30.05.2014 Views

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

area for some time? And why are the Tiberians missing, who were also against John according<br />

to the War? We see here too that we are dealing with a vesitge [Überlebsel] of the view that has<br />

its place in the Life but is completely wrong in the War.<br />

6. According to the Life <strong>Josephus</strong> was helped in his flight by his bodyguard James and by<br />

a Tiberian, Herod. In so doing, this one Tiberian stands out conspicuously from the mass of<br />

people from Tiberias who are hostilely disposed towards <strong>Josephus</strong>. But if the Tiberians as a<br />

whole were well disposed towards <strong>Josephus</strong>, then the emphasis on this one man could no<br />

longer have any sense. For this reason <strong>Josephus</strong> turns the Tiberian into a second bodyguard in<br />

War 619. <strong>The</strong> original is therefore given in the Life; the modification is in the War.<br />

In view of such observations, the fundamental fact is obvious to anyone who<br />

understands something about source criticism, that the version of the Life is the original one,<br />

and that the report of the War was formed in such a way that <strong>Josephus</strong> intended to make it<br />

known that his attitude towards Tiberias and Tarichea had shifted, and therefore he<br />

remodelled the presentation of the Life indeed logically, but as a result of precisely this he<br />

created an inherently impossible narrative. Hence, once again, our finding from chapter 2.3 as<br />

well as from chapter 3.1 is fully confirmed; the old administrative report, which was<br />

composed before the War and later worked into the Life, is a fact that is<br />

unequivocally established.<br />

But beyond this confirmation of our general findings we shall be led to further special<br />

insights here as well. We have seen that John alone is at fault in the War, whereas the<br />

Tiberians, who according [87] to the Life had defected, on the contrary remain true to<br />

<strong>Josephus</strong> here. Thus <strong>Josephus</strong> logically had to delete the attack of the town of Tiberias by<br />

<strong>Josephus</strong>’ followers. His loyal followers can have gathered together only against John of<br />

Gischala, <strong>Josephus</strong>’ sole opponent. But according to the War he was alone in Tiberias with only<br />

a few companions, hard pressed by the Tiberians and by <strong>Josephus</strong>’ soldiers. <strong>The</strong>refore, if the<br />

“thousands of Galileans” should have still intended to fight against him, then nothing<br />

remained but to remove him from Tiberias and locate him in a spot where he could have forces<br />

around himself against which the Galileans’ attack was possible.<br />

For this reason <strong>Josephus</strong> has John flee from Tiberias to his hometown Gischala, and the<br />

Galileans in the War logically now turn their hatred, which that they could have had in the Life<br />

against Tiberias, against John and Gischala, the inhabitants of which had taken John in. Thus<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!