04.03.2014 Views

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Box 6.7.1. Invasion status of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> as of April 2008<br />

Number of species 1)<br />

Number of alien species recorded 120<br />

Number of established 2) species 77<br />

– of which ship-mediated species 40<br />

Major groups 3)<br />

Crustaceans (shrimps, crabs, etc.) 23<br />

Molluscs (snails, mussels, clams, etc.) 9<br />

Fish 8<br />

Oligochaetes 7<br />

Polychaetes (bristle worms) 4<br />

1)<br />

Includ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Kattegat.<br />

2)<br />

A few species with unknown status are to be added (<strong>in</strong> total 25<br />

species).<br />

3)<br />

Only species known to be established were taken <strong>in</strong>to account.<br />

Cergopagis pengoi<br />

Source: <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> Alien Species Database (http://www.corpi.ku.lt/<br />

nemo; update: 10 April 2008)<br />

some of <strong>the</strong> most recent <strong>in</strong>vaders have shown a<br />

very rapid expansion. One of <strong>the</strong> best-documented<br />

<strong>in</strong>vasions is that of <strong>the</strong> benthic bristle worm Marenzelleria<br />

spp. that currently occurs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire <strong>Baltic</strong><br />

<strong>Sea</strong> and has become common <strong>in</strong> many soft-bottom<br />

habitats and is even a dom<strong>in</strong>ant species <strong>in</strong> some<br />

bottom communities; this has occurred <strong>in</strong> only <strong>the</strong><br />

roughly ten years s<strong>in</strong>ce its first appearance (Zettler<br />

1996, Cederwall et al. 1999, Perus & Bonsdorff<br />

2004, Figure 6.7.2). Recent genetic studies have also<br />

revealed that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vasion has been made by three<br />

different species (M. viridis, M. neglecta and M.<br />

arctia) that obviously are still expand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir range<br />

(Blank et al. 2008). O<strong>the</strong>r recent alien species with<br />

a rapid <strong>in</strong>vasion over large sea areas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>clude pelagic species such as <strong>the</strong> fishhook water<br />

flea Cercopagis pengoi and <strong>the</strong> American comb<br />

jelly Mnemiopsis leidyi. However, <strong>in</strong> 2009 scientists<br />

carried out genetic analyses of samples of M. leidyi<br />

and found out that specimen recently identified<br />

as M. leidyi were <strong>in</strong> fact Mertensia ovum, an arctic<br />

comb jelly (Maiju Leht<strong>in</strong>iemi, pers. comm.). American<br />

comb jelly M. leidyi, never<strong>the</strong>less, occurs at least<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> and elsewhere, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>vasion<br />

rate (Figure 6.7.1, Box 6.7.2) can be related<br />

to several factors: (i) <strong>in</strong>creased number and size<br />

of ships, (ii) <strong>in</strong>creased speed of ships, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

better survival of organisms dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> voyage,<br />

(iii) use of separate tanks <strong>in</strong>stead of cargo tanks<br />

for ballast water (less polluted ballast water), (iv)<br />

Box 6.7.2. How do we know which species is a human-mediated newcomer? *)<br />

120<br />

For most of <strong>the</strong> alien species recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is evidence of <strong>the</strong>ir orig<strong>in</strong> achieved through studies of:<br />

• paleontological and archaeological records (absence of<br />

shells and o<strong>the</strong>r remnants),<br />

• historical data (absence <strong>in</strong> previous surveys and check lists,<br />

documented first collection or first release),<br />

• biogeographical patterns (discont<strong>in</strong>uous distribution, known<br />

as <strong>in</strong>troduced from o<strong>the</strong>r regions),<br />

• dispersal mechanisms (l<strong>in</strong>ks to human-mediated vectors,<br />

direct evidence of transport),<br />

• molecular genetic evidence, and<br />

• ecological evidence (short larval survival time, community<br />

association (e.g., foul<strong>in</strong>g on ship hulls), post-<strong>in</strong>troduction<br />

range expansion).<br />

However, it is often difficult to determ<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r a<br />

species is native or <strong>in</strong>troduced; such species with an<br />

unknown orig<strong>in</strong> are termed cryptogenic (Carlton 1996).<br />

*) Based on lectures given <strong>in</strong> 1997 by Prof. James T. Carlton<br />

(Williams College, Mystic, Connecticut, USA) at Åbo Akademi<br />

University.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!