BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Box 1.2. Regime shifts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> as detected by an Integrated Ecosystem Assessment<br />
The ICES/HELCOM Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Integrated Assessments<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> (WGIAB) has conducted Integrated Ecosystem<br />
Assessments (IEAs) on a number of offshore and one coastal<br />
sub-region of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> (see table) (ICES 2008a). IEAs are<br />
multivariate analyses of time series of <strong>the</strong> physical, chemical<br />
and biological environment as well as socio-economic factors.<br />
The analyses were targeted to assess <strong>the</strong> impact of climate,<br />
fisheries, and eutrophication on <strong>the</strong> different sub-regions.<br />
All seven sub-regions <strong>in</strong>vestigated displayed pronounced<br />
structural changes, i.e., regime shifts, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> past two<br />
to three decades. The major period of restructur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Baltic</strong> sub-regions was at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> 1980s. The Sound,<br />
central <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>, Gulf of Riga, Gulf of F<strong>in</strong>land, and Bothnian<br />
Bay also underwent structural change dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s,<br />
probably related to <strong>the</strong> major <strong>in</strong>flow <strong>in</strong> 1993.<br />
For <strong>the</strong> central <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>, two relatively stable periods were<br />
detected <strong>in</strong> 1974–1987 and 1994–2006. The first period<br />
was characterized by comparatively high cod and<br />
herr<strong>in</strong>g spawner biomass and recruitment, and high<br />
abundances of <strong>the</strong> copepod Pseudocalanus acuspes,<br />
whereas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> later period <strong>the</strong> system was spratdom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
with high abundances of Acartia spp. and<br />
Temora longicornis. Between <strong>the</strong> two shifts, <strong>the</strong>re was<br />
a transition period of highly variable climatic and hydrographic<br />
conditions and no major <strong>in</strong>flow events, result<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> low sal<strong>in</strong>ity and high temperature values.<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> drivers of <strong>the</strong> observed ecosystem changes<br />
vary between sub-regions, but <strong>the</strong>y all <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g temperature and decreas<strong>in</strong>g sal<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong>fluenced<br />
by large-scale atmospheric processes. In addition<br />
to temperature and sal<strong>in</strong>ity, fish<strong>in</strong>g pressure was<br />
identified as an important driver for <strong>the</strong> central <strong>Baltic</strong><br />
<strong>Sea</strong> and Bothnian <strong>Sea</strong> as well as nutrients for <strong>the</strong><br />
highly eutrophied Gulf of F<strong>in</strong>land.<br />
Regime shifts (RS 1 to RS 4) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> different sub-bas<strong>in</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>in</strong> several time periods.<br />
System Period covered RS 1 RS 2 RS 3 RS 4<br />
The Sound 1979–2005 1987/88 1995/96<br />
Central <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> 1974–2006 1987/88 1994/95<br />
Gulf of Riga 1974–2006 1988/89 1997/98<br />
Gulf of F<strong>in</strong>land 1979–2007 1988/89 1995/96 2002/03<br />
Bothnian <strong>Sea</strong> 1979–2006 1982/83 1988/89<br />
Bothnian Bay 1979–2006 1987/88 1993/94<br />
Kvädöfjärden, Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Baltic</strong> Proper 1971–2006 1976/77 1987/88 2004/05<br />
16<br />
There is ample evidence for a positive relationship<br />
between <strong>the</strong> number of species and ecosystem<br />
productivity and stability over time as well as for<br />
<strong>the</strong> capacity of an ecosystem to recover after<br />
disturbances (Naeem & Li 1997, Worm et al.<br />
2006). Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> environment that result <strong>in</strong><br />
decreased biodiversity are <strong>the</strong>refore considered<br />
to make systems less resilient and more prone to<br />
undergo regime shifts. In an ecosystem such as<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> that is characterized by low species,<br />
genetic, and functional diversity, protection of<br />
biodiversity is thus central to ensur<strong>in</strong>g ecosystem<br />
resilience.<br />
1.5 Protection of<br />
biodiversity—Global and<br />
European targets<br />
Protection of biodiversity is an <strong>in</strong>tegral part of<br />
<strong>the</strong> ecosystem approach to <strong>the</strong> management<br />
of human activities. The 1992 United Nations<br />
Convention on Biological Diversity has provided<br />
<strong>the</strong> basis and concepts for much of <strong>the</strong> work on<br />
biodiversity protection. At <strong>the</strong> UN World Summit<br />
on Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development <strong>in</strong> 2002, <strong>the</strong> governments<br />
committed <strong>the</strong>mselves to significantly<br />
reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> rate of biodiversity loss by 2010.<br />
Halt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> loss of biodiversity by 2010 is also a