BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
predation on nests and nest<strong>in</strong>g adults, predation<br />
by white-tailed eagles on nest<strong>in</strong>g adults may affect<br />
<strong>the</strong> number of breed<strong>in</strong>g pairs <strong>in</strong> some colonies.<br />
The total number of barnacle geese <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> is<br />
currently estimated at about 25 000 <strong>in</strong>dividuals.<br />
Reproductive success, measured as <strong>the</strong> number of<br />
fledged young per pair, has been shown to be density-dependent<br />
and variable among years (Larsson<br />
& Forslund 1994). The amount of high-quality<br />
grass available around <strong>the</strong> colonies for newly<br />
hatched chicks <strong>in</strong> May and June, as well as predation<br />
by gulls, determ<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> production of fledged<br />
young. Annual survival rates of adults and fledged<br />
young are high. Only limited hunt<strong>in</strong>g is permitted<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> region.<br />
Many, but not all, large colonies of barnacle geese<br />
on Gotland and Öland are situated with<strong>in</strong> protected<br />
areas. The colonies <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land, Estonia, ma<strong>in</strong>land<br />
Sweden, Denmark, and Germany range <strong>in</strong> size from<br />
a few pairs to several hundred pairs (Leito 1996,<br />
Mortensen & Hansen 1999, SOF 2006, Koop 1998,<br />
Mikkola-Roos et al. 2008). Some of <strong>the</strong> latter colonies<br />
have probably been founded by birds of captive<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>. However, birds from such colonies usually<br />
cannot be dist<strong>in</strong>guished from o<strong>the</strong>r birds.<br />
Eider (Somateria mollissima)<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g areas of <strong>the</strong> eider <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> are Sweden (270 000–360 000<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g females, bf, <strong>in</strong> 1999/2000), F<strong>in</strong>land<br />
(80 000–100 000 bf <strong>in</strong> 2007), Denmark (25 000<br />
bf 1990–2000), and Estonia (15 000 bf <strong>in</strong> 1995)<br />
(BirdLife International 2004, Desholm et al. 2002,<br />
Hario & R<strong>in</strong>tala 2008). The species also occurs <strong>in</strong><br />
small numbers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Russian part of <strong>the</strong> Gulf of<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land (70–80 bf) and at <strong>the</strong> German <strong>Baltic</strong> coast<br />
(80–100 bf <strong>in</strong> 2008). The eider does not breed,<br />
or breeds only exceptionally, <strong>in</strong> Poland, Lithuania,<br />
Latvia, and <strong>the</strong> Kal<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>grad region of Russia.<br />
The eider population showed a strong long-term<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease throughout <strong>the</strong> 20th century. Simultaneously,<br />
it extended its breed<strong>in</strong>g range southwards<br />
to <strong>the</strong> German <strong>Baltic</strong> coast, where <strong>the</strong><br />
first breed<strong>in</strong>g was recorded <strong>in</strong> 1985. However,<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> late 1990s, stagnant or even strongly<br />
decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g population trends have been observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> several countries (Denmark, Sweden, F<strong>in</strong>land,<br />
Estonia; Desholm et al. 2002, Elts et al. 2008,<br />
Figure 4.3.5). In F<strong>in</strong>land, <strong>the</strong> eider is currently<br />
<strong>the</strong> most rapidly decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g seabird species, dropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
down from 150 000–180 000 bf <strong>in</strong> 2001 to<br />
only 80 000–100 000 bf <strong>in</strong> 2007 (Hario & R<strong>in</strong>tala<br />
2008).<br />
This decl<strong>in</strong>e is true not only for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
population, but also for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong>/Wadden<br />
<strong>Sea</strong> flyway population as a whole. Mid-w<strong>in</strong>ter<br />
counts suggest that <strong>the</strong> total population may have<br />
fallen from 1.2 million birds <strong>in</strong> 1991 to 760 000 <strong>in</strong><br />
2000, which is a reduction of 36% (Desholm et al.<br />
2002) 5. Although reductions are evident for several<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g areas, <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e of <strong>the</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g population<br />
along <strong>the</strong> flyway seems to be less pronounced<br />
compared to <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter population. Shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g of breed<strong>in</strong>g and w<strong>in</strong>ter<strong>in</strong>g<br />
numbers, as well as an unknown buffer<strong>in</strong>g effect<br />
of non-breeders, are probably <strong>the</strong> reasons for <strong>the</strong><br />
difference (Desholm at al. 2002).<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g females<br />
25000<br />
20000<br />
15000<br />
10000<br />
5000<br />
Denmark<br />
Estonia<br />
The recent population development may be <strong>in</strong>fluenced<br />
by several factors, among <strong>the</strong>m hunt<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
predation by m<strong>in</strong>k and white-tailed eagle, bacterial<br />
and viral <strong>in</strong>fections, parasite <strong>in</strong>festations, drown<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g gear, and oil<strong>in</strong>g. Low reproductive<br />
success and high mortality of duckl<strong>in</strong>gs have been<br />
reported from several breed<strong>in</strong>g areas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> most<br />
recent years. However, several of <strong>the</strong> factors mentioned<br />
above affected <strong>the</strong> population already <strong>in</strong><br />
74<br />
0<br />
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />
Figure 4.3.5. Development of <strong>the</strong> eider population <strong>in</strong> Denmark and<br />
Estonia dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 20th century. Data from Desholm et al. (2002),<br />
Lyngs (2000 and unpublished), and Elts et al. (2008).<br />
5<br />
These population numbers are probably underestimates<br />
because <strong>the</strong>y reflect <strong>the</strong> counted numbers without any<br />
attempt to correct for birds that have not been seen.<br />
Noer et al. (1995) estimated a population size of 1.5–2.0<br />
million birds <strong>in</strong> 1990. However, <strong>the</strong> estimated decrease of<br />
approximately 30%, giv<strong>in</strong>g a total population of about<br />
1.0–1.2 million birds <strong>in</strong> 2000, seems to be realistic (Noer,<br />
pers. comm.).