Bangladesh - Belgium

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Citizens’ Voice and Accountability Evaluation – Bangladesh Country Case Study Type of intervention (as identified by inception workshop participants) Media and information dissemination Awareness raising and mass mobilization Supply/demand side Research Case study proposed 43 to meet elements of the typology Samata, MMC,Rupantar- face to face meetings with local councils (Union Parishads) CAMPE –round table debates Brokered dialogue (GO/PS/Advocacy/TU) (see above) Mass-line Media Centre Samata Oxfam ‘We Can’ programme CAMPE TIB 56
Citizens’ Voice and Accountability Evaluation – Bangladesh Country Case Study Table B.2. How proposed case studies met other criteria 44 Funding modality Urban/rural Special group Stand alone CV & A or integrated ROSC Joint both Out of school children level Supplyside/demand side or both Type of institution integrated local both GO SDC Which of joint evaluation donors supports? LGED Joint rural integrated local both GO GTZ, DfID FMRP Joint both integrated central Primarily supplyside GO DFID MMC Through intermediary (MSJ) Stand alone middle Primarily demand-side NGO Danida (past) DfID CAMPE Direct both Stand alone Primarily central both CSO SDC, Sida CPD Direct both Stand alone Primarily central both CSO Sida. Norad Oxfam Through UK PPA & both women Stand alone Local + national Primarily INGO DfID then through partners level advocacy demand side TIB direct both Stand alone central both CSO DfID Sida Norad BSSF Belgian TU urban workers Stand alone central Primarily TU Belgium demand side Supreme Court Joint Stand alone central Supply-side Guardian Consortium support institution GTZ brokered dialogue GTZ direct urban Stand alone central both Donor/TA led GTZ (Norad supports KN) Election Commission support Joint Stand alone central Supply-side Guardian institution Consortium Rupantar Direct rural women Stand alone local both NGO SDC CODEC Direct rural Fishing integrated local Demand side NGO Danida communities Samata Donor consortium rural Very poor & women Stand alone both Social movement DfID Sida Norad Local with national level advocacy 44 Criteria developed in the Inception workshop 57
Page 1 and 2:
Swiss Agency for Development and Co
Page 3 and 4:
Citizens’ Voice and Accountabilit
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
vMwiK gZ cÖKvk Ges Revew`wnZv g~j
Page 9 and 10:
wewmwmGm M‡elYv `jwU †gvU GMviw
Page 11 and 12:
Dr‡KvP Qvov miKvwi †mev¸‡jvi
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24: Citizens’ Voice and Accountabilit
Page 73: Citizens’ Voice and Accountabilit
Page 101 and 102: Development partner Strategic inten
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
IV Relevant Primary and Secondary d
Page 149 and 150:
II: Overall Assessment of Intervent
Page 151 and 152:
Impact According to the 2007 Impact
Page 153 and 154:
Model of change Assumptions Activit
Page 155 and 156:
D.8. Bangladesh Sanjukta Sramic Fed
Page 157 and 158:
Effectiveness BSSF provides 22 trai
Page 159 and 160:
. Model of change Assumptions Activ
Page 161 and 162:
D.9. Rupantar Grassroots Women’s
Page 163 and 164:
Impact Phase 1 resulted in a cadre
Page 165 and 166:
Figure 1. Rupantar CVA Model of Cha
Page 167 and 168:
Table 2. Most significant change an
Page 169 and 170:
D.10. Samata - Empowerment Through
Page 171 and 172:
Lessons Learned Important lessons l
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Table 2. Most significant change an
Page 177 and 178:
D.11. GTZ brokered dialogue within
Page 179 and 180:
Sustainability GTZ feels that the f
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Project (Donor) Partners/ PIUs Inte
Page 185 and 186:
Project (Donor) Partners/ PIUs Inte
Page 187 and 188:
Annex F. Summary of Stakeholder Deb
show all

Bangladesh - Belgium

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?