11.02.2014 Views

ASEAN: Regional Trends in Economic Integration, Export ... - USITC

ASEAN: Regional Trends in Economic Integration, Export ... - USITC

ASEAN: Regional Trends in Economic Integration, Export ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BOX 2.4 What is ATIGA?<br />

ATIGA builds on the commitments under the follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>ASEAN</strong> economic <strong>in</strong>itiatives: the Agreement on <strong>ASEAN</strong><br />

Preferential Trad<strong>in</strong>g Arrangements (1977), the Agreement on the Common Effective Preferential Tariff Scheme for<br />

the <strong>ASEAN</strong> Free Trade Area (1992), the <strong>ASEAN</strong> Agreement on Customs (1987), the <strong>ASEAN</strong> Framework Agreement<br />

on Mutual Recognition Arrangements (1998), the e-<strong>ASEAN</strong> Framework Agreement (2000), the Protocol Govern<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the Implementation of the <strong>ASEAN</strong> Harmonized Tariff Nomenclature (2003), the <strong>ASEAN</strong> Framework Agreement for<br />

the <strong>Integration</strong> of Priority Sectors (2004), and the Agreement to Establish and Implement the <strong>ASEAN</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gle W<strong>in</strong>dow<br />

(2005). Member states are to agree on the list of agreements to be superseded by ATIGA with<strong>in</strong> six months from the<br />

date of ATIGA’s entry <strong>in</strong>to force (by November 17, 2010).<br />

Among the provisions of ATIGA are those cover<strong>in</strong>g tariff liberalization schedules and commitments, rules of orig<strong>in</strong><br />

(which require regional value content of 40 percent or a change <strong>in</strong> tariff head<strong>in</strong>g), a NTMs, trade facilitation, customs<br />

procedures, standards and conformance, sanitary and phytosanitary measures, and trade remedy measures (as<br />

provided for <strong>in</strong> the WTO). To improve transparency, ATIGA requires member state notification of actions and<br />

measures they <strong>in</strong>tend to take with respect to tariffs, NTMs, standards, SPS, and other measures; b requires publication<br />

of trade laws, regulations, and judicial decisions <strong>in</strong> accordance with article X of GATT 1994; and establishes a trade<br />

repository, which will publish on the Internet all member state trade and customs laws, measures, and procedures,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g tariff schedules. The trade repository will <strong>in</strong>clude a database of NTMs, with a view to identify<strong>in</strong>g NTMs for<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ation. c Relevant <strong>ASEAN</strong> bodies are required to review any NTM notified or reported by any other member state<br />

or by the private sector with a view to determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether the measure constitutes a nontariff barrier. ATIGA<br />

specifies deadl<strong>in</strong>es for the elim<strong>in</strong>ation of identified nontariff barriers: by 2010 for the <strong>ASEAN</strong>-5, 2012 for the<br />

Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, and 2015 (with flexibilities to 2018) for the <strong>ASEAN</strong>-4. ATIGA also seeks to prevent member states from<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g new NTMs that are <strong>in</strong>consistent with WTO obligations. d<br />

ATIGA provides guidance on the development and application of standards, technical regulations, and conformity<br />

assessment procedures, which are to be transparent and consistent with <strong>in</strong>ternational standards and practice. It also<br />

directs member states to develop and implement sectoral Mutual Recognition Arrangements (MRAs) and harmonized<br />

regulatory regimes. ATIGA <strong>in</strong>cludes an MRA on conformity assessment with respect to electrical and electronic<br />

equipment, and two agreements on harmonized regulatory regimes (for electrical equipment and cosmetics). e<br />

a ATIGA, 22.<br />

b See ATIGA, Annex 1.<br />

c Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Secretariat, there is an outdated list of NTMs, which currently conta<strong>in</strong>s 7,378 NTMs, of which 43.9 percent<br />

are non-automatic licenses. Other categories are automatic licenses, quotas, prohibitions and quantitative restrictions, and tariff-rate<br />

quotas. Government official, <strong>in</strong>terview by <strong>USITC</strong> staff, S<strong>in</strong>gapore, March 1, 2010. The database can be found at<br />

http://www.aseansec.org/16355.htm.<br />

d ATIGA, articles 40–42.<br />

e <strong>ASEAN</strong> economic m<strong>in</strong>isters signed an MRA for pharmaceutical products <strong>in</strong> 2009.<br />

Intra-<strong>ASEAN</strong> trade trends<br />

Two measures are typically cited to show trends <strong>in</strong> regional trade <strong>in</strong>tegration—the<br />

<strong>in</strong>traregional trade share and the <strong>in</strong>traregional trade <strong>in</strong>tensity. 33 The <strong>in</strong>traregional trade<br />

share for <strong>ASEAN</strong> shows the share of total <strong>ASEAN</strong> trade that is accounted for by <strong>in</strong>tra-<br />

<strong>ASEAN</strong> trade. 34 As shown <strong>in</strong> figure 2.1, <strong>in</strong>tra-<strong>ASEAN</strong> trade decreased slightly as a share<br />

of total <strong>ASEAN</strong> trade between 2005 and 2009, decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g from 25 to 24 percent. It<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s smaller than that of other regional groups, such as the EU-15, the members of the<br />

North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and broader East Asia group<strong>in</strong>gs that<br />

33 Capannelli, Lee, and Petri, “Develop<strong>in</strong>g Indicators for <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Integration</strong> and<br />

Cooperation,” September 2009, 5; Plummer and Chia, “Assess<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>Economic</strong>s of the <strong>ASEAN</strong> <strong>Economic</strong><br />

Community: Introduction,” 2009, 8.<br />

34 Intraregional trade shares are upward biased because of double count<strong>in</strong>g, which results from both<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gapore’s entrepot role and production fragmentation.<br />

2-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!