Bangladesh - Belgium
Bangladesh - Belgium
Bangladesh - Belgium
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Lessons Learned<br />
Important lessons learned include:<br />
• Social change and social movements are historically situated and explained. This needs to<br />
be taken into consideration when attempting to scale up successful movements.<br />
• Resource distribution can be a highly effective driver of economic, social and political<br />
empowerment.<br />
• Influencing resource distribution to ensure key elements of gender equality (in this case the<br />
50:50 property rights entitlement) can have a transformational impact on gender roles and<br />
relations (see Most Significant Change tables below)<br />
• Pyschological gains such as improved self-esteem, motivation and aspiration can be<br />
achieved through a successful entitlement claim.<br />
• Dramatic gains in social and economic well being and mobility can be achieved within a<br />
generation as evidence by reports of educational attainment of second generation Samata<br />
children.<br />
III: Models of Change Developed<br />
As described above, this project uses social mobilisation for claims against the khas land entitlements<br />
as the starting point for empowerment in social, economic and political spheres (see Figure 1 below).<br />
Recent evaluations and this CVA evaluation suggest that these assumptions are credible and are<br />
sound, with observable and measurable impacts as mapped out in Figure 1. The are only two<br />
significant question marks highlighted in Figure 1. The first is the assumption that because of the<br />
demonstrable progressive impact of a movement that has helped the poorest claim their entitlement<br />
to khas land under a government law, this will somehow enlighten policy makers to bring other<br />
legislation and procedures in line with this model of change. This is certainly not a great claim in the<br />
project or movement, and is more of a tacit assumption. Given the broader political economic and<br />
social context of concentrated power and hierarchy, this assumption must be treated with some<br />
scepticism. The second question mark is over the effect assumption relates to assumed output of the<br />
project a social movement such as Samata can be “modelled”, scaled up and replicated<br />
unproblematically. The historically and geographical specific context of the Samata movement,<br />
combined with the absorptive capacity constraints of the movement, should prompt a serious amount<br />
of reflection on this assumption.<br />
153