BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Box 6.7.1. Invasion status of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> as of April 2008<br />
Number of species 1)<br />
Number of alien species recorded 120<br />
Number of established 2) species 77<br />
– of which ship-mediated species 40<br />
Major groups 3)<br />
Crustaceans (shrimps, crabs, etc.) 23<br />
Molluscs (snails, mussels, clams, etc.) 9<br />
Fish 8<br />
Oligochaetes 7<br />
Polychaetes (bristle worms) 4<br />
1)<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Kattegat.<br />
2)<br />
A few species with unknown status are to be added (<strong>in</strong> total 25<br />
species).<br />
3)<br />
Only species known to be established were taken <strong>in</strong>to account.<br />
Cergopagis pengoi<br />
Source: <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> Alien Species Database (http://www.corpi.ku.lt/<br />
nemo; update: 10 April 2008)<br />
some of <strong>the</strong> most recent <strong>in</strong>vaders have shown a<br />
very rapid expansion. One of <strong>the</strong> best-documented<br />
<strong>in</strong>vasions is that of <strong>the</strong> benthic bristle worm Marenzelleria<br />
spp. that currently occurs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire <strong>Baltic</strong><br />
<strong>Sea</strong> and has become common <strong>in</strong> many soft-bottom<br />
habitats and is even a dom<strong>in</strong>ant species <strong>in</strong> some<br />
bottom communities; this has occurred <strong>in</strong> only <strong>the</strong><br />
roughly ten years s<strong>in</strong>ce its first appearance (Zettler<br />
1996, Cederwall et al. 1999, Perus & Bonsdorff<br />
2004, Figure 6.7.2). Recent genetic studies have also<br />
revealed that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vasion has been made by three<br />
different species (M. viridis, M. neglecta and M.<br />
arctia) that obviously are still expand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir range<br />
(Blank et al. 2008). O<strong>the</strong>r recent alien species with<br />
a rapid <strong>in</strong>vasion over large sea areas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>clude pelagic species such as <strong>the</strong> fishhook water<br />
flea Cercopagis pengoi and <strong>the</strong> American comb<br />
jelly Mnemiopsis leidyi. However, <strong>in</strong> 2009 scientists<br />
carried out genetic analyses of samples of M. leidyi<br />
and found out that specimen recently identified<br />
as M. leidyi were <strong>in</strong> fact Mertensia ovum, an arctic<br />
comb jelly (Maiju Leht<strong>in</strong>iemi, pers. comm.). American<br />
comb jelly M. leidyi, never<strong>the</strong>less, occurs at least<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> and elsewhere, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>vasion<br />
rate (Figure 6.7.1, Box 6.7.2) can be related<br />
to several factors: (i) <strong>in</strong>creased number and size<br />
of ships, (ii) <strong>in</strong>creased speed of ships, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
better survival of organisms dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> voyage,<br />
(iii) use of separate tanks <strong>in</strong>stead of cargo tanks<br />
for ballast water (less polluted ballast water), (iv)<br />
Box 6.7.2. How do we know which species is a human-mediated newcomer? *)<br />
120<br />
For most of <strong>the</strong> alien species recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re<br />
is evidence of <strong>the</strong>ir orig<strong>in</strong> achieved through studies of:<br />
• paleontological and archaeological records (absence of<br />
shells and o<strong>the</strong>r remnants),<br />
• historical data (absence <strong>in</strong> previous surveys and check lists,<br />
documented first collection or first release),<br />
• biogeographical patterns (discont<strong>in</strong>uous distribution, known<br />
as <strong>in</strong>troduced from o<strong>the</strong>r regions),<br />
• dispersal mechanisms (l<strong>in</strong>ks to human-mediated vectors,<br />
direct evidence of transport),<br />
• molecular genetic evidence, and<br />
• ecological evidence (short larval survival time, community<br />
association (e.g., foul<strong>in</strong>g on ship hulls), post-<strong>in</strong>troduction<br />
range expansion).<br />
However, it is often difficult to determ<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r a<br />
species is native or <strong>in</strong>troduced; such species with an<br />
unknown orig<strong>in</strong> are termed cryptogenic (Carlton 1996).<br />
*) Based on lectures given <strong>in</strong> 1997 by Prof. James T. Carlton<br />
(Williams College, Mystic, Connecticut, USA) at Åbo Akademi<br />
University.