06.03.2014 Views

NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS

NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS

NEW_Accomplishments.indd - IRIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2006 <strong>IRIS</strong> 5-YEAR PROPOSAL SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS<br />

Quality Control of GSN Sensor Response Information<br />

Peter Davis • University of California, San Diego<br />

The Mw 9.0 Sumatran earthquake provides a special opportunity to validate the accuracy of sensor responses. We are in<br />

the process of comparing the consistency of free oscillation amplitudes measurements against observations of lunar tides to<br />

investigate how accurate are the GSN instrument responses IDA reports to the community.<br />

Shown inthe figure are observations of the M2 lunar tide and the mode 0 S 0 each normed to their respective expected values.<br />

For the tides, the observed tide at each station was compared to that of a synthetic based upon current models of ocean<br />

loading. For the mode, the data are expressed as deviation from the mean for the set. The consistency between the two sets<br />

suggests that there is a problem with the published amplitude response. This is quite possible: the accepted GSN practice is to<br />

-<br />

sor manufacturerʼs value for the generator constant.<br />

Scatter plot of the M2 tidal amplitude deviations<br />

vs observed 0 S 0 amplitudes at <strong>IRIS</strong>/IDA<br />

stations during January 2005 following the<br />

Mw 9.0 Sumbawan quake. The network scatter<br />

for each period is higher than expected<br />

from instrument calibrations for reasons we<br />

are investigating.<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!