Checklist of Bolivian Compositae - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Müller, J. (2006). Systematics of Baccharis (Compositae-Astereae) in Bolivia, including an overview of the genus.
Syst. Bot. Monogr. 76: 1–341.
Robinson, H. (1997). New species of Archibaccharis and Baccharis from Bolivia and Peru (Asteraceae:
Astereae). BioLlania, ed. espec. 6: 501–508.
Teodoro Luis, Irmão (1952). Index Baccharidinarum. Contr. Inst. Geobiol. 2: 3–55. [Note: many authors
incorrectly cite the authorities of new taxa, names, and combinations, in this work (as well as others) as
Malagarriga. Teodoro was the name used whilst he was in the religious order, Malagarriga is one version of
his family name used in some later papers, q.v., see also Heras!]
Teodoro Luis, Irmão (1954). Exsiccatae Baccharidinarum. I. Plantae Wilson-Hoehneana. Contr. Inst. Geobiol.
3: 3–9.
A full key to species can be found in Müller (2006).
Baccharis abietina Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 3(3): 131 (1898) = Baccharis grisebachii Hieron.
Baccharis absinthioides Hook. & Arn., Bot. Beechey Voy. : 57 (1832) = Pluchea absinthioides (Hook. & Arn.) H.
Rob. & Cuatrec. [INULEAE].
Baccharis acaulis (Wedd. ex R. E. Fr.) Cabrera, Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 16(3): 255 91975).
Heterothalamus acaulis Wedd. ex Sch.Bip., Linnaea 34(5) 533 (1865); Bull. Soc. Bot. France 12: 81 (1865), nom.
nud. (based on Mandon 209).
Psila caespitosa Phil., Anales Mus. Nac. Chile, Bot. 7: 36, tab. 1, fig. 4 (1891). Types: ‗Plantae feminea de
Machuca 3200 m. s. m., hermaphrodita de Guanaqueros allatae sunt.‘ Syntypes: Pizarro (1960: 154) cited
43827 & 64394 in SGO.
Heterothalamus acaulis Wedd. ex R. E. Fr., Nova Acta Regiae Soc. Sci. Upsal., ser. 4, 1: 79 (1905). Types: ‗… teils
auf das in der botanischen Abteilung des Reichsmuseums zu Stockholm befindlich, mit C-Köpfchen
verschene Mandon‘sche Exemplar (N:o 209. Bolivia, Prov. Larecaja, Viciniis Sorata prope Apacheta de
Logena in graminosis. Reg. alpina 4000 m. Aug. 1859). … [Argentina:] Innerhalb des Gebietes sehr gemein.
– Moreno in locis salsis subhumidis, 3500 m. s. m. (23 Oct. 1901; FR[IES] 701).‗Lectotype (selected by Mùller,
2006: 287): FFries 701 – S; isolectotype: US. Mùller (2006: 289) incorrectly cited ‗Mandon 109‘ as the syntype,
noting duplicates in G, NY, P, S as C; Mandon 209 was mentioned. Mandon 209 is in K.
*Pseudobaccharis acaulis (Wedd. ex R. E. Fr.) Cabrera, Notas Mus. La Plata, Bot. 9(No. 45): 248 (1944).
Argentina, Bolivia (Cochabamba, Oruro, Potosí, Tarija), Chile.
Open saline areas.
3200–4600 m.
Baccharis affinis DC., Prodr. 5: 413 (1836) = Baccharis tridentata Vahl
Baccharis alamanii (as alamani) DC., Prodr. 5: 402 (1836) = Baccharis salicifolia (Ruiz & Pav.) Pers. ssp.
salicifolia
*Baccharis alpina Kunth in Humb., Bonpl. & Kunth, Nov. Gen. Sp. 4 (ed. folio): 48 (1818). Type: [Ecuador:]
‗Crescit cum præcedente. L‘ [Baccharis humifusa Kunth, q.v.] ‗Crescit in radicibus montis Pichinchæ et
Antisanæ, alt. 1500 hex. (Regno Quitensi.) L Floret Januario.‘ [# 2281] Holotype: P-Bonpl.; isotypes: B-W-
15567, F (frag.), P.
*Baccharis alpina Kunth var. serpyllifolia Wedd., Chloris Andina 1: 168 (1856). Type: ‗Baccharis serpyllifolia
Dcne., mscr., in Herb. Mus. par.‘ NB. At the end of the description of B. alpina Weddell (1855: 169)
provided a long list of collections amongst which it must be assumed are types of the infraspecific taxa he
earlier described – ‗Hab. ÉQUATEUR: Andes de Quito, á la hauteur de 3000 mètres (Humb. et Bonpl.), et
jusqu‘au niveau des neiges perpétuelles (Jameson, exsicc., ann. 1856, n. 274 et 285). – PÉROU: Cordillères du
département de Cuzco et de Tacna, etc., h. 4000-4500 mètr., et sur les rochers des montagnes qui avoisinent
le lac de Titicaca! (Gay, Wedd.). – BOLIVIE: Cordillères de la Paz! et de Potosi!à la hauteur de 4000 à 5000
mètres (d’Orbigny, n. 1401; Wedd.).‘ Syntypes: P. Lectotype (selected by Mùller, 2006: 202): ‗BOLIVIA. Potosí:
Prov. Frías, Potosí, F, d’Orbigny 1401‘ – P-218371; islectotypes: BR, G, P-218372, W.
Baccharis alpina Kunth var. surculosa Wedd., Chloris Andina 1: 168 (1856). Type: apparently not cited
according to Müller (2006: 201), but see above. Neotype (selected, as lectotype, by Cuatrecasas, 1969: 219):
67