20.03.2014 Views

Checklist of Bolivian Compositae - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Checklist of Bolivian Compositae - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Checklist of Bolivian Compositae - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

*Mutisia homoeantha Wedd., Chloris Andina 1: 21 (1855). Type: ‗Hab. BOLIVIE: bord des précipices, dans les<br />

montagnes du sud du département de Chuquisaca!, à une élévation d‘environ 3500 mètres (Wedd.).‘<br />

Holotype: P; isotype: F (970346 -fragments only, 2 leaves, a shoot apex and remnants <strong>of</strong> one capitulum).<br />

Note: Cabrera (1965: 137) cited the holotype as Weddell 4075.<br />

Argentina, Bolivia (Chuquisaca).<br />

3500 m.<br />

*Mutisia iserni Phil., Anales Univ. Chile 85: 823 (1894) = Mutisia cochabambensis Hieron.<br />

Mutisia kurtzii R. E. Fr., Nova Acta Regiae Soc. Sci. Upsal., ser. 4, 1(1): 94 (1905). Type: [Argentina:] ‗Prov.<br />

Jujuy: Tilcara, Quebrada de Juelle, in glareosis (21 Febr. 1901; KURTZ 11732).‘ Holotype: S. Note: Cabrera<br />

(1965: 101) cited the holotype as F. Claren 11732, with the holotype in S and an isotype in BAF.<br />

var. kurtzii<br />

Argentina, Bolivia (?).<br />

Cabrera (1965: 101) suggested that this species might also occur in southern Bolivia, as might the var. anomala<br />

which occurs throughout the same range as the type variety. Both varieties will have to be looked out for.<br />

var. anomala (Lillo) Cabrera, Opera Lilloana 13: 103 (1965).<br />

Mutisia anomala Lillo, [Reseña fitogeográfica de la Prov. de Tucumán.] Actas Prim. Reunión Nac. Soc. Argent.<br />

Ci. Nat., Tucumán 1916: 230 (1919). Type: [Argentina: ?Tucumán] ‗Es un arbusto de hasta 2 metros, comön<br />

en la regiñn de la Puna.‘ [Lectotype (selected by Descole et al., 1939: 61): [Argentina:] ‗Tucumán. Dep.<br />

Trancas: Cumbres Calchaquíes: Lara, alt. 4000 m, Baer, II-1903‘, LIL.] Note: Cabrera (1934: 158), after<br />

providing the relevant extract <strong>of</strong> Lillo‘s text, noted ‗Nomen seminudum‘ but without any other comments.<br />

Lillo provided minimal distinction from Mutisia kurtzii and a note on the locality only. Cabrera‘s Latin<br />

description (Cabrera, 1934: 158) is more than ample to distinguish the taxon, although no type was, but<br />

several specimens were, cited.<br />

var. anomala (Lillo) Cabrera, Revista Invest. Agríc. 11(4): 409 (1958). This new combination (Cabrera, 1958:<br />

409) was not published with full and direct reference to its basionym; it is therefore invalid following ICBN<br />

2006 - Art. 33.4.<br />

Argentina, Bolivia (?).<br />

4000 m.<br />

February.<br />

Note: Descole et al. (1939) have provided a commentary on several <strong>of</strong> Lillo‘s new taxa that appeared in the<br />

‗Resena ...‘ as well as lectotypifying the names they treated, and citing other material in LIL corresponding to<br />

the species. Most <strong>of</strong> Lillo‘s taxa are also illustrated (in Descole et al., 1939) with a half-tone plate <strong>of</strong> the<br />

corresponding lectotype, some also accompanied by black and white illustrations <strong>of</strong> dissections.<br />

Mutisia lanata Ruiz & Pav., Syst. Veg. Fl. Peruv. Chil. 1: 192 (1798). Type: ‗Habitat in Peruviae nemoribus<br />

prope Muða vicum in Pozuz via. Floret à Julio ad Septembrem.‘ Holotype: MA (B4 on micr<strong>of</strong>iche sheet 294 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Ruiz & Pavon herbarium); probable isotype: MA (B2 on micr<strong>of</strong>iche sheet 294 <strong>of</strong> the Ruiz & Pavón<br />

herbarium) but unannotated, other than an MA name label. B3 is similarly identified as M. lanata but is most<br />

probably not original material as the bottom <strong>of</strong> the label is marked ‗Ex Herb. Fl. Peru/anno 1828‘.<br />

Mutisia bipontini Mandon ex Sch.Bip., Bull. Soc. Bot. France 12: 79 (1865); Linnaea 34(5): 527 (Feb. 1866), nom.<br />

nud. (based on Mandon 6).<br />

Mutisia bipontina Mandon ex Rusby, Mem. Torrey Bot. Club 6(1): 68 (1896). Types: [Bolivia:] ‗Espirito Santo,<br />

1891 ([Bang] 1253) = Mandon’s no. 6 and Rusby’s 1549.‘ Lectotype (Cabrera, 1965: 36 – <strong>of</strong> ‗M. bipontini<br />

Mandon‘): Mandon 6 – NY (00230719); isolectotypes: GH (10649), F (972045), NY (00230720 – ex Herb. J.<br />

Torrey, 00230723 – ex W) S, P. Isosyntype (Bang 1253): GH (10648), US (00207126). Note: Cabrera (1965: 36)<br />

effectively only carried out first stage lectotypification as neither <strong>of</strong> the sheets in NY (<strong>of</strong> Mandon 6) were<br />

specified, although NY (00230723) is annotated as ‗Mutisia mandonii Sch.Bip. Cotype!‘, a name which has<br />

never been published.<br />

*Mutisia bipontina Mandon ex Weberb. in Engl. & Drude, Veget. Erde 12: 237 (1911), nom. nud.<br />

Mutisia lanata Ruiz & Pav. var. bipontini (Mandon ex Sch.Bip.) Beauv. ex Herzog in Engl. & Drude, Veget.<br />

Erde 15: 195 (1923), comb. illegit.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!