06.03.2014 Views

NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS

NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS

NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2006 <strong>IRIS</strong> 5-YEAR PROPOSAL SURFACE OF THE EARTH: GLOBAL STUDIES<br />

Advances in Active-Source Seismic Imaging Using Traveltime<br />

and Waveform Tomography<br />

Colin A. Zelt • Rice University<br />

John A. Hole • Virginia Polytechnic Institute<br />

R. Gerhard Pratt • Queen’s University, Canada<br />

In 2003, as part of a workshop funded by IASPEI, NSF, <strong>IRIS</strong> and Virginia Tech, a realistic active-source synthetic dataset<br />

was made available to the community for the purpose of testing inversion and imaging algorithms by workers who, at the<br />

time, did not know what the true model was. The synthetic wide-angle dataset, consisting of 51 shots and 2779 receivers, was<br />

calc<br />

hole/ccss/. The survey design is consistent with experiments that could be supported by the <strong>IRIS</strong>-PASSCAL Instrument<br />

Center in about three years. The true model contains large-scale features such as a low-velocity zone and regions where the<br />

crust-mantle boundary is sharp and smooth, as well as intermediate to wavelength-scale stochastic features. Both first arrival<br />

and simultaneous PmP/Pn traveltime tomography were applied to obtain smooth velocity models that compare favorably with<br />

the large-scale features of the true model. The model obtained from first-arrival traveltime tomography was used as a starting<br />

model for 2-D acoustic, frequency-domain waveform tomography. The final model from waveform tomography matches the<br />

large and intermediate-scale (down to ~1 km) features of the true model, including the low-velocity zone and the structure of<br />

the crust-mantle transition zone. The combined results from traveltime and waveform tomography show the complementary<br />

nature of these approaches and the potential for the analysis of real active-source crustal data in the future.<br />

True velocity model and inversion results. A) True model. B) Model derived from traveltime tomography using first arrivals. C) Model derived<br />

from traveltime inversion using first arrivals and wide-angle reflections from the Moho. D) Model derived from waveform tomography using<br />

(B) as the starting model.<br />

Hole, J.A., C. A. Zelt and R. G. Pratt, Advances in Controlled-Source Seismic Imaging, EOS, 86, No. 18, p. 177, 181, 2005.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!