Bangladesh - Belgium
Bangladesh - Belgium
Bangladesh - Belgium
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Citizens’ Voice and Accountability Evaluation – <strong>Bangladesh</strong> Country Case Study<br />
Impact<br />
CAMPE stakeholders make a strong case that the impact on primary education policy is observable:<br />
The following recommendations reportedly made their way into government policy<br />
recommendations:<br />
> recommendation that more women should participate in the School Management<br />
Committees (SMCs). They just heard that govt is increasing women’s participation to 40%<br />
from next year<br />
> you must give free books if you want to achieve the MDG2.<br />
> make teacher’s pool through competitive examination in order to improve standards<br />
(based on 2005 EW report 2/3 of rural teachers college graduates with a high % of 3 rd class<br />
degrees)<br />
> Aim for a primary student:teacher target ratio of 40:1<br />
> CAMPE found that female teachers are more effective and recommended an increase in<br />
female teacher numbers. The Government moved to 50:50 target; they have increased so<br />
far to 38% female teachers)<br />
> CAMPE advised support for post primary distance learning education<br />
> PDP I and II content is significantly influenced by CAMPE policy analysis (although this is<br />
unacknowledged by Government)<br />
>. CAMPE research found problems with the distribution of a stipend for disability etc under<br />
the Food for Education Programme.<br />
CAMPE’s EW members have grassroots connections which lends credibility to their data/ analysis.<br />
CAMPE analysed the impact of creeping privatisation in the education sector and discussed the<br />
implications for rural-urban discrimination and exclusion of poorest families. Based on this analysis,<br />
EW recommended increasing the budget for public education.<br />
CAMPE brought in the media to spotlight problems. For example, the Government’s Total Literacy<br />
Movement (TLM) declared some districts illiteracy-free and claimed 63% literacy levels. However,<br />
CAMPE’s survey came up with a figure of 45% literacy and that used the media to highlight this<br />
discrepancy and prompt debate.<br />
CAMPE stakeholders also suggest that the government used to be motivated by quantity goals (e.g.<br />
literacy eradication) but now, partly due to the continuing influence of CAMPE, are focussing more<br />
on quality and sustainability issues<br />
CAMPE is also co-ordinating the mapping Non Formal Education (NFE) with Government<br />
participation and support. Note that 'NFE Mapping' is another study which is being conducted by the<br />
government and coordinated by CAMPE. This mapping process identifies and educates adult<br />
illiterates and others who wouldn’t go into formal education, representing a short- to medium-term<br />
bridging mechanism as part of long-term goal of mainstreaming education. There is an important<br />
element in this NFE process of involving community people in delivering NFE. The inputs sequence<br />
need-based training (vocational skills) for 6 months on the back of literacy training.<br />
CAMPE also emphasis bridging the national with the local by bringing in teachers and local<br />
stakeholders to discuss their experiences/ raise voice with PEDP officials.<br />
Sustainability<br />
Donor funding for CAMPE has avoided the pitfalls of creating externally imposed, costly and<br />
unsustainable project mechanisms. As mentioned above, donor support for CAMPE builds on a<br />
voluntary-based sense of participation by professionals in the education field. CAMPE’s Education<br />
Watch members, for instance, are known as highly experienced resources; “all the known people in<br />
the country”. 65<br />
Neither are the project outputs are not too ambitious. One important output is the annual Education<br />
65 The technical team revolves (e.g. this years EW report was led by the <strong>Bangladesh</strong> Economic<br />
Federation), while the EW Advisory Group is constant. The Working group is also more or less<br />
constant.<br />
121