30.05.2014 Views

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

has been consulted here as well, as is proven by a reworking that became necessary because of<br />

the expansion. In the War, Herod received the thanks and the support of Antony due to the fact<br />

that he distinguished himself during the assault on Samosata by his outstanding courage and<br />

in this way assisted the Romans most vigorously (322). In contrast to this, Ant. 440 ff. has Herod<br />

distinguish himself already on the march to Antony to such an extent that Antony, who heard<br />

about this, [206] honoured Herod on account of these achievements (446). <strong>The</strong>n, when<br />

Samosata had indeed fallen, the Antiquities, which had anticipated the honours, could do<br />

nothing else other than attach Antony’s order to Sossius to support Herod (447) from the later<br />

contents of War 327, so that another acknowledgement of Herod would [result] from this.<br />

<strong>The</strong> additional source [Nebenquelle] used here is characterized once again by precise<br />

knowledge about the twists of fate in Herod’s life [Lebensschicksale], his movements during the<br />

march, etc.; its sympathies lie with Herod, in short, it is the same trend that we have already<br />

had to identify frequently and whose origin will lie in Herod’s memoirs. As regards the factual<br />

relationship of this additional source [Nebenquelle] to Nicolaus, in his more succinct<br />

presentation the latter obviously transferred the merits, which Herod in truth acquired for<br />

himself during the march, to the time directly before the assault; for it is obvious that Nicolaus<br />

with his thought πολλοὺς μὲν τῶν βαρβάρων ἀποκτείνας, πολλὴν δὲ ἀποτεμόμεvος λείαν has<br />

alluded to that very incident, which the additional source [Nebenquelle] Ant 440 ff. has<br />

recounted more thoroughly and correctly. So it is then definite once again that the War has not<br />

condensed, rather the Antiquities has expanded.<br />

This relationship between the two writings, which we have now proven in countless<br />

cases, also exists in that very segment, which Destinon (page 15), who thought he could prove<br />

the opposite, wished to present as particularly instructive for his interpretation: now<br />

supported by the Romans again, Herod, who wishes to conquer Judaea, assembles 800 allies in<br />

Lebanon, – so reads War 329 – draws a Roman legion to himself in that location and marches<br />

into Galilee with these [troops]. In contrast to this, Ant 452 mentions Ptolemais in addition as<br />

one of their destinations. At first glance, this certainly seems to represent an element of a<br />

common source, which has been better preserved in the Antiquities; but one must not consider<br />

this discrepancy in isolation; on the contrary, it also forms an element of the systematic<br />

reworking of the entire passage. <strong>The</strong> War builds its report upon the idea that Herod turned<br />

against his brother’s murderers in the greatest haste: When he receives the news of his<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!