BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
BSEP116B Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea - Helcom
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(2003–2007), <strong>the</strong> number of breed<strong>in</strong>g pairs was<br />
between 50 and 60. The total <strong>Baltic</strong> population<br />
was estimated at about 1 110–1 360 bp <strong>in</strong> 2002<br />
(Thorup 2006), and not more than 700–800 bp <strong>in</strong><br />
2007 (Table 4.3.2).<br />
<strong>the</strong> dunl<strong>in</strong> population. It is very likely that <strong>the</strong> rapid<br />
decl<strong>in</strong>e of <strong>the</strong> dunl<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> area is not a<br />
consequence of habitat loss, but ra<strong>the</strong>r is driven by<br />
large-scale factors such as climate change.<br />
Habitat loss by dra<strong>in</strong>age and land reclamation<br />
have been considered as reasons for <strong>the</strong> population<br />
decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past (Holz 1986). An <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
predators and management problems for coastal<br />
meadows seem to be o<strong>the</strong>r important fac tors<br />
affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> population. However, <strong>the</strong> dramatic<br />
long-term decl<strong>in</strong>e from probably far more than<br />
100 000 bp at <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> 20th century<br />
to less than 1 000 one hundred years later cannot<br />
be expla<strong>in</strong>ed only by habitat loss and predation.<br />
Even <strong>in</strong> areas where suitable habitats have been<br />
conserved and properly managed, <strong>the</strong> dunl<strong>in</strong> is<br />
decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g or has even disappeared. In Germany,<br />
Denmark, Sweden and Lithuania, restoration<br />
projects for breed<strong>in</strong>g habitats of dunl<strong>in</strong>, ruff<br />
(Philomachus pugnax) and o<strong>the</strong>r waders have<br />
recently been implemented or are currently under<br />
implementation. Specific programmes and projects<br />
aim<strong>in</strong>g to restore breed<strong>in</strong>g habitats are also be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
implemented <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land and Poland. However,<br />
<strong>the</strong>se efforts do not yet show positive effects for<br />
Sandwich tern (Sterna sandvicensis)<br />
At <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> 20th century, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong><br />
<strong>Sea</strong> was not part of <strong>the</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g range of <strong>the</strong><br />
sandwich tern. However, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong><br />
century, <strong>the</strong> species expanded its range gradually<br />
to <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast, coloniz<strong>in</strong>g Skåne <strong>in</strong> 1911 and <strong>the</strong><br />
Swedish east coast dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1930s. Start<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
<strong>the</strong> formation of a colony on <strong>the</strong> island Heuwiese<br />
(Germany, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania) <strong>in</strong><br />
1957, <strong>the</strong> sandwich tern cont<strong>in</strong>ued its range expansion<br />
to <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn coasts of <strong>the</strong> western and<br />
central <strong>Baltic</strong>, becom<strong>in</strong>g a permanent breed<strong>in</strong>g bird<br />
first at <strong>the</strong> German <strong>Baltic</strong> coast and shortly after, <strong>in</strong><br />
1962, <strong>in</strong> Estonia. It bred <strong>in</strong> Poland from 1977–1991<br />
and aga<strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce 2006.<br />
The range expansion and positive population<br />
development <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> area dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
1950s/1960s occurred at a time when <strong>the</strong> North<br />
<strong>Sea</strong> population decl<strong>in</strong>ed dramatically. This <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />
that <strong>the</strong> colonization of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> could have<br />
Table 4.3.2. The dunl<strong>in</strong> population <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> littoral countries.<br />
Country<br />
Current breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Remarks<br />
Source of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
population<br />
Denmark 350 2002 Thorup (2003)<br />
Sweden 85–120 2006 M. Larsson, pers. com.<br />
Estonia 200–250 2007 Elts et al. (2008)<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 50–60 2003–2007 F<strong>in</strong>nish work<strong>in</strong>g group on<br />
Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Dunl<strong>in</strong>, M<strong>in</strong>istry<br />
of Environment F<strong>in</strong>land<br />
Germany, Mecklenburg-<br />
Western Pomerania<br />
Germany,<br />
Schleswig-Holste<strong>in</strong><br />
9 2007 Work<strong>in</strong>g Group for Coastal<br />
Bird Protection Meckl.- W.<br />
Pomerania<br />
0 at <strong>the</strong> west coast (North <strong>Sea</strong>) W. Knief, pers. comm.<br />
probably still 0–5 bp<br />
Latvia 1–5 1989–1997 Thorup (2006)<br />
Lithuania 25–30 1996–1998 Thorup (2006)<br />
Poland 0–5 no breed<strong>in</strong>g record <strong>in</strong> 2007,<br />
but observation of some<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g season<br />
Sikora et al. (2008)<br />
Russia,<br />
St. Petersburg Region<br />
Russia, Kal<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>grad<br />
Region<br />
Total, <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> littoral<br />
countries<br />
1–5 sporadic breeder at <strong>the</strong> Gulf<br />
of F<strong>in</strong>land, one nest found<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2008<br />
2 2001, no breed<strong>in</strong>g record<br />
after 2001<br />
700–800<br />
V. Fedorov, pers. comm.<br />
Grishanov & Lykov (2008)<br />
79