04.03.2014 Views

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Number of <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

12000<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

Ground<br />

Air<br />

Expon. (Ground)<br />

y = 3E-64e 0,0773x<br />

0<br />

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008<br />

Figure 4.2.2. Numbers of grey seals counted from ground level along<br />

<strong>the</strong> Swedish coast. The annual rate of <strong>in</strong>crease was 8% up to 2005.<br />

Surveys from air, started <strong>in</strong> 2006, give higher po<strong>in</strong>t estimates. Equation<br />

given for exponential (Expon.) curve fit.<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1750s. Harbour seals reproduce <strong>in</strong> June, mate<br />

<strong>in</strong> July, and moult <strong>in</strong> July–August.<br />

Harbour seals <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kalmarsund region were close<br />

to ext<strong>in</strong>ction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1970s. Hunt<strong>in</strong>g, possibly <strong>in</strong><br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation with effects of contam<strong>in</strong>ants, resulted<br />

<strong>in</strong> a severe population bottle-neck and only some<br />

tens of pups were observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1970s (Härkönen et al. 2005). After protective<br />

measures were taken and seal sanctuaries were<br />

established <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980s and 1990s, <strong>the</strong> population<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased by 7% per year up to 2007, when<br />

630 seals were counted dur<strong>in</strong>g moult. The pup<br />

production also showed a similar positive trend<br />

and close to 100 pups were born <strong>in</strong> 2007. Because<br />

harbour seals <strong>in</strong> this area spend about 65% of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

time on land, <strong>the</strong> true population size is close to<br />

1 000 seals. There is virtually no <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong><br />

health status of this population.<br />

68<br />

ible data is for <strong>the</strong> Swedish coastal waters. The<br />

mean annual rate of <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 1990–<br />

2005 was about 8% (Figure 4.2.2), which is somewhat<br />

less than <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical maximum growth<br />

rate of 10% for <strong>the</strong> species (Hard<strong>in</strong>g et al. 2007).<br />

Surveys from air carried out <strong>in</strong> 2006 and 2007<br />

<strong>in</strong> Sweden give higher estimates of abundance,<br />

but it will take at least six years until such data<br />

can provide useful <strong>in</strong>formation for trend analyses<br />

(Hard<strong>in</strong>g et al. 2007).<br />

The recovery of grey seals south of 59º N, where<br />

<strong>the</strong>y had been regularly present before <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were hunted to ext<strong>in</strong>ction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

<strong>the</strong> 20th century, is very slow (Herrmann et al.<br />

2007). Although grey seals are observed more<br />

often than 10 years ago, no resident colonies have<br />

been reported on <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Baltic</strong> coast (from<br />

Germany to Latvia).<br />

Harbour seals (Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a)<br />

Harbour seals occur only <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> and <strong>the</strong>re are no historical records<br />

of harbour seals north of a l<strong>in</strong>e from Västervik<br />

(Sweden) to Hiiumaa <strong>in</strong> Estonia. The harbour seals<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kalmarsund region are genetically dist<strong>in</strong>ct<br />

from adjacent populations, with gene sequences<br />

present <strong>in</strong> only this population. The current<br />

harbour seal population <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> southwestern <strong>Baltic</strong><br />

(Scania and Denmark) seems to have colonized <strong>the</strong><br />

area after <strong>the</strong> grey seals were severely depleted <strong>in</strong><br />

Harbour seals <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Baltic</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Kattegat,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Skagerrak also decl<strong>in</strong>ed steeply <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> 20th century as a consequence<br />

of <strong>the</strong> coord<strong>in</strong>ated Nordic exterm<strong>in</strong>ation effort.<br />

Bounty statistics suggest that more than 17 000<br />

harbour seals were present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area <strong>in</strong> 1890,<br />

but only about 2 000 seals rema<strong>in</strong>ed at <strong>the</strong> end<br />

of <strong>the</strong> 1930s (Heide-Jørgensen & Härkönen<br />

1988). Heavy hunt<strong>in</strong>g pressure kept <strong>the</strong> population<br />

at this level until <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> 1970s,<br />

when hunt<strong>in</strong>g was prohibited and seal conservation<br />

areas were established. Annual surveys of<br />

<strong>the</strong> population started <strong>in</strong> 1979 and <strong>the</strong> population<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased at 12% per year until 1988 when<br />

it was hit by a phoc<strong>in</strong>e distemper virus (PDV)<br />

epidemic that killed about half <strong>the</strong> population.<br />

Subsequently, <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong>creased exponentially<br />

at 13% per year until a new PDV epidemic <strong>in</strong><br />

2002 killed 66% of <strong>the</strong> seals <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Skagerrak and<br />

30% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kattegat (Härkönen et al. 2006). A<br />

third epidemic caused by an unknown pathogen<br />

appeared <strong>in</strong> 2007 and killed some thousands of<br />

seals, but <strong>the</strong> total impact cannot be evaluated<br />

until survey results from 2008 become available.<br />

The total ‘true’ population size was about 10 100<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2007, but this number should be regarded as<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong> because seals may have died <strong>in</strong> great<br />

numbers after <strong>the</strong> surveys <strong>in</strong> 2007 were conducted.<br />

The reproductive status of this population<br />

appears to be normal because 95% of mature

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!