06.03.2014 Views

NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS

NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS

NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SURFACE OF THE EARTH: NORTH AMERICA<br />

2006 <strong>IRIS</strong> 5-YEAR PROPOSAL<br />

Lithospheric Structure of the Rio Grande Rift<br />

The RISTRA Group<br />

The seismic structure of the crust and upper mantle of the southwestern United States has been examined using teleseismic<br />

arrivals recorded by <strong>IRIS</strong> PASSCAL Instruments in LA RISTRA (Colorado PLAteau Rio Grande Rift-Great Plains Seismic<br />

TRAnsect). Receiver function estimation and filtering methods developed by Wilson and Aster (2005) produce receiver<br />

functions with decreased sensitivity to noise. Crustal thickness and V P /V S are estimated using both direct and reverberated<br />

P-to-S receiver function modes. Regularized receiver function migration methods produce a multiple- suppressed image of<br />

the velocity discontinuity structure of the subsurface. Crustal thickness averages 44.1 +/- 2.3 km beneath the Great Plains<br />

(GP) and 45.6 +/- 1.1 km beneath the Colorado plateau (CP). Crustal thinning beneath the RGR is broadly symmetric about<br />

the <br />

beneath the RGR (figure 2). We observe a prominent northwest-dipping discontinuity, ranging from 65-85 km deep beneath<br />

the CP, and possible subcrustal discontinuities beneath the GP. These discontinuities, along with recent xenolith data, are<br />

consistent with preserved ancient lithospheric structures such as<br />

relict suture zones associated with Proterozoic subduction. An<br />

upper mantle discontinuity at 220-300 km depth may correlate<br />

with similar structure observed beneath eastern North America.<br />

Flat discontinuities at 410 and 660 km depth suggest that there<br />

is not a large-scale thermal anomaly beneath the RGR at these<br />

depths (Wilson et al., 2005b). Research supported by the NSF<br />

Geophysics program and Los Alamos IGPP; instruments and field<br />

support provided by <strong>IRIS</strong> PASSCAL.<br />

Figure 2. Moho modeling for specific lower-crust:upper-crust extension ratios,<br />

with the best fit being LC:UC=2.0:1. Note extensive widening of the rift structure<br />

at depth. Background colors depict S-wave variations from joint body/surface<br />

wave inversion (3.6-4.7 km/s; West et al., 2004). Both after Wilson et al. (2005a).<br />

Figure 1. The 960-km RISTRA transect<br />

across the Rio Grande rift (RGR) region.<br />

Areas of Cenozoic extension are hatched.<br />

West, M., J. Ni, W.S. Baldridge, D. Wilson, R. Aster, W. Gao, and S. Grand, crust and upper mantle shear wave structure of the southwest of the southwest<br />

United States: Implications for rifting and support for high elevation. J. Geophys. Res. 109, doi: 101029/2003JB002575, 2004.<br />

Wilson, D., Aster, R.,lter -<br />

ing, and multimode Kirchhoff migration, J. Geophys. Res., in press, 2005.<br />

Wilson, D., Aster, R., West, M., Ni, J., Grand, S., Gao, W., Baldridge, W.S., Semken, S.,Lithospheric Structure of the Rio Grande Rift, Nature, 433, doi:<br />

10.1038/nature03297, 2005a.<br />

Wilson, D., Aster, R., Ni, J., Grand, S., West, M., Gao, W., Baldridge, W.S., Semken, S., Imaging the seismic structure of the crust and upper mantle beneath<br />

the Great Plains, Rio Grande Rift, and Colorado Plateau, J. Geophys. Res., in press, 2005b.<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!