30.05.2014 Views

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and are not erected in public places, but were preserved only among Jews and some<br />

barbarians. This discrepancy, however, is impossible for the documents of the Romans; for<br />

they are erected in the public places of the towns and are even engraved still now upon bronze<br />

tablets in the Capitol; when Julius Caesar granted Alexandrian citizenship to the Alexandrian<br />

Jews he even imparted this to them upon a bronze tablet. I shall construct my proof from this<br />

evidence (Ant. 14.186 - 188). After <strong>Josephus</strong> then reproduced the documents, he concludes the<br />

collection – completing the above line of thought [228] — by indicating that he has<br />

reproduced only a selection from the wealth of documentary material of the Capitol and the<br />

bronze inscriptions, since he is of the conviction that this suffices for a basic appreciation of<br />

Rome’s attitude towards the Jews (ibid. 265 ff.). According to <strong>Josephus</strong>’ explicit testimony the<br />

documents [in] 14.144 ff. were likewise to be found in the Capitol. <strong>Josephus</strong> lived in Rome<br />

during the years when he was composing the Antiquities; is there then anything more natural<br />

than that he obtained the documents there, which he believed he could exploit for his<br />

purposes? No one can doubt that the material was indeed available in the Capitol, not only<br />

because <strong>Josephus</strong> tells us this explicitly, but also because everyone could have easily found him<br />

guilty, should he have lied. And are we to assume here that he, who had for example<br />

scrutinized closely what Strabo recounted about the Jews, should have foregone [the<br />

opportunity] in Rome of examining this invaluable material in the Capitol? And if <strong>Josephus</strong> has<br />

handed down to us many documents in a mutilated condition [and] if he did not disclose<br />

others at all, then we may consider this to be the consequences of his difficulty in reading such<br />

documents.<br />

<strong>Josephus</strong> probably sent for other material directly from the <strong>Jewish</strong> communities in the<br />

east; close connections did exist in the diaspora, and surely it was easy for <strong>Josephus</strong> to obtain<br />

these documents. In this point I therefore agree totally with Schürer, who (page 86, note)<br />

likewise considers <strong>Josephus</strong> [to be] the one who collected the documents. Perhaps some<br />

document or other may have become known to him from a literary source, but this changes<br />

nothing in the overall view: <strong>Josephus</strong> has obtained the documents themselves from the<br />

archives and inserted them into his work, in which it so happened that he stumbled almost<br />

constantly. Nevertheless, he was proud of his accomplishment, as is suggested by his repeated<br />

reference to this.<br />

81 As an example I offer Inscription 5, Priene no. 37.<br />

200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!