04.03.2014 Views

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mud-sandflat, Greifswald Lagoon, Germany<br />

28<br />

Boreal <strong>Baltic</strong> narrow <strong>in</strong>lets are only reported<br />

from F<strong>in</strong>land and Sweden. In both cases, <strong>the</strong> conservation<br />

status is <strong>in</strong>adequate. For <strong>the</strong> implementation<br />

of <strong>the</strong> EU Habitats Directive, <strong>the</strong>y are only<br />

assessed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU Boreal Region. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

HELCOM (1998), <strong>the</strong>y are assessed as endangered<br />

<strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land and Sweden.<br />

Country-by-country assessment<br />

In Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, <strong>the</strong> conservation<br />

status of all habitat types reported under<br />

<strong>the</strong> Habitats Directive is favourable. In Denmark,<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land, Germany and Sweden, <strong>the</strong> conservation<br />

status is predom<strong>in</strong>antly unfavourable. In Poland,<br />

<strong>the</strong> conservation status of reported natural<br />

habitat types is <strong>in</strong>adequate <strong>in</strong> three and favourable<br />

<strong>in</strong> two habitat types.<br />

For Russia, it is only possible to consider <strong>the</strong><br />

HELCOM Red List of Biotopes because <strong>the</strong> Russian<br />

Federation is not an EU Member State. The threat<br />

categories for most biotope types and complexes <strong>in</strong><br />

Russian waters <strong>in</strong> and off <strong>the</strong> Kal<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>grad oblast are<br />

between endangered and heavily endangered (2–3),<br />

whereas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gulf of F<strong>in</strong>land many are presumably<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> category Not Endangered at present.<br />

In conclusion, <strong>the</strong> conservation status of <strong>the</strong><br />

natural habitat types <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> HELCOM List and <strong>in</strong><br />

Annex 1 of <strong>the</strong> Habitats Directive is assessed very<br />

differently by HELCOM EU Member States. Table<br />

2.2.1 makes it clear that some countries judge<br />

habitat types as be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a favourable conservation<br />

status even though <strong>the</strong>y are threatened<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> HELCOM List of Biotopes. Moreover,<br />

it is obvious that some HELCOM EU countries<br />

have reported some natural habitat types<br />

as be<strong>in</strong>g not present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir mar<strong>in</strong>e or coastal<br />

area to <strong>the</strong> European Commission, although <strong>the</strong>y<br />

have been assessed as be<strong>in</strong>g threatened <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

country accord<strong>in</strong>g to HELCOM (1998).<br />

Assessment of o<strong>the</strong>r habitats/biotopes<br />

In addition to <strong>the</strong> above Natura 2000 natural<br />

habitat types, <strong>the</strong> HELCOM List (HELCOM 2007b)<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g habitat/biotope types: (1)<br />

Offshore (deep) waters below <strong>the</strong> halocl<strong>in</strong>e, (2)<br />

Shell gravel bottoms, (3) <strong>Sea</strong>grass beds, (4) Macrophyte<br />

meadows and beds, (5) Gravel bottoms with<br />

Ophelia species, (6) Maerl beds, and (7) <strong>Sea</strong> pens<br />

with burrow<strong>in</strong>g megafauna.<br />

Offshore (deep) waters below <strong>the</strong> halocl<strong>in</strong>e occur<br />

<strong>in</strong> all ma<strong>in</strong> bas<strong>in</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> area. They are<br />

threatened where <strong>the</strong>y appear and are assessed for<br />

<strong>the</strong> whole area as heavily endangered (HELCOM<br />

1998). <strong>Sea</strong>grass beds with Zostera mar<strong>in</strong>a occur<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> area south of <strong>the</strong> Bothnian <strong>Sea</strong>,<br />

whereas seagrass beds with Zostera noltii are<br />

restricted to <strong>the</strong> southwestern and sou<strong>the</strong>rn parts<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> area <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Bay of Mecklenburg<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Gulf of Gdansk. <strong>Sea</strong>grass beds are<br />

among <strong>the</strong> most threatened mar<strong>in</strong>e biotopes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> area. They are part of <strong>the</strong> heavily endangered<br />

HELCOM biotope type ‘Level sandy bottoms<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ated by macrophyte vegetation‘ (HELCOM<br />

1998). Macrophyte meadows and beds (o<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

seagrass beds) occur on soft and hard bottoms<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> area (HELCOM 2007b).<br />

From a <strong>Baltic</strong>-wide perspective, <strong>the</strong> exact status of<br />

threat and/or decl<strong>in</strong>e is not yet known. However<br />

<strong>the</strong> biotope is threatened and decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g where it<br />

appears, because characteristic species are not<br />

recorded at <strong>the</strong> same water depths as before. They

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!