BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NOx emissions and<br />
sewage<br />
Macrophytes<br />
Phytoplankton<br />
Waves along<br />
shipp<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
MARITIME TRAFFIC<br />
Species<br />
<strong>in</strong>troductions<br />
(e.g. ballast water)<br />
Zooplankton<br />
Benthic <strong>in</strong>vertebrates<br />
Oil spills and leakages<br />
Fish<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g disturbance<br />
Birds<br />
Porpoises<br />
<strong>Sea</strong>ls<br />
Figure 6.2.4. A conceptual model of <strong>the</strong> impacts of maritime traffic on components of <strong>Baltic</strong> biodiversity.<br />
Eutrophication result<strong>in</strong>g from NOx pollution is not covered as models exist elsewhere (see, e.g., HELCOM<br />
2009a).<br />
<strong>in</strong>g maritime transportation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
tanker traffic. However, <strong>the</strong> smaller spills which<br />
are frequently observed also have considerable<br />
negative effects. Although most of <strong>the</strong> shipp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> follows narrow routes through <strong>the</strong><br />
sea area, nearly every corner <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> is to<br />
some extent used by shipp<strong>in</strong>g, as shown by <strong>the</strong><br />
recent AIS (Automatic Identification System) data<br />
(Figure 6.2.1). To meet <strong>the</strong> challenges posed by <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g maritime traffic, a comprehensive crosssectoral<br />
approach should be established, implement<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of Mar<strong>in</strong>e Spatial Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>Baltic</strong>-wide risk assessment (Formal<br />
Safety Assessment) of maritime traffic.<br />
tract<strong>in</strong>g Parties dur<strong>in</strong>g recent years. The mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />
areas considered suitable for m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g resources<br />
from <strong>the</strong> seabed have until recently been<br />
restricted to areas less than 80 m deep, but currently<br />
depths down to 100 m can be exploited<br />
cost-effectively ow<strong>in</strong>g to more efficient and powerful<br />
dredgers (UNEP GPA 2008).<br />
In 2006, <strong>the</strong> volume extracted <strong>in</strong> Denmark<br />
(HELCOM area) was 1.6 million m 3 , <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land<br />
2.2 million m 3 , and <strong>in</strong> Germany (HELCOM area)<br />
1.4 million m 3 . In Estonia, <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>in</strong> 2004 was<br />
1.4 million m 3 and <strong>in</strong> Poland it was 0.5 million m 3<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2002 (ICES 2003, 2005c, 2007a).<br />
6.3 Physical damage and<br />
disturbance<br />
Human activities discussed <strong>in</strong> this section can be<br />
classified <strong>in</strong>to three major types: extraction of<br />
sand and gravel, dump<strong>in</strong>g of dredged spoils, and<br />
effects of various types of construction works. The<br />
harmful effects of <strong>the</strong>se activities are caused by<br />
largely similar processes: resuspension of nutrients<br />
and hazardous substances, <strong>in</strong>creased turbidity,<br />
siltation and habitat loss. The operation of different<br />
<strong>in</strong>stallations is l<strong>in</strong>ked to diverse effects <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
disturbance from underwater noise, magnetic<br />
fields and also by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction of new habitats.<br />
After <strong>the</strong> construction of <strong>the</strong> Öresund bridge<br />
between Sweden and Denmark, <strong>the</strong>re has been no<br />
permitted mar<strong>in</strong>e sand extraction <strong>in</strong> Sweden. The<br />
amount extracted <strong>in</strong> that project <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Swedish<br />
EEZ was 2.5 million m 3 . When <strong>the</strong> fairway to <strong>the</strong><br />
Go<strong>the</strong>nburg harbour was deepened <strong>in</strong> 2003,<br />
12 million m 3 was dredged (ICES 2006a). In<br />
general, port constructions and enlargements are<br />
among <strong>the</strong> largest dredg<strong>in</strong>g and landfill projects.<br />
For example, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> enlargement of <strong>the</strong> Århus<br />
port <strong>in</strong> Denmark, 8 million m 3 of sand was dredged<br />
from Århus Bight and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> new port of Hels<strong>in</strong>ki,<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land, <strong>the</strong> volume was 4 million m 3 . An overview<br />
of <strong>Baltic</strong> ports shows that <strong>the</strong>re are enlargement<br />
plans for most of <strong>the</strong>m (BPO 2007).<br />
102<br />
6.3.1 Extraction and disposal activities<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong><br />
Extraction of bottom substrates<br />
Extraction of sand and gravel from <strong>the</strong> seafloor<br />
has <strong>in</strong>creased markedly <strong>in</strong> many HELCOM Con-<br />
Disposal of dredged material at sea<br />
It is difficult to obta<strong>in</strong> an overview of <strong>the</strong> current<br />
volume of disposal of dredged material at sea <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> HELCOM area. HELCOM Contract<strong>in</strong>g Parties<br />
have an obligation, based on Article 11 and Annex<br />
V of <strong>the</strong> Hels<strong>in</strong>ki Convention and <strong>the</strong> associated