10.05.2014 Views

Bangladesh - Belgium

Bangladesh - Belgium

Bangladesh - Belgium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Citizens’ Voice and Accountability Evaluation – <strong>Bangladesh</strong> Country Case Study<br />

cultural groups, there is a risk of reducing the possibility of enhancing healthy<br />

pluralism.<br />

Recent developments<br />

The range of interviewees met during the Inception Phase, (October, 2007) concur<br />

on the view that <strong>Bangladesh</strong> is currently experiencing “uncertain times”. It is<br />

presently governed by a transition Caretaker Government which intends to stand<br />

down for national elections to take place by December 2008. This arrangement<br />

commenced in January 2007 as a response to months of violent protests by<br />

opposition parties over the electoral system and, in particular, the national elections<br />

which were to have been held in late 2006.<br />

The Caretaker Government initially enjoyed popular support as it vowed to “clean up”<br />

politics, in particular, taking tough action against insidious corruption. However, the<br />

imposition of a state of emergency which included banning all kinds of political<br />

activities, protests and rallies as well as curtailment of freedom of speech was<br />

increasingly criticised amidst allegations of abuse of power. These criticisms came to<br />

a head in August, 2007 with a series of violent student protests. On September 10th,<br />

2007 the Caretaker Government lifted the ban on indoor political meetings to pave<br />

the way for crucial negotiations between the Election Commission and the political<br />

parties on electoral reforms, planned over the following two months. As a<br />

consequence of the state of emergency all meetings regardless of the purpose or the<br />

convenor (NGO, Trade Union, CSO or Government Department) required police<br />

authorization, which included prior approval of all participants as well as the agenda.<br />

The impact of this continues to be felt and even government–led consultation<br />

processes have been curtailed 19 .<br />

The Caretaker Government is determined to stem corruption before the elections.<br />

Over 200,000 people have been arrested including 160 high-profile political leaders<br />

and the leaders of the two main parties, both former Prime Ministers who ruled the<br />

country for 16 years until October, 2006.<br />

There is much speculation regarding the future. It is feared that despite the efforts to<br />

prepare for elections at the end of 2008 including the preparation of a new voters list<br />

and ID cards and instigation of new qualifying regulations for candidates, the two<br />

main parties will boycott the election. The two year transition period is regarded as<br />

too short for the establishment of and mobilization of support for alternative political<br />

parties. Other scenarios suggest the possibility of an institutionalised and expanded<br />

version of the current Caretaker Government arrangement of advisors or further<br />

infiltration by the military.<br />

In principle, the Caretaker Government claims to support not only enhancing<br />

accountability (where the main opportunities appear to currently lie) but also voice. It<br />

has publicly endorsed the Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) which remains the key<br />

document for alignment of development aid. Under the title “Unlocking the Potential;<br />

National Strategy for Accelerated Poverty Reduction, 2005-7”, the document spells<br />

out a commitment to poverty reduction and the Millennium Development Goals.<br />

Along with growth and human development, governance is one of the three key<br />

elements of the policy triangle used in the PRS to determine priorities. The<br />

consultations leading up to development of the PRS gave high priority to improving<br />

governance and suggested a concentration on the local governance agenda, which<br />

is described in the PRS as “central to the critical issues of decentralized servicedelivery,<br />

grass-root accountability and the newer focus on regeneration of local<br />

19 e.g. Local Government Engineering Department has suspended its customary village<br />

consultation process on small infrastructure priorities and feels that its credibility as<br />

participatory agency is being undermined.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!