20.03.2014 Views

Checklist of Bolivian Compositae - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Checklist of Bolivian Compositae - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Checklist of Bolivian Compositae - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

*Mikania haenkeana DC., Prodr. 5: 196 (1836). Type: ‗– in montanis Peruanis Orinocensibus legit cl. Haenke.<br />

... (v.s. in h. Henk. ab. ill. de Sternberg comm.)‘. Holotype: PR; isotype: G-DC.<br />

Willoughbya haenkeana (DC.) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 1: 372 (1891).<br />

Mikania pellucidivenia Hieron., Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 36: 474 (1905). Types: ‗Peruvia: crescit prope Tambillo (J.[elski]<br />

n. 600, 10. m. Aug. 1878; n. 642, 13. m. Aug. 1878).‘<br />

Mikania monzonensis Hieron., Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 40: 391 (1908). Type: ‗Peruvia: habitat prope Monzon, dep.<br />

Huanaco, prov. Huamalies, alt. s. m. 900–1000 m, in silvis raris fruticetisque (A. WEBERBAUER n. 3430; 23.<br />

m. Julii 1903).‘ Holotype: Bú.<br />

Argentina, Bolivia (La Paz, Santa Cruz), ?Ecuador, Peru.<br />

Forests, riversides.<br />

500–2000 m.<br />

July–August.<br />

Mikania hexagona B. L. Rob., Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts 47: 196 (1911) = Mikania microptera DC.<br />

Mikania hookeriana DC., Prodr. 5: 195 (1836). Type: ‗Z? in Guianâ. ... (v.s. in h. Lindl. à cl. Hooker comm.)‘.<br />

Note: There is one specimen in G-DC (fragments – one leaf and a small part <strong>of</strong> an inflorescence). Rather<br />

surprisingly Holmes (1990: 17) has equated this with Schomburgk 479 and cited the fragmentary specimen in<br />

G-DC as the holotype, with a duplicate in K. There are two duplicates <strong>of</strong> this Schomburgk collection in K, one<br />

ex herb. Benthamianum, the other ex herb. Hookerianum, and both are clearly marked Schomburgk 1837, the<br />

former on a script label, the other written on the sheet itself. This coincides with Schomburgk‘s expeditions<br />

to ‗British Guiana‘ and were probably collected in 1837 (rather than distributed then), one year after the<br />

publication <strong>of</strong> de Candolle‘s Prodromus volume 5. It is also worth noting comments in Bentham‘s first paper<br />

on Schomburgk‘s plants (Ann. Nat. Hist. 2(8): 105–111. Oct. 1838) covering part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Compositae</strong>.<br />

Schomburgk 479 is mentioned alongside ‗Mikania Hookeriana. DC. Prod. 5. p. 195.‘ (p. 109). Bentham<br />

enumerated Schomburgk‘s <strong>Compositae</strong> collections following the volume five <strong>of</strong> the Prodromus. It is highly<br />

unlikely that Schomburgk material was used to describe this species. Type material may well exist in CGE.<br />

Robinson & Holmes (2008: 244) cited the holotype, by an unknown collector, as in K, with a fragment in G-<br />

DC.<br />

Mikania badieri DC., Prodr. 5: 194 (1836). Type: ‗LZ in Guadalupâ legit olim Badier [137]; an fortè etiam in<br />

Jamaicâ si Eupat. houstonis Swartz obs. p. 300 huc referendum. ... (v.s.)‘. The Badier material is in G-DC.<br />

*Mikania platyphylla DC., Prodr. 5: 195 (1836). Type: ‗Z in Peruviâ? ex coll. Poeppig [2184]. ... (v.s. comm. à cl.<br />

inv.)‘. Holotype: G-DC.<br />

Mikania imrayana Griseb., Fl. Brit. W. I. : 363 (1861). Type: ‗HAB. Dominica!, Imr[ay].‘ Holotype: K; isotype/s:<br />

K ?2. Note: the material that is supposedly the holotype (ex Herb. Hookerianum) bears a label in part by<br />

Imray, but completed with the specific epithet by Grisebach. There are two potential isotypes in K, one<br />

clearly an Imray collection, numbered ‗111‘ on the sheet itself, and a second sheet bears a label apparently<br />

written entirely by Grisebach, although purportedly also an Imray collection but without a number. There<br />

is a duplicate <strong>of</strong> Imray 52 in GOET.<br />

Willoughbya imrayana (Griseb.) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 1: 372 (1891).<br />

Willoughbya platyphylla (DC.) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 1: 372 (1891).<br />

Mikania badieri DC. var. kittsiana Urb., Symb. Antill. 5(2): 220 (May 1907). Type: ‗Hab. in St. Kitt‘s in<br />

faucibus sylvaticis ad Belmont, m. Sept. – Oct. fl. et fr.: Britton et Cowell n. 385.‘ Holotype: ?US (419943);<br />

isotypes: K, ?NY (00126671). Note: Holmes (1990: 17) indicated that the holotype was in US, but later<br />

Robinson & Holmes (2008: 244) cited the holotype as in NY and an isotype in US.<br />

Mikania vitrea B. L. Rob., Contr. Gray Herb. 61: 22 (1920). Type: ‗VENEZUELA: Colonia Tovar in the State <strong>of</strong><br />

Aragua, alt. 1983 m., August Fendler, no. 2349‘. Holotype: GH (10508); isotypes: G, K, PH.<br />

Mikania hylibates B. L. Rob., Cont. Gray Herb. 77: 52 (1926). Type: ‗COSTA RICA: large woody vine in wet<br />

forests; leaves thick; flowers white, El Muñeco, south <strong>of</strong> Navarro, Province <strong>of</strong> Carago, alt. about 1400 m.,<br />

Feb 8, 9, 1924, Paul C. Standley, no. 33,848.‘ Holotype: US (01226446); isotype: GH (fragment <strong>of</strong> holotype).<br />

Mikania hookeriana DC. var. badieri (DC.) B. L. Rob., Contr. Gray Herb. 104: 52 (1934).<br />

Mikania hookeriana DC. var. var. kittsiana (Urb.) B. L. Rob., Contr. Gray Herb. 104: 52 (1934).<br />

Mikania hookeriana DC. var. platyphylla (DC.) B. L. Rob., Contr. Gray Herb. 104: 52 (1934).<br />

Mikania hookeriana DC. var. cardiophylla B. L. Rob., Contr. Gray Herb. 104: 53 (1934). Type: ‗St. Vincents,<br />

Lesser Antilles, H. H. & G. W. Smith, no. 1890‘. Holotype: GH (10214); isotype: K.<br />

365

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!