Bangladesh - Belgium

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Project (Donor) Partners/ PIUs Interviews/FGDS Documents reviewed Area Office, Batiaghata • FGD with Samata filed staff, Rupantar Area Office, Batiaghata • FGD with Ward women coordination committee leaders, WCC Office, Amirpur Union • FGD with Union women coordination committee leaders, WCC Office, Baliadanga Union • FGD with Upazila women coordination committee leaders, Rupantar Area Office, Batiaghata • FGD with a group of women, Rupantar Area Office, Batiaghata • FGD with a group of men, Rupantar Area Office, Batiaghata • SDC March 2004 Credit Proposal ( internal document) ‘Rupantar: Grassroots Women’s Leadership Phase 2 • SDC July 2007 Credit Proposal ( internal document) ‘Rupantar: Grassroots Women’s Leadership Phase 3 10. Samata: Empowerment through Resource Mobilisation Programme (DFID, Sida, Norad) Samata • Dr. Indranil Chakrabarti, Social Development Adviser (DFID-B) • Md. Abdul Kader, executive Director (Samata) • Md. Amzad Hossain, Director (Implementation) (Samata) • Md. Sarowar Alam, Director (Program) (Samata) • Ms. Zafrunnahar Shelly, Deputy Director (GRD) (Samata) • DFID, 2001. Samata: Empowerment through Resource Mobilisation Programme: Project Memorandum, DFID Dhaka, 16 August • J Gardener, M S Huq and A Chowdhury, 2006. Samata: Empowerment through Resource Mobilisation Programme Output to Purpose Review, DFID Dhaka, July • Meta-development, 2007. Impact Assessment of Social Mobilisation for Economic Empowerment, Draft 31 October • Samata, nd. Annual Report 2006 • Samata, nd. AGRP Report, June 05-December 07, AGRP & MIS Unit, PIMERC 168
Annex F. Summary of Stakeholder Debriefing Workshop Bangladesh Citizen Voice and Accountability: Stakeholder Debriefing Workshop Hotel Crystal Garden, Wednesday 19 th December, 2008 Break-out Group Donor Group Break-out group questions and summary of discussion How coherent is the donor theory of change about CVA in Bangladesh? Is the total effect of donor activity in CVA more than the sum of the parts? • Theory of Change: Agreed that this is important • Results-Based Management: How to measure? • Core funding among some donors already exists but it maybe that we are a little bit pushy on this > too directive: How can we be more supportive to the wishes of local stakeholders? • Challenge to find a local counterpart on the government side: it is not clear who are the (potential) change makers with authority to make decisions. This is why it is often easier to stick to the lively demand side (while acknowledging that the demand side actors themselves are not always accountable) • Joined up approach: Analyse activities and assess what works and what does not (i.e. just like this workshop, so we are looking forward to the findings of this evaluation and hoping for recommendations) How does the donor concern with poverty reduction/MDGs impact on their CVA interventions? • Poverty reduction focus links to our concern with scale and outreach. This is a significant influence on our approach (e.g. Challenge Fund which is a step back from understanding the reality on the ground. It is much more indirect which is a risk. Reflects tension of reaching MDG goals • Awareness amongst donors that multiple funding through different channels to NGOs creates distortions, perverted incentives and risks: “we are very aware of this and our discussions are ongoing… we put much of the blame on ourselves for creating these distortions” Govt Group Civil Society Group How can government reform itself towards enhanced CVA? • National reform Commission and Local Government Reforms represent CVA enhancement • Change requires incentives and sanctions for a “listening culture” to develop • Union Parishad infrastructure development for one-stop services is good but people need political space as well as physical space.. so this is good, but not enough Are we witnessing an emergence of a “citizenship culture” in Bangladesh and have the donors played a role in this? • Yes, a citizenship culture is emerging, especially in our capacity to articulate demands for change and its impact in the supply side.. but there is a long way to go • Yes donors have played a role, albeit that it is homegrown 169
Page 1 and 2:
Swiss Agency for Development and Co
Page 3 and 4:
Citizens’ Voice and Accountabilit
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
vMwiK gZ cÖKvk Ges Revew`wnZv g~j
Page 9 and 10:
wewmwmGm M‡elYv `jwU †gvU GMviw
Page 11 and 12:
Dr‡KvP Qvov miKvwi †mev¸‡jvi
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Development partner Strategic inten
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136: Citizens’ Voice and Accountabilit
Page 147 and 148: IV Relevant Primary and Secondary d
Page 149 and 150: II: Overall Assessment of Intervent
Page 151 and 152: Impact According to the 2007 Impact
Page 153 and 154: Model of change Assumptions Activit
Page 155 and 156: D.8. Bangladesh Sanjukta Sramic Fed
Page 157 and 158: Effectiveness BSSF provides 22 trai
Page 159 and 160: . Model of change Assumptions Activ
Page 161 and 162: D.9. Rupantar Grassroots Women’s
Page 163 and 164: Impact Phase 1 resulted in a cadre
Page 165 and 166: Figure 1. Rupantar CVA Model of Cha
Page 167 and 168: Table 2. Most significant change an
Page 169 and 170: D.10. Samata - Empowerment Through
Page 171 and 172: Lessons Learned Important lessons l
Page 175 and 176: Table 2. Most significant change an
Page 177 and 178: D.11. GTZ brokered dialogue within
Page 179 and 180: Sustainability GTZ feels that the f
Page 183 and 184: Project (Donor) Partners/ PIUs Inte
Page 185: Project (Donor) Partners/ PIUs Inte
show all

Bangladesh - Belgium

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?