04.03.2014 Views

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

predation on nests and nest<strong>in</strong>g adults, predation<br />

by white-tailed eagles on nest<strong>in</strong>g adults may affect<br />

<strong>the</strong> number of breed<strong>in</strong>g pairs <strong>in</strong> some colonies.<br />

The total number of barnacle geese <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> is<br />

currently estimated at about 25 000 <strong>in</strong>dividuals.<br />

Reproductive success, measured as <strong>the</strong> number of<br />

fledged young per pair, has been shown to be density-dependent<br />

and variable among years (Larsson<br />

& Forslund 1994). The amount of high-quality<br />

grass available around <strong>the</strong> colonies for newly<br />

hatched chicks <strong>in</strong> May and June, as well as predation<br />

by gulls, determ<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> production of fledged<br />

young. Annual survival rates of adults and fledged<br />

young are high. Only limited hunt<strong>in</strong>g is permitted<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> region.<br />

Many, but not all, large colonies of barnacle geese<br />

on Gotland and Öland are situated with<strong>in</strong> protected<br />

areas. The colonies <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land, Estonia, ma<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Sweden, Denmark, and Germany range <strong>in</strong> size from<br />

a few pairs to several hundred pairs (Leito 1996,<br />

Mortensen & Hansen 1999, SOF 2006, Koop 1998,<br />

Mikkola-Roos et al. 2008). Some of <strong>the</strong> latter colonies<br />

have probably been founded by birds of captive<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>. However, birds from such colonies usually<br />

cannot be dist<strong>in</strong>guished from o<strong>the</strong>r birds.<br />

Eider (Somateria mollissima)<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g areas of <strong>the</strong> eider <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> are Sweden (270 000–360 000<br />

breed<strong>in</strong>g females, bf, <strong>in</strong> 1999/2000), F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

(80 000–100 000 bf <strong>in</strong> 2007), Denmark (25 000<br />

bf 1990–2000), and Estonia (15 000 bf <strong>in</strong> 1995)<br />

(BirdLife International 2004, Desholm et al. 2002,<br />

Hario & R<strong>in</strong>tala 2008). The species also occurs <strong>in</strong><br />

small numbers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Russian part of <strong>the</strong> Gulf of<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land (70–80 bf) and at <strong>the</strong> German <strong>Baltic</strong> coast<br />

(80–100 bf <strong>in</strong> 2008). The eider does not breed,<br />

or breeds only exceptionally, <strong>in</strong> Poland, Lithuania,<br />

Latvia, and <strong>the</strong> Kal<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>grad region of Russia.<br />

The eider population showed a strong long-term<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease throughout <strong>the</strong> 20th century. Simultaneously,<br />

it extended its breed<strong>in</strong>g range southwards<br />

to <strong>the</strong> German <strong>Baltic</strong> coast, where <strong>the</strong><br />

first breed<strong>in</strong>g was recorded <strong>in</strong> 1985. However,<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> late 1990s, stagnant or even strongly<br />

decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g population trends have been observed<br />

<strong>in</strong> several countries (Denmark, Sweden, F<strong>in</strong>land,<br />

Estonia; Desholm et al. 2002, Elts et al. 2008,<br />

Figure 4.3.5). In F<strong>in</strong>land, <strong>the</strong> eider is currently<br />

<strong>the</strong> most rapidly decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g seabird species, dropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

down from 150 000–180 000 bf <strong>in</strong> 2001 to<br />

only 80 000–100 000 bf <strong>in</strong> 2007 (Hario & R<strong>in</strong>tala<br />

2008).<br />

This decl<strong>in</strong>e is true not only for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

population, but also for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong>/Wadden<br />

<strong>Sea</strong> flyway population as a whole. Mid-w<strong>in</strong>ter<br />

counts suggest that <strong>the</strong> total population may have<br />

fallen from 1.2 million birds <strong>in</strong> 1991 to 760 000 <strong>in</strong><br />

2000, which is a reduction of 36% (Desholm et al.<br />

2002) 5. Although reductions are evident for several<br />

breed<strong>in</strong>g areas, <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e of <strong>the</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g population<br />

along <strong>the</strong> flyway seems to be less pronounced<br />

compared to <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter population. Shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g of breed<strong>in</strong>g and w<strong>in</strong>ter<strong>in</strong>g<br />

numbers, as well as an unknown buffer<strong>in</strong>g effect<br />

of non-breeders, are probably <strong>the</strong> reasons for <strong>the</strong><br />

difference (Desholm at al. 2002).<br />

Breed<strong>in</strong>g females<br />

25000<br />

20000<br />

15000<br />

10000<br />

5000<br />

Denmark<br />

Estonia<br />

The recent population development may be <strong>in</strong>fluenced<br />

by several factors, among <strong>the</strong>m hunt<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

predation by m<strong>in</strong>k and white-tailed eagle, bacterial<br />

and viral <strong>in</strong>fections, parasite <strong>in</strong>festations, drown<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g gear, and oil<strong>in</strong>g. Low reproductive<br />

success and high mortality of duckl<strong>in</strong>gs have been<br />

reported from several breed<strong>in</strong>g areas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> most<br />

recent years. However, several of <strong>the</strong> factors mentioned<br />

above affected <strong>the</strong> population already <strong>in</strong><br />

74<br />

0<br />

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />

Figure 4.3.5. Development of <strong>the</strong> eider population <strong>in</strong> Denmark and<br />

Estonia dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 20th century. Data from Desholm et al. (2002),<br />

Lyngs (2000 and unpublished), and Elts et al. (2008).<br />

5<br />

These population numbers are probably underestimates<br />

because <strong>the</strong>y reflect <strong>the</strong> counted numbers without any<br />

attempt to correct for birds that have not been seen.<br />

Noer et al. (1995) estimated a population size of 1.5–2.0<br />

million birds <strong>in</strong> 1990. However, <strong>the</strong> estimated decrease of<br />

approximately 30%, giv<strong>in</strong>g a total population of about<br />

1.0–1.2 million birds <strong>in</strong> 2000, seems to be realistic (Noer,<br />

pers. comm.).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!