10.05.2014 Views

Bangladesh - Belgium

Bangladesh - Belgium

Bangladesh - Belgium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Citizens’ Voice and Accountability Evaluation – <strong>Bangladesh</strong> Country Case Study<br />

Impact<br />

CAMPE stakeholders make a strong case that the impact on primary education policy is observable:<br />

The following recommendations reportedly made their way into government policy<br />

recommendations:<br />

> recommendation that more women should participate in the School Management<br />

Committees (SMCs). They just heard that govt is increasing women’s participation to 40%<br />

from next year<br />

> you must give free books if you want to achieve the MDG2.<br />

> make teacher’s pool through competitive examination in order to improve standards<br />

(based on 2005 EW report 2/3 of rural teachers college graduates with a high % of 3 rd class<br />

degrees)<br />

> Aim for a primary student:teacher target ratio of 40:1<br />

> CAMPE found that female teachers are more effective and recommended an increase in<br />

female teacher numbers. The Government moved to 50:50 target; they have increased so<br />

far to 38% female teachers)<br />

> CAMPE advised support for post primary distance learning education<br />

> PDP I and II content is significantly influenced by CAMPE policy analysis (although this is<br />

unacknowledged by Government)<br />

>. CAMPE research found problems with the distribution of a stipend for disability etc under<br />

the Food for Education Programme.<br />

CAMPE’s EW members have grassroots connections which lends credibility to their data/ analysis.<br />

CAMPE analysed the impact of creeping privatisation in the education sector and discussed the<br />

implications for rural-urban discrimination and exclusion of poorest families. Based on this analysis,<br />

EW recommended increasing the budget for public education.<br />

CAMPE brought in the media to spotlight problems. For example, the Government’s Total Literacy<br />

Movement (TLM) declared some districts illiteracy-free and claimed 63% literacy levels. However,<br />

CAMPE’s survey came up with a figure of 45% literacy and that used the media to highlight this<br />

discrepancy and prompt debate.<br />

CAMPE stakeholders also suggest that the government used to be motivated by quantity goals (e.g.<br />

literacy eradication) but now, partly due to the continuing influence of CAMPE, are focussing more<br />

on quality and sustainability issues<br />

CAMPE is also co-ordinating the mapping Non Formal Education (NFE) with Government<br />

participation and support. Note that 'NFE Mapping' is another study which is being conducted by the<br />

government and coordinated by CAMPE. This mapping process identifies and educates adult<br />

illiterates and others who wouldn’t go into formal education, representing a short- to medium-term<br />

bridging mechanism as part of long-term goal of mainstreaming education. There is an important<br />

element in this NFE process of involving community people in delivering NFE. The inputs sequence<br />

need-based training (vocational skills) for 6 months on the back of literacy training.<br />

CAMPE also emphasis bridging the national with the local by bringing in teachers and local<br />

stakeholders to discuss their experiences/ raise voice with PEDP officials.<br />

Sustainability<br />

Donor funding for CAMPE has avoided the pitfalls of creating externally imposed, costly and<br />

unsustainable project mechanisms. As mentioned above, donor support for CAMPE builds on a<br />

voluntary-based sense of participation by professionals in the education field. CAMPE’s Education<br />

Watch members, for instance, are known as highly experienced resources; “all the known people in<br />

the country”. 65<br />

Neither are the project outputs are not too ambitious. One important output is the annual Education<br />

65 The technical team revolves (e.g. this years EW report was led by the <strong>Bangladesh</strong> Economic<br />

Federation), while the EW Advisory Group is constant. The Working group is also more or less<br />

constant.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!