30.05.2014 Views

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Jews must yield to it. Aquila was active in the first third of the second century; his translation<br />

met a need, which must have asserted itself earlier, i.e. right at that time when Justus began his<br />

attack on the Antiquities that was based on the LXX. <strong>The</strong>re is no longer any doubt: Justus has<br />

made use of the mood of <strong>Jewish</strong> orthodoxy, which had become powerful, in order to [deliver a]<br />

crushing attack on <strong>Josephus</strong>’ Antiquities.<br />

And as a result our image of <strong>Josephus</strong>’ major opponent is also brought to life. Justus, a<br />

resident of the strongly Hellenized town of Tiberias is, as was natural, imbued with Greek<br />

education in his youth quite differently than was <strong>Josephus</strong>, and from that [time] onwards he<br />

retained complete mastery of the Greek language until the end of his life. But Justus, who had<br />

remained in Tiberias, experienced the transformations that Judaism underwent differently<br />

than <strong>Josephus</strong>, who had defected from his people. <strong>The</strong> fierce opposition in which he stood to<br />

Agrippa is well enough substantiated, and therefore he could have only scorn and ridicule for<br />

the author of the War, but also for the [author] of the Antiquities; because what <strong>Josephus</strong> had<br />

rendered was by no means in accordance with the view of the Jews; the Antiquities was thus<br />

based on a foundation that Judaism no longer recognized, to say nothing of the War. Due to his<br />

training in [273] Greek culture, Justus felt the inner vocation of presenting genuine Judaism in<br />

its historical development to the pagan world. Unlike <strong>Josephus</strong>, he could write Greek; unlike<br />

him, Justus, who had remained true to his people, knew what they wished to have recognized<br />

as genuine tradition. <strong>The</strong> attack, which Justus directed against <strong>Josephus</strong> upon this basis, was<br />

quite serious indeed.<br />

<strong>Josephus</strong> can have no other rejoinder but that since his youth he has been an expert on<br />

the law – we can believe this of him, but the law that he had learned in his youth was that of<br />

Hellenistic Judaism; he was indeed a priest, – but since his capture he has lost all contact with<br />

the priesthood of the Jews. He was living in Rome and was basking in the favour first of the<br />

emperors and then of Epaphroditus. At the time when he was composing the Antiquities he had<br />

not yet developed any sense for the far-reaching internal movements, which were to take hold<br />

of the Jews around the turn of the century and stamp them for all time; indeed the reaction did<br />

not begin to take hold until the first thirteen books of the Antiquities, which dealt primarily<br />

with this, must have been completed, [which had happened] already quite a while before<br />

93/94; so these books, which were composed in Rome, are still borne entirely by the spirit of<br />

Hellenistic Judaism and the LXX. But when the work actually appeared it must have already<br />

238

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!