Bangladesh - Belgium
Bangladesh - Belgium
Bangladesh - Belgium
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
II: Overall Assessment of Intervention using DAC Criteria<br />
Relevance<br />
In line with the PRS which highlights both women’s advancement and local governance as a key<br />
priorities of the Government of <strong>Bangladesh</strong>.<br />
SDC has local governance as a priority thematic focus and guiding principles of gender equity,<br />
human rights and social justice. Furthermore, this is the only directly supported grassroots NGO in<br />
SDC’s governance portfolio and is seen as important to ‘enable SDC to gain direct field experience<br />
on gender equity, women participation and empowerment and offer the opportunity to consolidate<br />
the experimentation of a women’s leadership development model for wider dissemination and<br />
replication’ (SDC, 2007).<br />
Rupantar’s vision is to ‘establish a gender equitable democratic society with cultural values, free<br />
from injustice and superstitions’.<br />
Recent national and local elections have seen an increase in women exercising their franchise and<br />
since 1997 there have been provisions for three reserved seats on the Union Parishad for women<br />
(each representing three wards). Women’s political empowerment is still constrained by their limited<br />
political awareness, limited access to public platforms and their inexperience in engaging in political<br />
processes. Given external support it has been shown that not only can women become more active<br />
members of UP but will be invited to participate in other forums and have successfully contested<br />
general UP seats (competing against men).<br />
Efficiency<br />
Funding started for this programme in 1998 so in total there will have been 12 years of funding ( by<br />
2010) amounting to approximately Euro 1.27 million (CHF 2 million). The work is concentrated in 20<br />
unions in four Upazila.<br />
The mid-term Evaluation of Rupantar noted its cost effectiveness. The Rupantar model uses staff<br />
from local communities with low salaries and does not provide traditional services. The 2006 Mid<br />
Term Evaluation and SDC’s credit proposal (2007) noted the following achievements:<br />
• 11,566 women organised into women’s groups and ‘aware of their rights’<br />
• competent women leaders, participating in different development work and included in<br />
different local committees (300)<br />
• 15 women elected to reserved seats and 2 to general seats in the 2003 local elections and<br />
100 active in UP standing committees ( while remaining partisan politics-neutral)<br />
Rupantar has a team of 59 project staff, including 20 union organisers and 20 cultural organisers<br />
(1:200 direct beneficiaries) In the third phase, Rupantar intends to cover all the unions (32) in the<br />
four Upazilas (two parliamentary constituencies).<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Over the past 10 years, Rupantar has measurably gone a significant way to developing a norm of<br />
women’s participation and to establish credible women’s organisations in the localities where it<br />
works. Women have competed against men in the UP elections and won seats. Women are invited<br />
to participate in Standing Committee decisions, local shalish (dispute resolution/arbitration<br />
processes) and other village level committees. There is anecdotal evidence that duty bearers are<br />
performing more satisfactorily -- e.g. sub assistant agricultural officers meeting farmers more<br />
regularly, teachers attending schools on time, health staff more regularly present at their duty<br />
stations -- and this is attributed by local stakeholders [see the Most Significant Change (MSC)<br />
analysis in Tables 1-3 below] to the work and engagement by the women’s groups. This is<br />
discussed in more detail under “Impact” below.<br />
144