29.12.2013 Views

Analysis and Ranking of the Acoustic Disturbance Potential of ...

Analysis and Ranking of the Acoustic Disturbance Potential of ...

Analysis and Ranking of the Acoustic Disturbance Potential of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Report No. 6945<br />

BBN Systems arid Technologies Corporation<br />

otariids have slightly greater sensitivity <strong>and</strong>,a more elevated high frequency<br />

cut<strong>of</strong>f than do phocids (Bullock et al. 1971; Schusterman 1981; Moore <strong>and</strong><br />

Schusterman 1987; Fig. 2.27). The cut<strong>of</strong>f frequency <strong>of</strong> otariid hearing in air<br />

is about 32 to 36 kHz, not much lower than <strong>the</strong> underwater cut<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> 36-40 kHz<br />

(Schusterman 1981). In contrast, <strong>the</strong> in-air cut<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> harbor seal is<br />

around 20 kHz, considerably lower than its underwater cut<strong>of</strong>f around 60 kHz.<br />

Based on behavioral experiments, both otariids <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> harbor seal are most<br />

sensitive at 2 kHz <strong>and</strong> at 8-16 kHz <strong>and</strong> notably less sensitive at <strong>the</strong><br />

intermediate 4 kHz frequency (Fig. 2.27). These animals are also similar to<br />

one ano<strong>the</strong>r in that all suffer some loss <strong>of</strong> hearing sensitivity in air<br />

relative to water when results are expressed in directly comparable units,<br />

i.e., in dB re 1 pw/cm2 (Mdhl 1968a; Moore <strong>and</strong> Schusterman 1987).<br />

2.3.4 Effects <strong>of</strong> sound duration<br />

Signal duration influences <strong>the</strong> hearing threshold, at least under some<br />

circumstances. Almost all behavioral studies on hearing sensitivity have<br />

employed pure tones that were played to <strong>the</strong> test animals for at least 1/2 s,<br />

<strong>and</strong> in some cases <strong>the</strong> animals were allowed to control signal duration.<br />

However, Johnson (1968a) used tones <strong>of</strong> variable duration, including some that<br />

were much shorter than those generally employed. Frequencies ranged from<br />

Figure 2.27.<br />

In-Air Audiograms <strong>of</strong> Several Pinnipeds: California Sea Lion<br />

(Moore <strong>and</strong> Schusterman 1987); Average <strong>of</strong> Two Fur Seals (Moore<br />

<strong>and</strong> Schusterman 1987); Harp Seal (Terhune <strong>and</strong> Ronald 1971); <strong>and</strong><br />

Harbor Seal (M6hl 1968a).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!