04.03.2014 Views

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 6.1.1. Catch range dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> past five years and <strong>the</strong> current state of selected major <strong>Baltic</strong> commercial<br />

fish stocks (ICES 2008b,d). SSB: Spawn<strong>in</strong>g stock biomass; F: Fish<strong>in</strong>g mortality.<br />

Stock<br />

Catch range <strong>in</strong> past<br />

5 years (2003–2007,<br />

10 3 tonnes)<br />

SSB <strong>in</strong> relation<br />

to precautionary<br />

limits<br />

F <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

precautionary limits<br />

F <strong>in</strong> relation to high<br />

long-term yield<br />

Western cod 20–24 Increased risk Undef<strong>in</strong>ed Overfished<br />

Eastern cod 50–71 Undef<strong>in</strong>ed Harvested susta<strong>in</strong>ably Overfished<br />

Herr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> SD<br />

91–116 Undef<strong>in</strong>ed Harvested susta<strong>in</strong>ably Underfished<br />

25–29 (excl.<br />

GoR) and 32<br />

Gulf of Riga<br />

31–40 Undef<strong>in</strong>ed Harvested susta<strong>in</strong>ably Overfished<br />

herr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Sprat 308–405 Unknown Increased risk Overfished<br />

Flounder 15–19 Unknown Unknown Unknown<br />

94<br />

to about 100 000 tonnes recently. In contrast,<br />

<strong>the</strong> stock of Gulf of Riga herr<strong>in</strong>g has more than<br />

doubled dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> past two decades. Flounder<br />

catches have <strong>in</strong>creased s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> early 1990s and<br />

are currently over 15 000 tonnes annually. The<br />

dynamics <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> land<strong>in</strong>gs of eleven mar<strong>in</strong>e fish<br />

species over time are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 6.1.2 (ICES<br />

2008b). Land<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> major <strong>Baltic</strong> fish stocks are<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> Table 6.1.1.<br />

6.1.2 Ecosystem effects of fish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

activities<br />

The major impact of fish<strong>in</strong>g is undoubtedly on<br />

exploited fish stocks, but <strong>the</strong>re are also impacts on<br />

benthic <strong>in</strong>vertebrate and fish communities, mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />

mammals, seabirds and <strong>the</strong> abiotic environment.<br />

The effect of fish<strong>in</strong>g on various ecosystem components<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r than fish is different <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> open sea<br />

from that <strong>in</strong> coastal areas ma<strong>in</strong>ly ow<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> different<br />

fish<strong>in</strong>g gears employed, which depends on<br />

<strong>the</strong> species composition of exploitable resources<br />

and <strong>the</strong> different habitat characteristics.<br />

Fish stocks<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> ecological impact of fisheries is <strong>the</strong><br />

removal of large quantities of fish, <strong>in</strong> particular<br />

target species. The major effects <strong>in</strong>clude, amongst<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs, a decrease <strong>in</strong> fish abundance and/or<br />

spawn<strong>in</strong>g stock biomass, a decrease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> size of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual fish at sea, and changed predator-prey<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions. A dramatic reduction <strong>in</strong> a piscivorous<br />

mar<strong>in</strong>e fish population may <strong>in</strong>itiate a multi-level<br />

trophic cascade and <strong>in</strong>directly also affect zooplankton<br />

and phytoplankton populations (Cas<strong>in</strong>i et al.<br />

2008). Although <strong>the</strong> effect of fisheries on nontarget<br />

species is of great importance from an eco-<br />

system perspective, <strong>the</strong>re is only very little known<br />

on this topic. Effects of fish<strong>in</strong>g on fish stocks and<br />

fish communities are also discussed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 3 of<br />

this report.<br />

An important impact on <strong>the</strong> ecosystem is also<br />

caused by by-catches and discards. Except <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

cod fishery, <strong>the</strong> extent of fish by-catch is unknown<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>. Discard estimates for <strong>the</strong> two<br />

<strong>Baltic</strong> cod stocks are available s<strong>in</strong>ce 1996 when<br />

sampl<strong>in</strong>g began. The western and eastern cod<br />

discards have fluctuated dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> period of<br />

data availability (i.e., 1996–2007) from 5.0–26.6<br />

million and 3.7–23.3 million <strong>in</strong>dividuals, respectively.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> discard estimates are relatively<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong> (ICES 2008b). Calculations show that <strong>the</strong><br />

amount of cod offal discarded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire <strong>Baltic</strong><br />

<strong>Sea</strong> (i.e., sub-divisions 22–32) reached a peak <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> early 1980s (average ca. 58 000 tonnes annually)<br />

and was relatively low <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s, with an<br />

annual mean of about 19 000 tonnes (ICES 1997).<br />

Demersal communities<br />

In general, bottom trawls have an impact on<br />

mar<strong>in</strong>e biota <strong>in</strong> several ways <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g (i) a reduction<br />

<strong>in</strong> structural biota; (ii) a reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> geographic<br />

range of species; (iii) a decrease <strong>in</strong> populations<br />

that have low rates of turnover; (iv) fragmentation<br />

of populations; (v) alteration of <strong>the</strong> relative<br />

abundance of species; (vi) sub-lethal effects on<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals; (vii) an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> populations that<br />

have high rates of turnover; and (viii) favour<strong>in</strong>g<br />

populations of scaveng<strong>in</strong>g species (ICES 2000).<br />

There are only a few studies available <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Baltic</strong> region on bottom trawl<strong>in</strong>g impacts on <strong>the</strong><br />

mar<strong>in</strong>e ecosystem. It has been documented that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!