BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
nutrients, underwater noise, oil spills, and <strong>the</strong><br />
spread<strong>in</strong>g of alien species. Many of <strong>the</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e protected<br />
areas (MPAs), which have been established<br />
to protect <strong>the</strong> unique mar<strong>in</strong>e nature of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong><br />
<strong>Sea</strong> from human impact, are close to heavily trafficked<br />
areas (Figure 6.2.1).<br />
Maritime traffic is addressed by one of <strong>the</strong> four<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> segments of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> Action Plan (BSAP).<br />
A number of management objectives have been<br />
established to <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> areas of concern<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g, e.g., ’Safe maritime traffic without accidental<br />
pollution’, ‘M<strong>in</strong>imum sewage pollution from<br />
ships’, ‘No <strong>in</strong>troductions of alien species from ships’,<br />
and ‘M<strong>in</strong>imum air pollution from ships’.<br />
6.2.1 Impacts of maritime traffic on<br />
biodiversity<br />
Nutrient <strong>in</strong>puts<br />
Shipp<strong>in</strong>g activity contributes to <strong>the</strong> eutrophication<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> through emissions of nitrogen<br />
oxides (NOx) and discharges of nitrogen and<br />
phosphorus conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> sewage (for impacts on<br />
biodiversity, see Chapter 6.5, Eutrophication). NOx<br />
emitted to air is deposited both directly onto <strong>the</strong><br />
sea surface and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> catchment area, from where<br />
part of <strong>the</strong> nitrogen dra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> sea via rivers.<br />
NOx deposited onto <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> is particularly<br />
effective <strong>in</strong> caus<strong>in</strong>g eutrophication because it is<br />
directly available for use by primary producers.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Co-operative Programme for<br />
Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and Evaluation of <strong>the</strong> Long-Range<br />
Transmission of Air Pollutants <strong>in</strong> Europe, EMEP<br />
(Bartnicki 2007), shipp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> contributed<br />
9% of <strong>the</strong> total airborne nitrogen deposition<br />
directly to <strong>the</strong> sea <strong>in</strong> 2005. The major share of<br />
nutrients to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> enters as waterborne <strong>in</strong>put<br />
from <strong>the</strong> catchment area (Knuuttila 2007) and<br />
shipp<strong>in</strong>g contributes only about 2% of <strong>the</strong> total<br />
nitrogen <strong>in</strong>puts to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> (Table 6.2.1). A<br />
recent study, however, suggests that, based on<br />
NOx emissions from ships, nitrogen deposition may<br />
be somewhat higher than previously estimated<br />
(Stipa et al. 2007). With a projected 2.6% annual<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> shipp<strong>in</strong>g traffic <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong>, and assum<strong>in</strong>g<br />
no abatement measures, <strong>the</strong> estimated annual<br />
<strong>in</strong>put of NOx from maritime traffic alone has been<br />
estimated to <strong>in</strong>crease by roughly 50% until 2030<br />
(Stipa et al. 2007, IMO document MEPC 57/INF14).<br />
Nitrogen loads to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
ships’ sewage discharges have been estimated to<br />
represent about 0.05% of <strong>the</strong> total waterborne<br />
nitrogen load and up to 0.5% of <strong>the</strong> total phosphorus<br />
load to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> (Table 6.2.1) (Huhta<br />
et al. 2007). These figures have been calculated<br />
based on <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong>re is no sewage<br />
treatment onboard ships (cargo ships, cruise ships<br />
and passenger/car ferries) and that all sewage is<br />
discharged <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> sea, i.e., <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical worstcase<br />
scenario. The proportion of nutrients orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from ships’ sewage water is thus relatively small<br />
compared to <strong>the</strong> total nutrient load to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong><br />
<strong>Sea</strong>. Nutrients <strong>in</strong> sewage discharge may never<strong>the</strong>less<br />
have considerable effects on <strong>the</strong> growth of<br />
pelagic phytoplankton because <strong>the</strong> nutrients are<br />
discharged directly to <strong>the</strong> open sea ecosystem. The<br />
amount of total nitrogen discharges from commercial<br />
ship traffic is comparable to <strong>the</strong> 500 tonnes<br />
of annual nitrogen load from <strong>the</strong> city of Hels<strong>in</strong>ki<br />
sewage treatment plant, which purifies <strong>the</strong> sewage<br />
of approximately 1 million people (Huuska & Mi<strong>in</strong>ala<strong>in</strong>en<br />
2007).<br />
Table 6.2.1. Magnitude of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) <strong>in</strong>puts from shipp<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g nitrogen deposition<br />
from airborne emissions and sewage, and total waterborne and airborne load<strong>in</strong>g of nitrogen and<br />
phosphorus to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>. Note that <strong>the</strong> estimates concern ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> year 2000 or 2005.<br />
Nitrogen Total N <strong>in</strong> 10 3 tonnes NOx <strong>in</strong> 10 3 tonnes<br />
Airborne N deposition from <strong>Baltic</strong> shipp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2005 1 19 14<br />
Total deposition of airborne N to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2005 1 208 86<br />
Sewage N from <strong>Baltic</strong> shipp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2000 2 0.47 -<br />
Waterborne load<strong>in</strong>g of N to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2005 3 620 300<br />
Phosphorus<br />
Total P <strong>in</strong> 10 3 tonnes<br />
Sewage P from <strong>Baltic</strong> shipp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2000 2 0.16 -<br />
Waterborne load<strong>in</strong>g of P to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2005 3 29 -<br />
1)<br />
Bartnicki 2007; 2) Huhta et al. 2007; 3) Knuuttila 2007.<br />
99