NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS
NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS
NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
MONITORING OTHER SEISMIC SOURCES<br />
2006 <strong>IRIS</strong> 5-YEAR PROPOSAL<br />
Mid-Ocean-Bottom and Land-based Microseism Correlations<br />
Peter D. Bromirski • Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD<br />
Fred K. Duennebier • University of Hawaii, Honolulu<br />
Ralph A. Stephen • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
Inversion of the double-frequency (DF) microseism band for ocean wave heights from archived seismic data can provide an<br />
important diagnostic of climate change (Bromirski et al., 1999; Bromirski et al., 2005a). The usefulness of such inversions requires<br />
knowledge of the source areas and propagation attributes of microseisms. The Hawaii-2 Observatory (H2O) is an excellent site for<br />
studying microseism characteristics since it is located far from shorelines and shallow water. The DF microseism band can be divided<br />
into short period and long period bands, SPDF and LPDF, respectively. A strong correlation of seismic amplitude with wind speed<br />
and direction is observed at H2O in the SPDF band from about 0.20 to 0.45 Hz (Bromirski et al., 2005b), implying that the energy<br />
reaching the ocean floor is generated locally by ocean gravity waves. Near-shore land seismic stations see similar SPDF spectra, also<br />
generated locally by wind seas. Correlation of swell height above<br />
H2O with the LPDF band from 0.085 to 0.20 Hz is often poor,<br />
implying that a significant portion of this energy originates at distant<br />
locations. The LPDF microseism signals recorded at the H2O<br />
correlate with signals at other seismic stations around the North<br />
Pacific, clearly shown by comparing difference spectrograms<br />
(Figure 1). Comparison of relative amplitudes gives an indication<br />
of the source region, e.g. higher relative amplitudes at COLA<br />
and LLLB compared with JCC, H2O, and KIP implies a Pacific<br />
Northwest coastal source region. The times of low relative microseism<br />
energy correlate across the stations, indicating that there is<br />
little energy being coupled into LPDF microseisms anywhere in<br />
the North Pacific during these times. Most of the LPDF energy<br />
at H2O appears to be generated by high amplitude storm waves<br />
impacting long stretches of coastline nearly simultaneously, and<br />
the Hawaiian Islands appear to be a significant source of LPDF<br />
energy in the North Pacific when waves arrive from particular<br />
directions. The highest DF levels observed at mid-ocean site<br />
H2O occur in the SPDF band when two coincident nearby storm<br />
systems develop. This extreme event at H2O is not observed at<br />
continental sites, indicating high attenuation of these signals. At<br />
near-coastal seismic land stations, both SPDF and LPDF microseism<br />
levels are generally dominated by local generation at nearby<br />
shorelines (Bromirski and Duennebier, 2002). High relative SPDF<br />
levels are generally not observed concurrently at JCC and H2O<br />
(Figure 1), indicating that DF microseisms generated near H2O<br />
do not propagate well, consistent with low effective Q, and also<br />
indicating that open-ocean generated DF microseisms will not<br />
significantly affect the statistics of ocean wave parameters determined<br />
from inversion of land microseismic spectra.<br />
Frequency (Hz)<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
D 10 20 30J 10 20 30F<br />
December 2001 − January 2002<br />
−10 −5 0 5 10 15<br />
Spectral Difference (dB)<br />
Difference spectrograms of vertical component data from<br />
eastern North Pacific seismic stations located in Hawaii (KIP),<br />
central Alaska (COLA), southwestern Canada (LLLB), northwestern<br />
California (JCC, NCEDC), and mid-ocean H2O during<br />
December 2001 and January, 2002, showing the similarity<br />
of energy in the LPDF microseism band. Dark vertical strips<br />
indicate times when data are missing.<br />
COLA<br />
LLLB<br />
JCC<br />
H2O<br />
KIP<br />
Bromirski, P.D., R.E. Flick, and N. Graham, Ocean wave height determined from inland seismometer data: Implications for investigating wave climate changes in the NE<br />
Pacific, J. Geophys. Res., 104 (C9), 20,753-20,766, 1999.<br />
Bromirski, P.D., Vibrations from the “Perfect Storm”, Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 2(7), doi:10.1029/2000GC000119, 2001.<br />
Bromirski, P.D., and F.K. Duennebier, The near-coastal microseism spectrum: Spatial and temporal wave climate relationships, J. Geophys. Res., 107 (B8), 2166,<br />
10.1029/2001JB000265, 2002.<br />
Bromirski, P.D., D.R. Cayan, and R.E. Flick, Wave spectral energy variability in the northeast Pacific, J. Geophys. Res., 110(C3), C03005 10.1029/2004JC002398, 2005a.<br />
Bromirski, P.D., F.K. Duennebier, and R.A. Stephen, Mid-ocean microseisms, Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 6, doi:10.1029/2004GC000768, 2005b.<br />
Stephen, R.A., F.N. Spiess, J.A. Collins, J.A. Hildebrand, J.A. Orcutt, K.R. Peal, F.L. Vernon, and F.B. Wooding, 4 (10), 1092, Ocean seismic network pilot experiment,<br />
Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 4 (10), 1092, doi:10.1029/2002GC000485, 2003.<br />
44