06.03.2014 Views

NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS

NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS

NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MONITORING OTHER SEISMIC SOURCES<br />

2006 <strong>IRIS</strong> 5-YEAR PROPOSAL<br />

Mid-Ocean-Bottom and Land-based Microseism Correlations<br />

Peter D. Bromirski • Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD<br />

Fred K. Duennebier • University of Hawaii, Honolulu<br />

Ralph A. Stephen • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />

Inversion of the double-frequency (DF) microseism band for ocean wave heights from archived seismic data can provide an<br />

important diagnostic of climate change (Bromirski et al., 1999; Bromirski et al., 2005a). The usefulness of such inversions requires<br />

knowledge of the source areas and propagation attributes of microseisms. The Hawaii-2 Observatory (H2O) is an excellent site for<br />

studying microseism characteristics since it is located far from shorelines and shallow water. The DF microseism band can be divided<br />

into short period and long period bands, SPDF and LPDF, respectively. A strong correlation of seismic amplitude with wind speed<br />

and direction is observed at H2O in the SPDF band from about 0.20 to 0.45 Hz (Bromirski et al., 2005b), implying that the energy<br />

reaching the ocean floor is generated locally by ocean gravity waves. Near-shore land seismic stations see similar SPDF spectra, also<br />

generated locally by wind seas. Correlation of swell height above<br />

H2O with the LPDF band from 0.085 to 0.20 Hz is often poor,<br />

implying that a significant portion of this energy originates at distant<br />

locations. The LPDF microseism signals recorded at the H2O<br />

correlate with signals at other seismic stations around the North<br />

Pacific, clearly shown by comparing difference spectrograms<br />

(Figure 1). Comparison of relative amplitudes gives an indication<br />

of the source region, e.g. higher relative amplitudes at COLA<br />

and LLLB compared with JCC, H2O, and KIP implies a Pacific<br />

Northwest coastal source region. The times of low relative microseism<br />

energy correlate across the stations, indicating that there is<br />

little energy being coupled into LPDF microseisms anywhere in<br />

the North Pacific during these times. Most of the LPDF energy<br />

at H2O appears to be generated by high amplitude storm waves<br />

impacting long stretches of coastline nearly simultaneously, and<br />

the Hawaiian Islands appear to be a significant source of LPDF<br />

energy in the North Pacific when waves arrive from particular<br />

directions. The highest DF levels observed at mid-ocean site<br />

H2O occur in the SPDF band when two coincident nearby storm<br />

systems develop. This extreme event at H2O is not observed at<br />

continental sites, indicating high attenuation of these signals. At<br />

near-coastal seismic land stations, both SPDF and LPDF microseism<br />

levels are generally dominated by local generation at nearby<br />

shorelines (Bromirski and Duennebier, 2002). High relative SPDF<br />

levels are generally not observed concurrently at JCC and H2O<br />

(Figure 1), indicating that DF microseisms generated near H2O<br />

do not propagate well, consistent with low effective Q, and also<br />

indicating that open-ocean generated DF microseisms will not<br />

significantly affect the statistics of ocean wave parameters determined<br />

from inversion of land microseismic spectra.<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

D 10 20 30J 10 20 30F<br />

December 2001 − January 2002<br />

−10 −5 0 5 10 15<br />

Spectral Difference (dB)<br />

Difference spectrograms of vertical component data from<br />

eastern North Pacific seismic stations located in Hawaii (KIP),<br />

central Alaska (COLA), southwestern Canada (LLLB), northwestern<br />

California (JCC, NCEDC), and mid-ocean H2O during<br />

December 2001 and January, 2002, showing the similarity<br />

of energy in the LPDF microseism band. Dark vertical strips<br />

indicate times when data are missing.<br />

COLA<br />

LLLB<br />

JCC<br />

H2O<br />

KIP<br />

Bromirski, P.D., R.E. Flick, and N. Graham, Ocean wave height determined from inland seismometer data: Implications for investigating wave climate changes in the NE<br />

Pacific, J. Geophys. Res., 104 (C9), 20,753-20,766, 1999.<br />

Bromirski, P.D., Vibrations from the “Perfect Storm”, Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 2(7), doi:10.1029/2000GC000119, 2001.<br />

Bromirski, P.D., and F.K. Duennebier, The near-coastal microseism spectrum: Spatial and temporal wave climate relationships, J. Geophys. Res., 107 (B8), 2166,<br />

10.1029/2001JB000265, 2002.<br />

Bromirski, P.D., D.R. Cayan, and R.E. Flick, Wave spectral energy variability in the northeast Pacific, J. Geophys. Res., 110(C3), C03005 10.1029/2004JC002398, 2005a.<br />

Bromirski, P.D., F.K. Duennebier, and R.A. Stephen, Mid-ocean microseisms, Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 6, doi:10.1029/2004GC000768, 2005b.<br />

Stephen, R.A., F.N. Spiess, J.A. Collins, J.A. Hildebrand, J.A. Orcutt, K.R. Peal, F.L. Vernon, and F.B. Wooding, 4 (10), 1092, Ocean seismic network pilot experiment,<br />

Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 4 (10), 1092, doi:10.1029/2002GC000485, 2003.<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!