BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 6.1.1. Catch range dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> past five years and <strong>the</strong> current state of selected major <strong>Baltic</strong> commercial<br />
fish stocks (ICES 2008b,d). SSB: Spawn<strong>in</strong>g stock biomass; F: Fish<strong>in</strong>g mortality.<br />
Stock<br />
Catch range <strong>in</strong> past<br />
5 years (2003–2007,<br />
10 3 tonnes)<br />
SSB <strong>in</strong> relation<br />
to precautionary<br />
limits<br />
F <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />
precautionary limits<br />
F <strong>in</strong> relation to high<br />
long-term yield<br />
Western cod 20–24 Increased risk Undef<strong>in</strong>ed Overfished<br />
Eastern cod 50–71 Undef<strong>in</strong>ed Harvested susta<strong>in</strong>ably Overfished<br />
Herr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> SD<br />
91–116 Undef<strong>in</strong>ed Harvested susta<strong>in</strong>ably Underfished<br />
25–29 (excl.<br />
GoR) and 32<br />
Gulf of Riga<br />
31–40 Undef<strong>in</strong>ed Harvested susta<strong>in</strong>ably Overfished<br />
herr<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Sprat 308–405 Unknown Increased risk Overfished<br />
Flounder 15–19 Unknown Unknown Unknown<br />
94<br />
to about 100 000 tonnes recently. In contrast,<br />
<strong>the</strong> stock of Gulf of Riga herr<strong>in</strong>g has more than<br />
doubled dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> past two decades. Flounder<br />
catches have <strong>in</strong>creased s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> early 1990s and<br />
are currently over 15 000 tonnes annually. The<br />
dynamics <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> land<strong>in</strong>gs of eleven mar<strong>in</strong>e fish<br />
species over time are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 6.1.2 (ICES<br />
2008b). Land<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> major <strong>Baltic</strong> fish stocks are<br />
shown <strong>in</strong> Table 6.1.1.<br />
6.1.2 Ecosystem effects of fish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
activities<br />
The major impact of fish<strong>in</strong>g is undoubtedly on<br />
exploited fish stocks, but <strong>the</strong>re are also impacts on<br />
benthic <strong>in</strong>vertebrate and fish communities, mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />
mammals, seabirds and <strong>the</strong> abiotic environment.<br />
The effect of fish<strong>in</strong>g on various ecosystem components<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r than fish is different <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> open sea<br />
from that <strong>in</strong> coastal areas ma<strong>in</strong>ly ow<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> different<br />
fish<strong>in</strong>g gears employed, which depends on<br />
<strong>the</strong> species composition of exploitable resources<br />
and <strong>the</strong> different habitat characteristics.<br />
Fish stocks<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> ecological impact of fisheries is <strong>the</strong><br />
removal of large quantities of fish, <strong>in</strong> particular<br />
target species. The major effects <strong>in</strong>clude, amongst<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs, a decrease <strong>in</strong> fish abundance and/or<br />
spawn<strong>in</strong>g stock biomass, a decrease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> size of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual fish at sea, and changed predator-prey<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions. A dramatic reduction <strong>in</strong> a piscivorous<br />
mar<strong>in</strong>e fish population may <strong>in</strong>itiate a multi-level<br />
trophic cascade and <strong>in</strong>directly also affect zooplankton<br />
and phytoplankton populations (Cas<strong>in</strong>i et al.<br />
2008). Although <strong>the</strong> effect of fisheries on nontarget<br />
species is of great importance from an eco-<br />
system perspective, <strong>the</strong>re is only very little known<br />
on this topic. Effects of fish<strong>in</strong>g on fish stocks and<br />
fish communities are also discussed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 3 of<br />
this report.<br />
An important impact on <strong>the</strong> ecosystem is also<br />
caused by by-catches and discards. Except <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
cod fishery, <strong>the</strong> extent of fish by-catch is unknown<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>. Discard estimates for <strong>the</strong> two<br />
<strong>Baltic</strong> cod stocks are available s<strong>in</strong>ce 1996 when<br />
sampl<strong>in</strong>g began. The western and eastern cod<br />
discards have fluctuated dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> period of<br />
data availability (i.e., 1996–2007) from 5.0–26.6<br />
million and 3.7–23.3 million <strong>in</strong>dividuals, respectively.<br />
However, <strong>the</strong> discard estimates are relatively<br />
uncerta<strong>in</strong> (ICES 2008b). Calculations show that <strong>the</strong><br />
amount of cod offal discarded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire <strong>Baltic</strong><br />
<strong>Sea</strong> (i.e., sub-divisions 22–32) reached a peak <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> early 1980s (average ca. 58 000 tonnes annually)<br />
and was relatively low <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s, with an<br />
annual mean of about 19 000 tonnes (ICES 1997).<br />
Demersal communities<br />
In general, bottom trawls have an impact on<br />
mar<strong>in</strong>e biota <strong>in</strong> several ways <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g (i) a reduction<br />
<strong>in</strong> structural biota; (ii) a reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> geographic<br />
range of species; (iii) a decrease <strong>in</strong> populations<br />
that have low rates of turnover; (iv) fragmentation<br />
of populations; (v) alteration of <strong>the</strong> relative<br />
abundance of species; (vi) sub-lethal effects on<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals; (vii) an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> populations that<br />
have high rates of turnover; and (viii) favour<strong>in</strong>g<br />
populations of scaveng<strong>in</strong>g species (ICES 2000).<br />
There are only a few studies available <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Baltic</strong> region on bottom trawl<strong>in</strong>g impacts on <strong>the</strong><br />
mar<strong>in</strong>e ecosystem. It has been documented that