20.03.2014 Views

Checklist of Bolivian Compositae - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Checklist of Bolivian Compositae - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Checklist of Bolivian Compositae - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Jungia (Martrasia) affinis Gardner, London J. Bot. 6: 460 (1847). Type: ‗HAB. Woods between Arrayas and San<br />

Domingos, Province <strong>of</strong> Goyaz. May, 1840.‘ [Gardner] 4263. Lectotype (selected by Harling, 1994: 74): BM;<br />

isolectotypes: G, GH, K, NY (00180296, 00180297, 00180298), P, W.<br />

Jungia floribunda Less. var. affinis (Gardner) Baker in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(3): 393 (1884).<br />

Jungia tomentosa Sch.Bip. ex Baker in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(3): 393 (1884), nom. nud. pro syn. sub. Jungia floribunda<br />

var. affinis<br />

Jungia pubescens (Lag.) Kuntze var. floribunda (Less.) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 3(3): 161 (1898).<br />

Jungia pubescens (Lag.) Kuntze var. tomentosa Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 3(3): 161 (1898). Type: not cited. Harling<br />

(1994: 74) cited: ‗ ―Brasilia, in humidis St. Carlos, Apr. 34‖, Riedel 98‘. Holotype: LE; isotype: P. [NB. This is<br />

difficult to accept since nothing at all was cited in Kuntze (1898: 161) other than a cryptic reference to<br />

Sch.Bip. after the name, and nothing is clear from the Flora Brasiliensis account (Baker, 1884: 393–394), other<br />

than mention <strong>of</strong> ‗praeterea: Riedel!‘].<br />

Argentina, Bolivia (La Paz, Santa Cruz), Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay.<br />

Wet forest, gallery forest, grassland, cerrado, <strong>of</strong>ten in swampy localities.<br />

400–1500 m.<br />

October–July.<br />

Vernacular names: ARNICA, ARNICA RAPAI (Cabrera, 1998); ARNICA, ARNICA RAPAI, BEIRA DA MATA, ERVA DO SAPO, HIGO DEL<br />

BOSQUE, YAGUARETÉ-PÓ, YAGUARETÍ-PÍ (Freire et al., 2006); HIGO DEL BOSQUE (Bolivia), BEIRA DE MATA (Brazil), YAGUARETÍ-PÍ,<br />

YAGUARETÉ-PÓ (Paraguay)(Harling, 1995).<br />

Jungia floribunda Less. var. affinis (Gardner) Baker in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(3): 393 (1884) = Jungia floribunda Less.<br />

*Jungia grossulariifolia Rusby, Descr. New Sp. S. Amer. Pl. : 164 (1920) = Jungia polita Griseb.<br />

Jungia herzogiana Beauverd in/ex Herzog, Planzenw. Bolivischen Anden : 188 (1923), nom. nud. = Jungia<br />

pauciflora Rusby ssp. pauciflora<br />

*Jungia herzogiana Beauverd ex J. Koster, Blumea 5(3): 683 (1945) = Jungia pauciflora Rusby ssp. pauciflora<br />

?Jungia jelskii Hieron., Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 36(5): 512 (1905) = Jungia rugosa Less.<br />

Jungia malvifolia Muschl., Beibl. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 50(2/3), Beibl. 111: 105 (1913) = Jungia rugosa Less.<br />

Jungia mandonii Sch.Bip., Bull. Soc. Bot. France 12: 79 (1865); Linnaea 34(5): 527 (Feb. 1866), nom. nud. (based<br />

on Mandon 16) = Jungia pauciflora Rusby ssp. pauciflora<br />

*Jungia orbicularis Rusby, Bull. New York Bot. Gard. 4(14): 401 (1907) = Jungia pauciflora Rusby ssp.<br />

pauciflora<br />

*Jungia pauciflora Rusby, Bull. New York Bot. Gard. 4(14): 401 (1907). Types: [Bolivia:] ‗([Bang] No. 2048.)<br />

This is very near to Mandon 16, and Mathews’ plant from Chachapoya, Peru, and I am disposed to regard<br />

them as identical, although the one here described has stouter and shorter peduncles, larger heads and<br />

flowers and the pappus shoerter in proportion to the corollas, I do not therefore take up the proposed name<br />

<strong>of</strong> Schultz-Bipontinus.‘ Harling (1995: 61) merely noted that Bang 2048 was the holotype, without<br />

acknowledging that Mandon 16 (on which Schultz Bipontinus‘ nom. nud. J. mandonii was based) and the<br />

Mathews collection were cited in the protologue.<br />

ssp. pauciflora<br />

Jungia mandonii Sch.Bip., Bull. Soc. Bot. France 12: 79 (1865); Linnaea 34(5): 527 (Feb. 1866), nom. nud. (based<br />

on Madon 16).<br />

*Jungia pubescens (Lag.) Kuntze var. boliviensis Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 3(3): 161 (1898). Types: ‗Bolivia: Tunari<br />

3400 m, Cochabamba.‘ [‗BOLIVIA. Cochabamba, 3000 m, 26 Mar 1892, Kuntze s.n.; Tunari, 3400 m, Apr-May<br />

1892, Kuntze s.n. (2 sheets).‘ – according to Wetter & Zardoni, 1985: 333] Syntypes: NY (Tunari, 3400 m,<br />

1892 – 00180309, Tunari, 3400 m, Apr-Mar. – 00180310, Cochabamba, 3000 m, 26 Mar 1892 – 00180311).<br />

*Jungia orbicularis Rusby, Bull. New York Bot. Gard. 4(14): 401 (1907). Types: [Bolivia?] ‗(Specimens without<br />

number.)‘ Lectotype (selected by Harling, 1994: 61): ‗Bolivia, sine loco, Bang s. n.‘ – NY (00038214);<br />

isolectotype: NY (00038213). Harling provided no distinction between these two sheets in his paper but<br />

did, quite clearly, on the specimens themselves!<br />

Jungia herzogiana Beauverd ex Herzog, Planzenw. Bolivischen Anden : 188 (1923), nom. nud.<br />

*Jungia herzogiana Beauverd ex J. Koster, Blumea 5(3): 683 (1945). Types: ‗Hab.: im Gebüsch der Waldgrenze<br />

über Tablas, 3400 m alt., Mai 1911, Bl. weiss, [Herzog] n. 2191. … Steinbach n. 9810 est eadem species.‘<br />

Harling (1995: 61) incorrectly noted ‗L Holotype, G isotype.‘ without actually noting the syntype (Steinbach<br />

9810) that Koster had cited. It is debatable whether Harling‘s citation could be accepted as a<br />

317

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!