Bangladesh - Belgium

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Citizens’ Voice and Accountability Evaluation – <strong>Bangladesh</strong> Country Case Study brought to the attention of authorities will tend to be skewed to their interests. 116
Citizens’ Voice and Accountability Evaluation – <strong>Bangladesh</strong> Country Case Study III: Models of Change Developed Assumptions Activities OutputsOutcomes If people have an awareness of their rights to information and greater access to information they are able to pursue better livelihoods Creating a grassroots demand for information puts pressure on duty bearers to provide information Building the capacity of communities to solve local problems and PPeace, interact with the UP will lead to greater harmony and , good governance Establish Rural Advocacy Centres (RACs) and Information Centres (ICs) Raise awareness about people’s rights to information Provide information Support local journalists to write on local issues and raise issues Memoranda sent to concerned service providers highlighting complaints and demands Name and shame tactics in news media Use of the RACs and ICs. News reading habit developed. Discussion groups meeting Participation in cultural events, meetings, workshops around RTI Improved service delivery and access to resources for the poor Institutionalised interface between service providers and community (e.g. sustained MTP) Local capacity to solve local issues and interact with UP Local journalists continue to write articles on development and corruption issues Facilitate platforms for interaction between UP and other service providers and communities (e.g. Meet the People) 117
Page 1 and 2:
Swiss Agency for Development and Co
Page 3 and 4:
Citizens’ Voice and Accountabilit
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
vMwiK gZ cÖKvk Ges Revew`wnZv g~j
Page 9 and 10:
wewmwmGm M‡elYv `jwU †gvU GMviw
Page 11 and 12:
Dr‡KvP Qvov miKvwi †mev¸‡jvi
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84: Citizens’ Voice and Accountabilit
Page 101 and 102: Development partner Strategic inten
Page 133: Citizens’ Voice and Accountabilit
Page 147 and 148: IV Relevant Primary and Secondary d
Page 149 and 150: II: Overall Assessment of Intervent
Page 151 and 152: Impact According to the 2007 Impact
Page 153 and 154: Model of change Assumptions Activit
Page 155 and 156: D.8. Bangladesh Sanjukta Sramic Fed
Page 157 and 158: Effectiveness BSSF provides 22 trai
Page 159 and 160: . Model of change Assumptions Activ
Page 161 and 162: D.9. Rupantar Grassroots Women’s
Page 163 and 164: Impact Phase 1 resulted in a cadre
Page 165 and 166: Figure 1. Rupantar CVA Model of Cha
Page 167 and 168: Table 2. Most significant change an
Page 169 and 170: D.10. Samata - Empowerment Through
Page 171 and 172: Lessons Learned Important lessons l
Page 175 and 176: Table 2. Most significant change an
Page 177 and 178: D.11. GTZ brokered dialogue within
Page 179 and 180: Sustainability GTZ feels that the f
Page 183 and 184: Project (Donor) Partners/ PIUs Inte
Page 185 and 186:
Project (Donor) Partners/ PIUs Inte
Page 187 and 188:
Annex F. Summary of Stakeholder Deb
show all

Bangladesh - Belgium

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?