06.01.2014 Views

Annual report of the Town of Hampton, New Hampshire

Annual report of the Town of Hampton, New Hampshire

Annual report of the Town of Hampton, New Hampshire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TOWN OF HAMPTON, NEW HAMPSHIRE<br />

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />

DECEMBER 31, 1998<br />

C. Year 2000 Computer Systems and Equipment Issue<br />

The year 2000 issue is <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> problems and shortcomings in computer systems and equipment<br />

that has <strong>the</strong> potential to adversely affect operations beyond <strong>the</strong> year 1999. Basically, <strong>the</strong> problem<br />

is attributed to <strong>the</strong> shortsightedness <strong>of</strong> programmers who eliminated <strong>the</strong> first two digits in writing<br />

<strong>the</strong> year in computer programs. This could cause a system to ei<strong>the</strong>r process inaccurately or to shut<br />

down altoge<strong>the</strong>r. Ano<strong>the</strong>r factor that may affect systems is <strong>the</strong> leap year calculation for <strong>the</strong> year<br />

2000. Generally accepted accounting principles require that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hampton</strong> disclose its<br />

status relative to <strong>the</strong> year 2000 anticipated computer problems. To this end, <strong>the</strong> Governmental<br />

Accounting Standards Board has described four stages that governmental entities should pass<br />

through in order to become year 2000 compliant. These stages are:<br />

Awareness Stage - Where a budget and project plan for dealing with <strong>the</strong> year 2000 issue is<br />

developed.<br />

Assessment Stage - When <strong>the</strong> entity actually begins to review and identify all <strong>of</strong> its systems and<br />

components. The organization may ei<strong>the</strong>r review all system components for year 2000 compliance<br />

or identify through a risk analysis, only those that are mission-critical and evaluate those for<br />

compliance.<br />

Remediation Stage - When changes are actually made to systems and equipment.<br />

primarily with <strong>the</strong> technical issues <strong>of</strong> converting or switching systems.<br />

This stage deals<br />

Validation/Testing Stage - When <strong>the</strong> entity actually validates and tests <strong>the</strong> changes made during<br />

<strong>the</strong> conversion.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> testing indicates problems, <strong>the</strong> tested area needs to be corrected and retested.<br />

As <strong>of</strong> December 31, 1998, management believes <strong>the</strong>y have completed <strong>the</strong> Assessment Stage and are<br />

beginning <strong>the</strong> Remediation Stage. Year 2000 compliance is an issue for <strong>the</strong> Telecommunications,<br />

Water/Sewer Flow and Financial Reporting systems <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hampton</strong>. $40,000 has been<br />

committed to make <strong>the</strong> <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hampton</strong>'s systems year 2000 compliant and <strong>of</strong> this amount<br />

$40,000 has already been spent as <strong>of</strong> December 31, 1998. Additional money is expected to be<br />

approved at <strong>the</strong> 1999 <strong>Town</strong> meeting for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Town</strong> to complete <strong>the</strong> final two stages.<br />

NOTE 7 - RESTATEMENT OF FUND BALANCES<br />

In compliance with GASB Statement #31, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Certain Investments<br />

and for External Investment Pools, investments are <strong>report</strong>ed at fair value. In <strong>the</strong> past, prior to <strong>the</strong><br />

effective date for <strong>the</strong> statement, investments were <strong>report</strong>ed at cost. The beginning fund balance has<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore been restated as follows to reflect this difference in <strong>report</strong>ing:<br />

Nonexpendable Trust Funds<br />

12/31/97 Fund balance, as previously <strong>report</strong>ed $13,662,327<br />

Increase due to change in fair value 46.779<br />

12/31/97 Fund balance, as restated $13.709.106<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!