whale hearing response characteristic was used to<br />

enable SER values to be obtained for this important species. The hearing<br />

sensitivity characteristic for <strong>the</strong> walrus, which is also .unknown, was assumed<br />

to be similar to that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> California sea lion. Hearing characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> white whale have been measured <strong>and</strong> are given in Section 2.3.<br />

The SER values from Table 5.4B which are used for <strong>the</strong> graphs in Fig. 5.3<br />

show <strong>the</strong> ratings for source - species pairs which have a high potential for<br />

acoustic interaction in <strong>the</strong> Chukchi area during summer conditions. As<br />

indicated by <strong>the</strong> reference SER values, <strong>the</strong> gray whale is potentially <strong>the</strong><br />

species most influenced by all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sources. The SER rating for <strong>the</strong> seismic<br />

array - gray whale encounter is <strong>the</strong> highest in <strong>the</strong> table, followed closely by<br />

<strong>the</strong> icebreaker <strong>and</strong> KULLUK rating for <strong>the</strong> same species.<br />

The SER value for <strong>the</strong> gray whale - tug/barge encounter is lower than <strong>the</strong><br />

gray whale ratings with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r sources. While <strong>the</strong> maximum output 1/3<br />

octave b<strong>and</strong> for this type <strong>of</strong> source nearly coincides with <strong>the</strong> estimated<br />

maximum hearing sensitivity range <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gray whale, <strong>the</strong> maximum output level<br />

is more than 15 dB below that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r sources. The small craft shown in<br />

<strong>the</strong> SNC model results would also have low SER values. Thus <strong>the</strong> potential<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> noise from commercial transport <strong>and</strong> small craft activities on gray<br />

whales in <strong>the</strong> Chukchi Sea area during summer conditions is predicted to be<br />

less than produced by <strong>the</strong> oil industry activities used in <strong>the</strong> modeling

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!